Sunday, September 29, 2013

Women shouldn't drive ... based on "science."

A consultant to the Gulf Psychological Association, al-Luhaydan issued this warning about female driving in an interview published on the website on Friday: “Physiological science and functional medicine studied this side [and found] that it automatically affects ovaries and rolls up the pelvis. This is why we find for women who continuously drive cars their children are born with clinical disorders of varying degrees.” 

Women who want to be permitted to drive should place “reason ahead of their hearts, emotions and passions,” he said.

Yes, place "reason" ahead of your hearts you selfish women.  Ever notice?  The tyrants are always using "reason and science" when they are stealing your liberty.

From the 2010 census ... One Dot = One person

Click here for a more detailed look.

Found it at the very cool ...  Book of Joe:

Thursday, September 26, 2013

How are we doing on the national debt?

Did you know that since President Obama came into office, the debt limit has been raised seven times?
With those increases, Congress has added $43,000 in debt for every American household in just the last four years.

And now the debt limit deadline is looming again. Treasury will run out of tricks to keep paying the bills on October 17, Secretary Jack Lew announced yesterday.

Instead of pursuing significant spending cuts and entitlement reforms that are desperately needed to get spending under control, House Republicans reportedly are proposing to suspend the debt ceiling for more than a year, which would add $1.1 trillion to the debt.

So, take that $43,000 per household that was added in the last four years and tack on another $8,800 per household.

What happened the last time Congress raised the debt ceiling? Did they accomplish any meaningful spending cuts before increasing the debt limit? More here:

By the way, if you're interested ... the Fed is keeping interest rates artificially low.  When they finally have to let them go (and they will,) how high do you think they will go?  Let's say they return to the average of the last 20 years.  If they do that. then 85% of your taxes will go to paying just the interest on the debt (assuming they don't go further into debt ... and that's not counting this new chunk either.)

Where did all of our money go?  Any idea?  (Hint: think spreading it around to their buddies thru various government contracts.) What's the richest county in America?  Look it up, it borders Washington DC.

Most of the time when the media shows you some "selfless non-profit" it's usually some buddy of a congressman somewhere who is making a TON of salary for himself and other corporate officers and being VERY careful not to show a profit.  And all their income comes from a government program or contract.

Every year Washington takes in a record amount of revenue and they go even further into debt. Do you think this wildly increasing debt has any effect whatsoever on our economy?  Oh, of course not, after all, the media has been telling you we're in recovery ever since Obama (the democratics) came into office.  Baaaa-Bleat.

Hey, don't worry, though, they're slowing the spending down now, right?

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Exactly What I Have Been Saying All Along

I guess the science wasn't as settled as they tried to lead us to believe...

Sunday, September 22, 2013

What happens when you hit a diamond with a hammer?

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Gun goes on rampage

H/T wombat

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Jail the hardworking citizen who protects his property!


PARIS (AP) -- Outrage is growing in France over the decision to bring voluntary homicide charges against a jeweler who shot and killed an escaping robber, but the country's top security official on Tuesday urged fearful storekeepers to let justice take its course.

The 67-year-old jeweler, Stephan Turk, was confined at home with an electronic bracelet after the shooting last week that left a teenage robber dead in the street outside Turk's jewelry story in the French Riviera city of Nice. An accomplice escaped on a motorbike as the body lay in the street.  More here:

That's right, you're supposed to work hard all the time but if some peckersniff wants your stuff then you're supposed to just give it to him and pray the cops catch him later ... you know .,.. when they're not putting up DUI roadblocks and trying to peel you for being .08.

Because you see, letting the criminal get away ... that's the "smart" thing to do ... it's what the libs insist you do ... and if you instead decide to fight then they'll put you in jail ... especially if you use an AR-15 to defend yourself.

After all, they have their "slogans" you're supposed to believe.  


As a lib, it is your job to pretend it's all so profound and nod knowingly.
No amount of $$ is worth a life.

Its only money.

Let justice take its course.
"Even when faced with the unbearable, we have to let justice prevail," Interior Minister Manuel Valls said Tuesday in Nice, where he was sent by the president a day after a protest by hundreds of Turk's supporters.

See what I mean?  This jackass politician wants you to just give up your money without a fight.  And if they DO catch the guy, do you suppose they'll punish him properly?  Or do you suppose they'll let him loose to prey on society (YOU) over and over again.

Do you suppose that this was the criminal's first run-in with the law?  Yes, it was probably the first time he ever robbed someone ... and now he's dead ... see what a shame that is?

DC Mayor knows why mass shooter was able to act


D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray (pictured above) said he wondered if budget cuts had something to do with a gunman getting onto the Washington Navy Yard on Monday, killing 12 before being killed himself.

“As I look at, for example, sequestration, which is about saving money in the federal government being spent, have we somehow skimped on what would be available for projects like this and then we put people at risk,” Mr. Gray said on CNN’s “New Day” on Tuesday morning. More here:

So ... now we know ... it was "the sequester" ... aka "the politicians have limited spending right now."  Do you see his reasoning? That's right, limiting their spending is a huge problem and you might be killed because of it.

Hey, mayor ... something tells me that global warming played a part in this too.

Some guy giving klowns a bad name

 Northampton clown. Image: Facebook

A creepy and anonymous clown has been terrifying residents of Northampton by standing around on street corners and staring at passers-by.

He's getting messages on his facebook page.

However, many messages have expressed anger at the clown for scaring people, with one user writing: "You've been spotted now get out of the clown suit and start acting like a grown up that you supposing are and stop scaring people as some people do have real fears of clowns and you are terrorising them despite what you may say." Others have threatened violence should they see the clown. More here:

LMAO - "... threatened violence should they see the clown."   Better think twice, Mr Badass.

Monday, September 16, 2013

Internet sales tax ... aka "Free money for scum"

Yes, tell your senators ... they'll understand.  It cracks me up ... even if every single person said "no" the senators would still vote "yes."   You know why?  Because they never, EVER turn down a chance to get at your money.

Republican and Democratic state officials hope the bill will give them a new stream of revenue.

Republicans in the House are taking a step forward on Internet sales tax legislation despite potential opposition from the GOP base.

Well of COURSE they are going to tax "internet sales."  Why wouldn't they?  Is there ANYTHING they don't tax anymore?  Yes, they have slowly, over time, managed to tax everything you do and everything you buy.  And when they find they've missed something, they go forthwith to tax it.

The funniest part is, their revenue is going through the roof but they're going bankrupt.

Every single year they collect more than the prior year and they end up deeper in debt.  There's something else that's funny ... no matter how much they collect from you, it's never, EVER, enough.

Idiot libs in constant state of bafflement

The suspect in today’s deadly shooting at the Washington Navy Yard was once arrested for discharging a firearm into the ceiling of his Texas residence, according to police records. 

The local district attorney subsequently declined to file charges against Alexis. More here: 

Declined to file charges? Yes, the libs ... they mollycoddle a useless shitstain like this ... and wonder how this could EVER have happened. And they truly wonder. They have zero clue how these two things might be related. 

As we speak they're busy defending a dead guy who charged the cops even after he was tasered. They paint him as a "victim." And they prosecute the cop who was trying to protect society. Makes perfect sense right? 

The three officers from the Hickory Grove division who responded to the scene came across a man matching the description of the possible suspect, and they surrounded him. The man “immediately charged” at the police, Monroe said. Officer Thornell Little unsuccessfully fired his Taser at Ferrell, who continued to run toward them, police said in a statement. Kerrick then fired several rounds at Ferrell, who was shot multiple times and pronounced dead at the scene, police said. 

The evidence showed that Ferrell advanced on Kerrick, but the subsequent shooting of Ferrell was “excessive” and violated the law regarding voluntary manslaughter, according to police. More here:

Excuse me?  The "evidence" showed?  Sounds to me like the exact opposite.  Let me guess, the officers only said "STOP - GET ON THE GROUND" about 50 times, right?

Mr Kerrick, after a jury finds you innocent I hope you sue the town into bankruptcy.  Of course, the only way that would work is if the government stopped giving my money to other people. Something tells me that going hungry because you've been sued due to electing idiots would go a long way toward stopping people from electing idiots.

Meanwhile, they defend repeat criminals and jail the cops ... and then wonder why these scumballs start with the mayhem. What a mystery ... baffling bolts from the blue ... you know ... if you're an idiot-lib.

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Kitty brown out

Friday, September 13, 2013

The libs, always telling you how to join the "cool crowd."

Don't believe me?  Here's a link to the video:

Vice President Joe Biden said Republican opposition to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in the House of Representatives came from the "Neanderthal crowd." And he gave himself credit for coming up with the law almost 20 years ago. More here: 

Hey ... Biden ... if I let you call me a Neanderthal will you keep your hand out of my pocket and leave me alone? Right. That's what I thought. 

Notice the libs ... always saying how stupid you are if you don't agree with them ... or if you object to them taking your money. That's right, you're a greedy, racist, Neanderthal. 

If you want to be seen as cool and smart, just agree with them and give them as much money/liberty as they want. Then you'll be a genius ... you'll be a part of the "in crowd."
Won't that be great?  Yes, you can achieve the dream of the mentally weak.

I love how politicians think they're "doing something" when they pass laws like this.  As if violence itself isn't already illegal, they have to pass a "Violence against women" law.  WTF?

And the cool/smart sheep bleat in agreement and approval.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Naked peeper gets caught -- learns lesson against wishes of libs

Emilio Chavez - The dad who caught naked peeping tom outside his daughter's window.
Or, as the libs call him - "The Bad Guy"

An Albuquerque, New Mexico dad who found a naked prowler peering into his young daughter's room will face charges after seriously beating the peeping tom.

Police say Emilio Chavez III found 29-year-old Dylan Maho naked and making noises near a little girl's window when he chose to exact vigilante justice and beat Maho so badly he was taken to the hospital.

While both men could be convicted of felonies, Chavez could potentially get a longer sentence for what he did to the intruder. More here:

It seems to me that the founding fathers set up a jury system thinking "It will be impossible for idiot-lib lawyers to convince twelve regular citizens they ought to punish things that aren't crimes."

But the founders were wrong, weren't they.

They didn't realize that the drive the people have to be thought of as "smart" would lead them to do very stupid things ... i.e. be talked into convicting someone for this.

The lawyers will tell the jury "You MUST convict, if you find he broke the law."  Except for one thing ... they DON'T have to convict.  I think jurors sometimes forget why they are there. After all, if they MUST convict, then why have a jury?

It was probably this guy's first offense, right?  Sure, the libs are ALL about giving people second chances ... and third and fourth chances.  They don't mind if the guy comes back to your window.

Meanwhile, this isn't the first run-in the neighborhood has had with the peeping tom. 'They call him the nudist around here' Morang [a neighbor] told 'Apparently he's been looking in other peoples' windows.' 

If I were on this jury and found it to be true that this guy was naked outside the little girl's window then Emilio Chavez would walk like a recently cured paraplegic.

Something tells me he won't be going around Mr Chavez's house anytime soon.   That's right, despite what libs say, even "crazy" people can learn ... and 99% of the time they know the difference between right and wrong.

Hey, I love how the jourrrrrnalist puts a pic of the father in the story (as if the dad was the criminal) but somehow leaves out a pic of the naked peeper.  Yes, that sounds about right, doesn't it?

This would be a better metaphor if he had his neighbors hooked up too

H/T Wombat

Monday, September 9, 2013

Don't bother questioning the libs ... they found Hitler

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., invoked the killings in Nazi Germany in World War II on Monday as he opened debate on a measure to authorize military strikes against Syria. More here:

Yes ... "invokes the Nazis."

I just want to point something out here for your consideration. The libs have a habit of this ... first, they get everyone to "agree" that __________ is witch-like.  A few that leap to mind are "Nazis," "Racists," and "Greedy Capitalist Pigs."

Once they get you on board about what is good/bad (and you better NOT argue) they set about drawing parallels between the witches (the bad) and their enemies.

So, if you disagree with them, you are a witch, that's all.  You are a racist, or nazi, or greedy, etc etc.

So they love to point and holler witch and then watch the sheep all bleat along with them ... harrumphing all the way.  Think of a crowd of brainwashed morons all harrumphing together once a witch is found.  Can't you just hear the crowd screaming "burn her ... BURN HER."

And nobody wants to get accused of being a witch, right?  That's right, so pipe down and do as they tell you.  Otherwise they'll start observing that your nose is looking a bit pointy.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

LOL @ Americans scrambling for the last bits of their freedom

Applications for gun purchases in Maryland are soaring ahead of the start of a tough new firearms law that sets new magazine capacity limits and bans the sale of certain types of assault weapons.

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, proposed the bill in January in response to the December shooting in Newtown, Conn., where a gunman killed 20 children and six adults.

How about that.  A "Democratic" stealing your freedom.  How incongruous.  I wonder how George Washington would view this pathetic vista of law-abiding Americans ... scrambling like peasants in the face of an edict from on high.

But it's for your own good ... completely understandable ... he's trying to make the gun laws tougher ... like in Chicago and Washington DC. (the murder capitals of the United States.)

You can tell Democratics that the "tough guns laws" in these cities have not reduced their crime/murder rate at all ... but to them it means nothing ... it's just a fact ... and facts are not relevant or important.

What IS important?  Disarming the general law-abiding public is important.  That way you can't fight when they take the last bits of your freedom.  Just remember though, it's for your own good ... really.

More here:

Nobel Peace Prize winner ready for war

The White House narrowed its strategy Sunday on convincing Capitol Hill that the United States should launch a military strike on Syria, asking why wouldn’t lawmakers agree to punish the use of nerve gas on children and others when the evidence is indisputable ... More here:

"Indisputable."  Except plenty of world leaders are disputing it.

Why is it ok for Assad to rain down missiles and bullets but chemical weapons "cross a line?"

The best part is he gets to squander untold more millions of dollars.

Once again, the priests of global warming are correct

Here's "Doctor" Gerry Bell ... standing in front of a "step-and-repeat" board.  That's right ... all the cool people/companies have a step-and-repeat board and libs CANNOT stand it if they aren't in with the cool crowd.  And if that means they have to squander your money and defend it with "it's just a drop in the bucket" then so be it.

At the start of every season, NOAA's Climate Prediction Center sounds the global warming "we TOLD you it was coming" alarm.  And every season they hope you get amnesia about their predictions from the prior year.

Here they were in May of 2013:

“This year, oceanic and atmospheric conditions in the Atlantic basin are expected to produce more and stronger hurricanes,” said Gerry Bell, Ph.D., lead seasonal hurricane forecaster with NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center.

More from these clever, clucking, clairvoyant geniuses here:

Yes.  One of the things I LOVE about idiot-libs is how embarrassment bounces off them like a bullet off Superman.  It's as if they couldn't care less that you know their predictions are almost ALWAYS incorrect ... they still come back and do the same thing again ... as if their followers are total idiots and will NEVER catch on.

So after nothing was happening, they weren't embarrassed at all and, on August 8th, came out with:

NOAA issued its updated Atlantic hurricane season outlook today saying the season is shaping up to be above normal with the possibility that it could be very active.

“Our confidence for an above-normal season is still high because the predicted atmospheric and oceanic conditions that are favorable for storm development have materialized,” said Gerry Bell, Ph.D., lead seasonal hurricane forecaster at NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center, ... more here:

Yes, never give up, right Bell?  Get a real job and get the hell off my wallet, crapstain.  AS IF anyone could predict hurricanes so far in advance.  The funniest part is, it doesn't matter whether they are right or wrong, they still get paid ... by me ... why?  Because the bleating sheep their followers still get to vote on my freedom/wallet and implement ridiculous "programs" like this.

But what is the reality (once ... again?) Here's a little headline from Sept 7.

"It certainly looks like pretty much of a forecast bust," said Jeff Masters, a hurricane expert and director of meteorology at the Weather Underground (

"Virtually all the (forecast) groups were calling for above-normal hurricanes and intensive hurricanes and we haven't even had a hurricane at all, with the season half over," he said.

With records going back to 1851, Dennis Feltgen, a spokesman for the U.S. National Hurricane Center, said there had been only 17 years when the first Atlantic hurricane formed after September 4.

But never mind the facts, they'll be back next May ... predicting the worst, again.  And the media will blast the warnings, again ... with not such as a meep about how they were wrong last year, and the year before, and the year before that, ad infinitum.   No, no, t'will all be forgotten in the name of the great global warming and the "public good." Oh, and the amnesiac sheep will bleat, again. 

My favorite part?  When they're right once every few years they come a-boasting, "We told you so ... heed our words ... global warming is our doom ... give us your money, do what you're told, and all will be well."

You know, seriously, I don't have any problem at all with them being wrong all the time.  My only problem is they charge me to do it.  And if I object they tell me how greedy I am.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

I think this guy is typical of the people you pay to teach your children

The stuff nobody will mention:
Notice the "Republicans" are greedy for raping the country ... but you ... YOU DESERVE their money.

You Democratics ... you aren't not greedy at all, no ... you DESERVE their money.  And those greedy Republicans are trying to stop you from getting their money ... well, I NEVER!
Notice how this guy is confident he won't get in trouble for this "lecture."
H/T Wombat

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

OMG ... a photo-shopped pic means that someone might act out the illustration

So some food critic wrote a review of a chef.  And, nossir ...  the chef didna like it.  And then "somehow" a photo-shopped pic of him holding her severed head got tweeted out.  Interesting so far?  Oh yes.

Well, as you might imagine, it didn't take long for the libs to grab a 'tude the indignance of the perpetually indignant to be thrust onto their usual lecture podium prominent pages of the newspapers.

The headline I saw was "Dublin chef faces criticism for tweeting 'severed' head of food critic."

Yes, "faces criticism."  But they never really say from whom, do they.  It's like when they use "some say" ... or "critics say."  It might be just the jourrrnalist one person but they want everyone on their side.  

Ask yourself ... why wasn't the headline "Chef posts joke pic, some have no sense of humor"?

My first thought was "Ha ha, some lib is having a brown out due to a severed head pic."  

But seriously ... how DARE this chef respond to this genius "food critic?"  I mean, as we all know, we're supposed to just bend over and silently allow the libs to raunch us in the fudgetunnel while they're wearing their pig masks ... right?  And we're supposed to keep quiet while our intellectual betters hold forth on subjects they know little about.  Finally, and most importantly (to libs,) we are to NEVER joke about violence.

So after the original kerfluffle the chef writes his response to the food critic.  It's here but you have to locate the post called "declined" and then click "read more."

I found it interesting and proudly feel like I have gotten to the bottom of this "problem."  However, unlike a lib, I will wait until the aggrieved parties ask me to mediate before swooping to the rescue with all the swashbuckling/problem-solving/helping ... but I can reveal that my recommended solution is already in this post somewhere.

Monday, September 2, 2013

Whatever would we do without geniuses?

Several Florida high schools are restricting or even banning their own cheerleading uniforms -- saying the skimpy skirts violate dress codes. 

High schools in Pinellas County are not allowing cheerleaders to wear their uniforms during the school day because of the outfits' short skirt and sleeveless top, reported. For generations, cheerleaders have donned their gear during the school day for pep rallies before Friday night football games. 

This is pure GENIUS!  What I want to know is how we all got along for so long with cheerleaders wearing their "skimpy" outfits on game days at school?  Anyway, FINALLY this awesome common sense move has been made.  Whew.

I just LOVE it when some jackass decides to push everyone around by using some stupid "rule" as an excuse. "Well, we have to have the rule so I can push you around in order to treat everyone the same.  If we don't treat everyone the same we could get sued. I'm smarter than you so listen to me." 

Just another in a never ending series of stupid moves taken under the guise of avoiding lawsuits.  And the sad thing is, it will never end, and here's why.

Let's say there is a dangerous crossing on your property but you allow peeps to use it ... and finally someone gets hurt.  The lawyers sue you saying "you didn't warn people so you should give up your money."

So later you put up a sign "Warning - Dangerous Crossing" and later someone gets hurt.  The lawyers sue you saying "Look, that witch KNEW it was dangerous and still let people use it ... he should give up his money."  Notice this much, it ALWAYS ends with "... he should give up his money."

You can't win.  You'll NEVER win.  Lawyers aren't interested in "helping victims" as they claim ... they're only interested in helping themselves to our collective wallets.  Because every time they sue one of us (or a corporation) then our insurance goes up, or our prices go up, etc etc -- because guess what, money isn't free and these lawsuits have to be paid for.  Just ask a doctor about his malpractice insurance.

Ever ask yourself, why is every other commercial on television about suing the drug companies?  1-800-bad-drug.  Lots of "bad drugs" out there ... ever notice? Must just be a coinkydink, right?

Gee, I wonder why health costs are so high.  But take heart folks ... banning cheerleading outfits will save us untold millions in potential lawsuits.