Friday, June 29, 2012

Government steals more of your freedom (and money)

France on Sunday will become the first country to require all drivers, including tourists, to carry hand-held breathalyzers in all vehicles — a move to help the wine-loving country crack down on drunken driving. 

The law takes effect July 1 and was approved in March 2011. It is aimed at convincing drivers to check their blood alcohol level before starting their vehicles.

The law is being watched closely by auto safety advocates in the United States. In the U.S., 10,228 people were killed in 2010 in alcohol-related crashes, down 4.9 percent over 2009 France had about 4,000 road deaths in 2011, down from 16,000 annually in the early 1970s. 

Nearly 30 percent of road deaths in France are alcohol-related — or about 1,150. That's about the same percentage in the United States. 

France has also instituted stricter drunk driving laws and tougher penalties in recent years. 

Well of COURSE they have ... "drunk" drivers are one class of witch ... and they know as well as the US politicians that fining witches is a VERY lucrative way to "get funding" for the government.  So you just keep lowering the standard to keep the euros flowing, right Jaques?

France requires drivers to carry a first-aid kit, fire extinguisher and spare light bulbs for headlamps. 
Ha ha ... what?  No tire pump?  Spare radio? Toothpicks?

And from a different article: 
It is the latest in a series of requirements imposed on drivers by the French Government. Motorists are also legally obliged to carry a warning triangle and fluorescent vest as well ... 

Ha ha, a fluorescent vest ... French jackasses. What I want to know is which politician's brother-in-law is in the fluorescent vest and/or "warning triangle" business ... you know ... if they're anything like America.

On Friday, the American Beverage Institute, representing more than 8,000 restaurants, opposed a measure to expand research on alcohol ignition interlocks that could one day prevent drunken drivers from starting their vehicles. D'OH!  I have an idea ... how about we put those on the entry doors to the congressional chamber/offices ... how about THAT?  I mean, if you're going to be driving the country, shouldn't you be sober?

The highway bill approved by the House and Senate Friday funds the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety, a federal program working to create alcohol detection systems for installation as standard equipment in all cars.

Yes, standard in ALL cars ... but don't worry, the price of your car won't go up, these are FREE!!! Everything the government does is FREE!!

And thank you congress ... whatever would we do without the federal government freely squandering our money like that. I'm so GLAD you have time to do this kind of thing while you're bankrupting us.  Yes, please, take time out of your busy schedules to see what other things you can do to inflict the government into my daily life ... PLEASE .... I'M AN IDIOT-LIB AND CAN'T LIVE MY LIFE WITHOUT CONSTANT GOVERNMENT APPROVAL AND OVERSIGHT!!

 The bill appropriates $5 million in additional funding over two years for the research program. 

Oh really, only five million? And who's friend/brother-in-law is getting the money?

LOL @ "additional FUNDING."  I'll bet a politician or bureaucrat can't go five minutes without using the word "funding" (or "revenue enhancement.")  They're up there getting filthy rich and enriching their filthy friends and relatives with our money.  Where are the jourrrrrnalists?  Oh, nevermind.

Flee, "Democratics," FLEE -- it's good practice for you

About eighty House Democrats (aka "Democratics") walked out of the House Chamber in protest when the contempt vote on Attorney General Eric Holder began this afternoon.  Though the effort to protest the contempt vote on Holder was conceived by Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Emanuel Cleaver, it gained steam among non-CBC members.

The contempt vote against Holder was the first against any White House cabinet official in American history.  The vote passed easily in the GOP controlled House by 255 to 67. More here:

Now, is it just me or are these "Democratics" suddenly flying out the door (in protest, of course) every time they're about to lose a vote?  I seem to recall this happening in a few state legislatures as well over the past few years.

I can't make up my mind if they're walking out in protest or if someone told a bunch of them that cameramen and friendly jourrrrrnalists were outside.  Yes, the media is there to show the American people "we're not taking this injustice lying down." 

CNN helped your understanding of this issue by issuing a "Breaking News" alert.

The House of Representatives passed a civil contempt measure against Attorney General Eric Holder for his refusal to turn over documents tied to the Fast and Furious gun-running sting.

The House earlier approved a criminal contempt measure. The civil measure passed in a sharply polarized 258-95 vote. More here:

Yes, CNN, thanks for making sure we understand that a 258-95 vote is "sharply polarizing."  I wonder, CNN, when the house passed Obamacare with a vote of 219-212, did you describe that as "sharply polarizing?"  Asshats. 

But keep it up, CNN (and mainstream media)  because it does actually work on your audience, such as it is.  Let's face it, there are plenty of Americans who need to be told what to think  You have made them question their own intelligence and brainwashed them into such political correctness they are afraid to be "wrong" about anything ... and to them "wrong" means they disagree with the media's point of view.

Ever ask yourself .... Why was our government selling guns to the drug gangs in Mexico?  Especially gangs that are busy violating our border all the time?  And why is Chairman Issa trying to get documents out of Eric Holder?  And why is Holder resisting?

Well, here's the call.  The Democratics are very busy trying to steal your liberty all the time ... and one of the main obstacles to them is your right to carry a gun.  You might recall Benjamin Franklin's analogy regarding the necessity of an armed citizenry.  
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. 
LOL @ "Contesting the vote ... with a gun"
Anyway, many people feel that this whole "Operation Fast and Furious" was designed so that the Democratics could point to the inevitable murders and mayhem and say "See, we need to restrict gun rights."  And so Chairman Issa is trying to get all the documents to see if that might be true.  And Eric Holder is resisting ... and was held in criminal contempt of congress.

If you or I refused to comply with an order to produce documents, we'd be in jail, wouldn't we? Is Holder in jail?

Hey, "Democratics" ... keep practicing bolting from votes you're going to lose.  In fact, just start calling it a "drill."  I have a feeling that, after November, you're going to be glad you practiced.

More leftist idiots, erm, I mean "Obama voters" protesting

You know, it occurs to me ... the leftists sure seem to have a lot of protests in which the individual "protesters" don't know what they're protesting.  I've seen example after example. Have you ever noticed that?  Gee, you don't think they're getting paid to be there, do you?

fri pins

yea no pins I know but who cares

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ragweed's business card

Supreme Court sees through Obama on healthcare

That's right folks.  Even though Obama and ALL his minions said REPEATEDLY that 'this is not a tax' the Supreme Court knew better and declared the law constitutional based on congress' power to tax.

Chief Justice Roberts declared "it is not the job of SCOTUS to protect the people from their own idiocy political decisions."

So now the government can compel/force you to buy a product.  And if they can do that, is there ANYTHING left they cannot force you to do? 

"But Klown, they can't force to you be a slave."

Au Contriare mon frere.  If you work for your money and they can force you to spend your money against your will then you are a slave ...  they have stolen your labor ... to what degree is debatable but you are a slave.

Meanwhile, what about this "not our job to protect you ..." crap sandwich from Roberts.  Hey, Roberts, bottom line ... you let them steal my gd money/labor/liberty.  I won't forget it.

There is only one thing to do ... increase resolve, get off our asses and get more involved in the political process ... and contribute to the long and gradual change back to freedom.

It's official, a communist just declared the Tea Party is dead

Liberal political consultant James Carville sent a fundraising email to supporters of upstate New York congresswoman Louise Slaughter entitled “The Tea Party is Over.”

“These Tea Party Republicans have worn out their welcome." More here:

Oh, pipe down, Skeletor.  "Worn out their welcome?" What "welcome?"  They were never welcome ... oh, maybe their money was welcome but the "Democratics" don't like it when taxpayers (Tea Party)  question the squandering of their cash.

I know you're hating it, Carville, but The Tea Party will be here kicking the asses of communists, erm, I mean "Democratics," until you're as dead as you look ... you spooky-assed grim reaper looking mf'r.

The irony wasn't lost on me either ... you know ... THIS GUY, of all people declaring something dead ... perhaps he was looking in the mirror.

So what do the genius jourrrrnalists say about the forthcoming Supreme Court decision?

I was reading this article at Newsbusters.

CNN's Jeffrey Toobin predicted an eight-to-one vote upholding the law.

Appearing on the March 23 Situation Room, Toobin hyped, "I actually think that Chief Justice Roberts and perhaps even Justice Scalia and Justice Alito might join Justice Kennedy in upholding the law."

Oh, shut up, you moron.  CNN, oh please.

Former New York Times Court reporter Linda Greenhouse said that Americans who think the law is unconstitutional are "wrong."

LINDA GREENHOUSE: About half the public apparently believes that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate is unconstitutional.... I’m here to tell you: that belief is simply wrong.

Yes, the government has the power to force you to buy something ... the framers of our constitution had that in mind.  Too bad the framers were so stupid that this mandatory health care thing never occurred to them.  Heck, those guys were so dumb they didn't even think to include an income tax on the people.  Yep, I'll bet they'd be kicking themselves in the ass if they could see how the idiot-libs true geniuses of today handle things.

It's amazing, isn't it?  How these jourrrrrnalists cheerlead for Obama (and the "Demcoratics" in general.)  Meanwhile, everything they do has to affect other people.  They aren't satisfied getting into the toilet by themselves, no ... they have to force the rest of us in with them.  

And the worst part is, no matter how shitty it is in there, they can never seem to smell it.

Women's tennis ... grunting a HUGE problem ... apparently

I never watch tennis but I saw this headline about banning grunting.  Since I didn't want to to miss a good grunt-ban argument, I clicked on over.

I read the story and I must have missed the important parts because I didn't see where the reporter drew out the important information.  I was left thinking "huh?"  Anyway, the story begins thusly:

A plan to crack down on ultra-loud grunting in women’s tennis has been “unanimously green-lighted” by the WTA players’ council, representatives from all four majors and the International Tennis Federation, according to USA Today.

“It’s time for us to drive excessive grunting out of the game for future generations,” WTA CEO Stacey Allaster told the publication. More here:

The first thing I thought  of was "libs LOVE 'cracking down' on things."  However, they never "crack down" on truly annoying or rude things, no, they're always cracking down on things that don't affect them ... like whether I'm going to eat some salt or get a 17-ounce soda.  I conclude these people aren't libs ... but I could be wrong, I didn't exactly do a ton of research before making this post.

Anyway, here's a sample of the "grunting." FYI - I understand there are also "screamers" which will be dealt with under this same rule.

I mean, I can assume for myself that grunting when hitting a tennis ball would be annoying to the non-grunting public (or opponent.) Assuming it IS annoying to the public then it would probably affect the organization's ability to sell tickets to the matches. Regardless, it is the organization's right to make any rules it likes, period. 

Anyway, I was reading the comments on the story when I ran across "Thor." He makes the following observation: 

Grunting not required to hit small objects, i.e, tennis balls, shuttlecocks, racket balls, ping pong balls, pool balls, yet Thor see women do this too. Grunting only allowed to hit big objects like Thor's 300lb lineman brother, and Thor's wife, Bertha.

Thor say women are drama queens. No can help. Thor hope congress not get involved.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Pollsters are idiots

So, for a variety of reasons I've been paying attention to a US Senate race in New York.

And I was rooting for this lady "Wendy Long."

She got endorsements from the Tea Party and many other noteworthy endorsements ... and yet, inexplicably, the jourrrrnalists said she trailed in the polls. That's right ... the "media" said she would probably lose ... so you Wendy Long supporters might as well not get out and vote ... you know ... you'd just be wasting your time.

Below is a sample of the idiotic sputum mainstream media genius that was written before the actual vote yesterday.

The latest Siena Research Institute poll tells us a little more about the Republican primary for U.S. Senate. 

The poll, released Monday, still shows a majority of GOP voters — 70 percent — don't know who they will be voting for. But among the 30 percent who have decided, there are some interesting stats. 

For example, U.S. Rep. Bob Turner is supported by 16 percent of GOP voters, according to the poll. 

Eleven percent of voters said they will be supporting Wendy Long, and 3 percent said they are backing George Maragos. 

But it's where Turner is getting most of his support that's worth mentioning. Forty-four percent of New York City GOP voters surveyed said they are voting for Turner, while 48 percent said they don't know who they will be voting for. 

That leaves Long and Maragos with only a small percentage of support from GOP voters in the Big Apple. More here:

Yes, my poor, poor, candidate was behind ... "only a small percentage of support in the Big Apple."

But then ... this morning ... LO ... what manner of headline is cast in front of me Irish eyes?

Wendy Long rolled to victory in the state Republican U.S. Senate primary last night, and will face U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) in the Nov. 6 general election.  

And as soon as she wins, what liberal pablum jourrrrnalistic information headline is thrust in front of me Irish eyes? 

Democrats wasted no time attacking the Republican candidate. State Democratic Committee co-chairman Keith Wright in a prepared statement released Tuesday night accused Long of holding "extreme ideological views."  More here:

See? The reporter wants to ensure you're aware of her "extreme views" ... you know, views like:
a) supports the right to own a gun
b) supports the idea we should protect the border
c) supports the idea the government stop borrowing/squandering my money

You know, ideas that are WAY out there, right Keith? Listen, genius, we're coming for you (and people LIKE you) in November and we're going to kick your ass into a pulp -- and then kick the pulp ... politically speaking, of course.

And thanks, mainstream media ... thanks once again for the forthright AND very helpful information you provided in terms of a realistic expectation of outcomes in this election.   GREAT JOB, YOU IDIOTS.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Ever heard of Dennis Prager? Well, now you have.

This clip features Dennis Prager on a panel at the University of Denver. You'll recognize the other panelists, but disregard them, they do not speak; this is about Prager. And he is about the future of this nation. This is worth the few minutes it takes to watch.

Monday, June 25, 2012

WT F is wrong with these people?

If Muslim Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Mursi became president, Egypt’s new capital will no more be Cairo, but the new capital will be Jerusalem, a prominent Egyptian cleric said at a presidential campaign rally, which was aired by an Egyptian private TV channel.

“Our capital shall not be Cairo, Mecca or Medina. It shall be Jerusalem with God’s will. Our chants shall be: ‘millions of martyrs will march towards Jerusalem’,” prominent cleric Safwat Hagazy said, according to the video aired by Egypt’s religious Annas TV on Tuesday.

Yes, because Cairo isn't a very good capital and everyone knows it ... it's embarrassing.  We shall NOT TAKE THIS EMBARRASSMENT ANY LONGER!!

 “The United States of the Arabs will be restored on the hands of that man [Mursi] and his supporters. The capital of the [Muslim] Caliphate will be Jerusalem with God’s will,” Hegazy said, as the crowds cheered, waving the Egyptian flags along with the flags of the Islamist Hamas group, which rules the Gaza Strip.

Muslim Caliphate?  Huh?  Gee, this is the first I've heard of this.  We better write Obama and our representatives ... likely they are in the dark about the intentions of "the muslims."

“Tomorrow Mursi will liberate Gaza,” the crowds chanted.

“Yes, we will either pray in Jerusalem or we will be martyred there,” Hegazy said.

Oh oh ... they want to pray in Jerusalem.  That would mean BIG TROUBLE for non-muslims ... you know ... since Allah can't hear their prayers unless they are praying from Jerusalem ... or perhaps if they are facing Mecca ... or dancing an Irish jig ... or something ...  there are RULES you know.
While suturing a cut on the hand of a 75 year old rancher whose hand was caught in the squeeze gate while working cattle, the doctor struck up a conversation with the old man.
Eventually the topic got around to Obama and his role as our president.

The old rancher said, 'Well, ya know, Obama is a 'Post Turtle''.
Not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked him, what a 'post turtle' was.

The old rancher said, 'When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a 'post turtle'.

The old rancher saw the puzzled look on the doctor's face so he continued to explain. "You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up there, he doesn't know what to do while he's up there, he's elevated beyond his ability to function, and you just wonder what kind of dumb ass put him up there to begin with."

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Obama thinks his job is managing the economy

TAMPA, Fla., June 22 (UPI) -- U.S. President Barack Obama told a campaign rally in Florida Friday the country needs "some middle class-out economics, some bottom-up economics." More here:

Hey, dipshit, let me clue you in.  The government needs to stop meddling in "the economy."  JUST STOP!!!  I want all you geniuses in Washington to roll your intellect up into a bumpy ball and cram it up your ass.

Who in the hell gave you permission to experiment with "the economy?"  Is that one of the enumerated powers in the constitution? 

The government has no business screwing around with "the economy."  Why don't you stop manipulating "the economy" with your idiotic tax code (and ridiculous "regulations") , and instead, simplify the tax code for the people?  I just can't imagine ... 536 morons in Washington DC think their job ought to be managing the economy.

Meanwhile, what about protecting the borders?  That's in the constitution ... are they doing that?

What about providing a stable currency?  That's in the constitution ... are they doing that?  Or are they printing money out of thin air and buying our own debt with it?  Nothing can go wrong there, right?

What about protecting my  freedom?  Are they doing that?  Or are they stealing more of it every day? (Under the guise of helping me, of course ... it's for my own good, right?)

The government has meddled in, and screwed around with, "the economy" so much that it's  almost impossible to unravel their mischief.  Who could have EVER predicted it would go this far?  Ohhhhh, woe is us.

I think we need to simplify the tax code (Fair Tax,) slash regulations, and slash the size and scope of the federal government by about 25%-40%.  THEN you'd see some action in 'the economy."

Until we start electing people who understand that, we'll all be slaving and paying.

Lady with children

Ack, but Klown that's so insensitive. 

Yes, yes it is ... think of these types of posts as "scarecrows to idiot-libs."

My friend Kevin sent me this in email.

Friday, June 22, 2012

fri pins

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

United Nations (against America)

United Nations Development Programme head Helen Clark told AFP in an interview: “So the issue is how to get human development that will see it continue to rise for the world’s poorest people and people in developing countries. Because frankly human development in the West – we don’t need more cars, more TV, whatever. Our needs are by and large satisfied, although the recession has put a lot of strains on that.” 

Clark, the former prime minister of New Zealand, also stressed the responsibility of richer countries to reduce their environmental footprint: "There is, in my opinion, a very heavy responsibility on the countries of the north to look at how they sustain their living standards with a much lower environmental footprint."

She warned of social and environmental chaos if governments failed to act: “The toxic combination of falling incomes, social unrest and environmental degradation. This is reality. We have got a common problem here. We need to have a shared vision of how to tackle it. We are heading for chaos if we don’t tackle these issues.” More here:

Gotta love that ... "western nations don't need more cars, tv's, whatever ..."

A United Nations official said it so it MUST be true.  And you already know how honest and forthright the United Nations is ... and how it only exists to siphon money from the United States for the benefit of mankind.  

The part I like best is how the United Nations is always scheming on how to take money from the Unites States taxpayer.  That's all it does.  First we pay our tax money to fund this big pile of shit and all it does is think of new ways to justify taking more of our money.  And usually they justify it by saying we OWE it to the world because blah, blah, blah.

It's funny how people and organizations can have similar traits.  For example, the UN reminds me of a spoiled brat teenager.  How many spoiled brat teenagers kill their parents?  And you know WHY spoiled brats kill their parents?  Because the brats figured they were OWED something.  That's right ... the brat's parents don't need more cars or tv's, instead they need to give the money to the brat, right?  Yes, the brat will spend it wisely.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Heh, good one

Gay guy titty-blocks the rest of us (I just assume he's gay)

Southwest Airlines was forced to apologize to a woman who was told she couldn't board her flight because her cleavage was "inappropriate."
Jezebel reports that the woman, Avital — she only gave her first name — was boarding a 6 a.m. flight from Las Vegas to New York on June 5 when a ticket agent remarked that she couldn't fly unless she covered her breasts.

Clad in a comfy cotton dress, a baggy flannel shirt and bright scarf, Avital ignored the warning and marched aboard anyway.

Avital slammed the Southwest for "slut shaming," and said a man on her flight had on a provocative piece of clothing, but wasn't hassled. More here:

Wait, I learned a new phrase ... "slut shaming."  Sorry but I have to vote against shaming sluts.  Hey, all you sluts out there, the Klown is on your side. We're not going to take this lying down, am I right?

This makes as much sense as anything the government does

My friend, Forrest, sent me this cartoon in email.

Obama just granted amnesty to 800,000 illegal aliens - why?

My friend, Forrest, sent me this cartoon in email.

Mysterious attack by wild animals flummoxes libs

A WOMAN zookeeper was mauled to death by a pack of wolves yesterday as she fed them in their enclosure. 

Eight of the wolves are thought to have surrounded and attacked the woman, who was in her 30s. 

Her body was found by a colleague — but the snarling pack would not let anyone near her. Eventually brave zoo workers formed a human chain and rushed the wolves, forcing them back. 

Jan Tengeborg, who organised the attempt to recover the body, said: “We couldn’t get into the enclosure because the wolves clearly did not want us in there. You can’t just walk right into a wolf pack.” 

No one witnessed the attack so it is not yet clear exactly what triggered it. The dead woman has not been named. Yes, wild animals attacking humans ... no matter how many times it happens, it's still a complete and unpredictable mystery ... to libs.

The same pack attacked TV naturalist Arne Weise when Kolmarden Wildlife Park opened in Braviken Bay, Sweden, in 2007.

He said yesterday: “We have to stop interacting so closely with wolves. It is wrong, the risk is too great. We must recognise they are dangerous animals.” More here:

Many things mystify idiot-libs though.  Things such as "there are consequences to spending too much money" totally flummox them.  

Concepts such as this are beyond their ability to comprehend ... and yet the ROCK SOLID SCIENCE of global cooling, erm, I mean global warming, erm, I mean climate change ... is crystal clear to a lib.

It's a mystery, governments need more (MUCH more) of your money

The Prince of Wales has warned of the "catastrophic" consequences of ... inaction on issues such as climate change, at a UN sustainability conference in Rio Brazil.

"Like a sleepwalker, we seem unable to wake up to the fact that so many of the catastrophic consequences of carrying on with 'business-as-usual' are bearing down on us faster than we think, already dragging many millions more people into poverty and dangerously weakening global food, water and energy security for the future," he said. More here:

"Like sleepwalkers."

Uh-huh, and by "business as usual," are you referring to governments around the world out-of-control borrowing and spending?  Are you speaking of the printing of money (out of thin air) which is eroding the people's currency and stealing their freedom?  Stealing their freedom by continuing to spend money you have borrowed on their behalf?  Thereby forcing them into paying for longer periods in order to pay off their debt? 

In fact, they will have to pay so long that they will NEVER be able to pay the debt (unless you take more ... much more ... of their paycheck,) isn't that right?  And so their children and grandchildren will have to pay the debt ... and the children and grandchildren will have gotten NOTHING in return, isn't that right?  

Speaking of getting something in return for the debt, what did WE (the US) get?  Massive redistribution donations of our money to your contributor buddies "green" companies?  Seriously, what are we getting?  And don't tell me "social security and medicare" ... that is already paid for by stealing 15% of our paychecks.  And don't tell me the employer pays half, you idiot.

No, the genius "prince" isn't referring to actual problems, instead he's still trying to convince people about "global warming."  Remember, it is through health, safety, or the environment that the government steals your money and freedom.  The government MUST have money so they can wield power by providing jobs and grants (government contracts) to their buddies.  

Ever notice?  It isn't enough for the government to stick to its actual reasons for existing, i.e. the enumerated powers in the constitution.  No, instead they are focused on the best way to take your money and have you squeal the least.  And the way they do it is to silence your dissent.

And what is the best way to silence you?  Their method is to have other people shout you down and call you stupid.  And that seemed to work, for a while.  I'd say they found out about this method in the early 1960's.
But more and more people are waking up now.  

They've noticed the government never shrinks ... ever.  it only grows and grows.  And while it grows it needs more reasons to grow ... so it makes up reasons ... and you end up with squiggly light bulbs in your house ... and when one of these bulbs breaks, it's a major undertaking (IF you follow the rules set by the government.)  Think I'm kidding?  Here's the EPA's OWN PAGE and the first few light-bulb cleanup rules they have -- and keep in mind, this is BEFORE cleanup.

Before Cleanup

  • Have people and pets leave the room.
  • Air out the room for 5-10 minutes by opening a window or door to the outdoor environment. 
  • Shut off the central forced air heating/air-conditioning system, if you have one.
  • Collect materials needed to clean up broken bulb: 
    • stiff paper or cardboard;
    • sticky tape;
    • damp paper towels or disposable wet wipes (for hard surfaces); and
    • a glass jar with a metal lid or a sealable plastic bag.

HA HA, "like a sleepwalker" indeed.  Yes, this is great.  We need MORE government, don't you agree?  Baaaaaa - bleat.

Again I draw your attention to the fact that these idiots can't do anything on their own.  If these light bulbs were so damn great they'd be able to sell them through word of mouth alone ... but they aren't, and they can't.  So what is their solution?  They FORCE EVERYONE to buy them and outlaw the old ones ... taking a little bit more of your freedom and money.  In this case a LOT more of your money (ever see the price of those bulbs?)

What else does the government do this with ... I mean, besides your car, your employer, and almost everything in your house (toilets, appliances, etc.)  Surely though this is for our own good, right?  It makes things cheaper for me, right?  No?  Then, let me ask this ... we're solving global warming with all this crap, right?

Sunday, June 17, 2012

CAIR Confronts Allen West (with subtitles)

Friday, June 15, 2012

fri pins

Thursday, June 14, 2012

The libs ... coming for your liberty every way they can

MYFOXNY.COM - The board hand-picked by Mayor Michael Bloomberg that must approve his ban of selling large sugar-filled drinks at restaurants might be looking at other targets.

The New York City Board of Health showed support for limiting sizes of sugary drinks at a Tuesday meeting in Queens.  They agreed to start the process to formalize the large-drink ban by agreeing to start a six-week public comment period.

At the meeting, some of the members of board said they should be considering other limits on high-calorie foods.

Well, of COURSE they did.  You know why?  Because it's never enough for the idiot libs. 

No matter how much money the government gets, they squander it all and borrow more.  No matter how many rules the tyrants make for you, it's never enough.  They want to get to Utopia ... and for that, they just need a little bit more of your liberty (and money) ... and a little bit more tomorrow ... and the day after that ... get it?

One member, Bruce Vladeck, thinks limiting the sizes for movie theater popcorn should be considered.

"The popcorn isn't a whole lot better than the soda," Vladeck said.

Another board member thinks milk drinks should fall under the size limits.

"There are certainly milkshakes and milk-coffee beverages that have monstrous amounts of calories," said board member Dr. Joel Forman.

Oh yes, we're finding new things to ban ... Yaaaaaaa!! Weeeeeeeeee.!! It's lib Nirvana!!

Mayor Bloomberg says the drink rules are an attempt to fight obesity in the city.  It would limit food service establishments in the city from serving drinks bigger than 16 ounces but would allow refills.

The New York City Restaurant Association is fighting the proposal and is considering legal action of it goes into effect.

New York City voters oppose 51 - 46 percent Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposed ban on the sale of over-sized sugary soft drinks, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday.  From here:

Can you imagine? Here is some dumbass trying to steal your liberty and 46% of the population doesn't mind.  Why can't that 46% just do it on their own?  Why do they INSIST on banning it for everyone else?  Ahhhhh, yes, you see ... that's where the fun is.

And what is "fun" for idiot libs?  Their favorite thing is to show how smart they are.  But what fun is that unless you can force other people to acknowledge your genius?  See what I'm saying?  I  think you do.

And the crux of this matter is what America's founders struggled with ... as they tried to design a nation in which the majority would not be able to steal freedom from the minority with a simple vote.  They tried to put your liberty out of the reach of petty, dipshit, tyrants like Mayor dumbass. 

But the libs think they have now found an unassailable excuse to steal your liberty ... they use "health" or "safety" or the "environment."  And under the rubric of these, they can enslave you.

The founders knew that there would always be people who would think NOTHING of stealing your liberty ... for your own good (at first.)  The way the idiot libs see it, you need their help but you're too stupid to realize it.  Therefore they find reasons under the umbrella of their Utopian rubric and pass laws that FORCE you to accept their help.

The part that puzzles me is, I know the libs want to be led around like sheep and I'm ok with it.  I know they don't mind giving up their own liberty and I'm ok with that too.  But why ... WHY, do they INSIST on me joining with them?  I am so sick of these shitstains, you have NO idea.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

What? China doesn't subscribe to the "warmers?"

Well, whaddya know.  The idiot Europeans thought they had brainwashed the entire world with their idiotic ideas on global warming.  They didn't realize that China wasn't on board with the "Great Ripoff," erm, I mean "Global warming," erm ... I mean "Climate Change." (LMAO)

In a well considered response to the "climate changer" morons, China has solved the standoff with the simple statement "go pound sand."  I'll bet even the genius libs can lower themselves to understand that.

(Reuters) - China will take swift counter-measures that could include impounding European aircraft if the EU punishes Chinese airlines for not complying with its scheme to curb carbon emissions, the China Air Transport Association said on Tuesday.

The warning came as the U.N.'s aviation body expressed concern about the growing threat of bilateral reprisals.

Chinese airlines, which have been told by Beijing not to comply with the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme, refused to meet a March 31 deadline for submitting carbon emissions data.

A new stand-off looms after EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said the carriers would have until the end of this week to submit their data or face enforcement action.

"Chinese airlines are unanimous on this. We won't provide the data," Wei Zhenzhong, secretary general of the China Air Transport Association, said on the sidelines of an International Air Transport Association (IATA) meeting in Beijing.

EU member states can fine airlines for non-compliance or carry out other reprisals including impounding aircraft.

"We would not like to see a situation of 'you hold up my planes and I hold yours'," Wei said. More here:

Ha ha @ "go ahead ... make my day, you idiots."

I know we're supposed to hate China but I love the fact they give no quarter whatsoever to this idiocy.  And thank God they don't.  

Perhaps they haven't been taught how to "seem smart" yet.  Have you noticed?  All these "global warming" morons think that appearing to be smart is the most important thing in life.  And the only way they know how to do that is to quote "facts" that are impossible to confirm.

Somehow quoting tried and true solutions  doesn't satisfy their need to appear smart.  Nope, they view established truth as hackneyed and "old hat."

Hey, here's my idea of the method China is using to teach the idiot-liberals.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Poor old Bank of America ... they're about to get swindled

Bank of America Corp. (BAC) said it will contribute $50 billion over the next 10 years to address climate change, the latest company to boost its investments toward environmental goals. 

The new set of goals will be effective on Jan. 1, following the anticipated completion of the bank's current 10-year pledge of $20 billion, which it said is four years ahead of schedule. "Environmental business delivers value to our clients, return for our shareholders, and helps strengthen the economy," said Chief Executive Brian Moynihan. "We met our prior goal in about half the time we set for ourselves, so more than doubling our target is ambitious but achievable."

 The bank's new initiative includes lending, equipment finance, capital markets and advisory activity and carbon finance, as well as advice and investment help. (Carbon finance -- lmao.)

Bank of America will focus on promoting energy efficiency; renewable energy, including wind, solar and hydropower; lower-carbon transportation like electric and hybrid vehicles; and water and waste treatment and disposal initiatives. More here:

Oh really? Yes, we must combat climate change.  Why?  Because it's the right thing to do.  I love how they position themselves as being charitable and contributing this $50 billion to the planet earth (and the media allow it without question.)

And why would they want to present themselves that way?  The only  way that would be good for their image is if people actually bought that line of total bullshit.  Are there people so stupid that they would believe this pantload?

Anyway, poor Bank of America ... it looks like they're taking an unreasonable chance with a lot of money .... investing in "green" companies and so forth ... very risky, eh?  

Unless ... unless they are going to provide loans to the green companies AFTER the green companies have secured loan guarantees from the federal government.  If that's the case, the bank cannot lose.

You know who else never loses in these deals?  The "green" company executives.  That's right, those guys arrange the loan guarantees from their politician buddies get the company financing and then get paid millions in salary/bonuses.  Then they turn around and give a cut to the politician who helped push the loan through.

Remember Solyndra?  Ever wonder how much those cronies contributed to Obama?  What?  You weren't aware of that?  Well, the media probably forgot to tell you ... or maybe the media didn't even know about it ... yes, that's probably it.  In any event, it happens all the time Solyndra was probably the only time that ever happened, right?  Just a fluke, right?

Anyway, the banks make money ... the corporate execs leave with millions ... the politicians make money ... and where does it all come from?  Who is it that is paying and paying and paying, for nothing?  

Lmao ... "climate change."  Just the latest thing they use to separate you from your money.  HEE HAW ... HEE HAW!!  Keep voting for "Democratics."

LMAO - the "Democratics" just keep crushing you

The recent recession wiped out nearly two decades of Americans’ wealth, according to government data released Monday, with ­middle-class families bearing the brunt of the decline.

Over a span of three years, Americans watched progress that took almost a generation to accumulate evaporate. The promise of retirement built on the inevitable rise of the stock market proved illusory for most. Homeownership, once heralded as a pathway to wealth, became an albatross. More here:

Hmmmm ... what was the cause of this "recession?"   Oh, right .... unfettered capitalism.  What we need are more rules and regulations and tinkering by government. 

And, we need more government departments to come around to our homes and businesses to do the checking up ... and writing the rules and so forth ... you know ... so we average dumbasses don't have to worry our little heads over it.

Remember, the lib's answer to everything is "more government."  That's right, and even though we've been growing the government at a ridiculous rate, it still isn't enough ... no, even though they rake in more than ever before in history, they STILL need "revenue enhancements."  

And now the government is everywhere ... in our homes, light bulbs, toilets, and lives (unfettered government.)

Well, we should all probably pay "our fair share."  THEN we'd be alright ... and the government would FINALLY have enough money ... right?

Hey, but don't worry, Obama is blocking oil and coal everywhere he possibly can because, you know ...he's a helper.  Gotta bankrupt those evil coal companies.

Monday, June 11, 2012

Coming soon ... the "debt ceiling" issue ... again

You might be asking yourself ... why do we have a debt ceiling anyway?  What does it do for us?

Actually, that's a very good question.  Allow me to give you my thoughts on it.

1) Having a debt ceiling ensures that our politicians won't go apeshit and put us in a debt situation from which we cannot recover without bankruptcy crushing our country for ourselves and our progeny ... i.e. fiscal responsibility.

2) Without a solid debt ceiling, congress can effectively raise your taxes without passing a law to raise your taxes.  For example ... let's say you have an 18-year old son living at home and you get him his own credit card (in your name of course.)  And he has an allowance/budget of $100 per month he is allowed to charge on the card (and you will pay it for him.)

One day he/she comes to you and says he wants you to give him $1500 cash so he can buy a big TV.  You refuse but he just charges it on the credit card instead.  And you'll be forced to pay for it because it's in your name.  It's that simple.

The Democratics want to spend your money but you won't allow them to raise taxes ... so instead, they just borrow more money (raise the debt ceiling)  ... and guess what ... you'll be paying for it.  Sure, your monthly/yearly payments might not go up but you'll be paying anyway.  And they're flushing the money down the toilet by giving it to their green-energy cronies ... who bankrupt their "companies" and then they leave with millions.

So it's like crashing your car without insurance and you still have payments left.  You're paying and paying but you have NO CAR.  THEY'RE CRUSHING YOU!!

If they stuck to their debt ceiling they wouldn't be able to steal your money with abandon.  Oh, and they're stealing your children's money too because no way will you EVER pay for this in your lifetime.   And the funniest part is, they (the Democratics) don't care.

Meanwhile, when is the last time they passed a budget?  This year? Answer: No. 
Last year? Answer: No.
The year before? Answer: No.
The past budget was passed in 2009 ... and since then they've been on a spending spree like never before in history.  And it's all free, right?  This won't affect you, right?

The EVIL Republicans have submitted budget after budget but Harry Reid/the Democratics won't allow a vote on it.   Why is that, do you wonder?

Obama & the Democratics ... crushing America

( - Since President Barack Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, the Federal Reserve’s holdings of U.S. government debt have quintupled, according to the Fed’s official monthly balance sheet.

On Jan. 28, 2009, a week after Obama’s nomination, the Fed owned $302 billion in U.S. Treasury securities. On April 25, 2012, the latest date reported, the Fed owned five and a half time that much in U.S. Treasury securities--$1.668 trillion. 

That is an increase from January 2009 of $1.366 trillion—or 452 percent. More here:

Hmmm, you mean we're buying our OWN bonds (debt) instead of selling them to China, Japan, etc?  

I guess that's ok, right?   I mean, what's the difference?  Hey, is it ok if I vote?  Where's the booth?

LMAO @ the "Democratics" are crushing America ... unbeknownst to the average American.  And when they're done, they'll blame it on capitalism and the the sheep will follow right along.  Because there are SOME people who can't appreciate the idea of freedom until they've been enslaved for a few generations.  And those people get to vote too.

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Saturday, June 9, 2012


I mean, sure, keep repeating yourself until it becomes true but when even the MSM stops supporting you, it might be time to call it a day. Just sayin'...

On identifying idiot liberals

Liberals are brainwashed souls. 

They regurgitate whatever they see in the lib media, movies, TV shows etc. They have very few original thoughts ... and ALL of them fancy themselves as genius psychologists. 

I've been noting some behaviors and language that identifies an idiot-liberal and put some of them here for your amusement.

These are some of the buzz-word/phrases/behaviors that idiot-liberals use in their daily lives. 

Also, be watchful for politicians using these because you can be sure that they are trying to relieve you of your hard-earned money and make you feel good about it ... "Hey, it's for the children." 


If you are constantly "treating yourself for once" 

If you are constantly finding (and sharing) "profound" phrases and repeating them to your friends (who also can't tell "profound" from "a hole in the ground.") 

If you hate mimes and, whenever you spot one, you make sure that everyone within 100 feet knows it. 

If you find yourself referring to any military/police unit as "elite." 

If you act like you've discovered a key to the universe after learning anything, no matter how small (but only when in presence of others.) 

If you think spending billions for safety measures which save 50 people a year is a smart investment. 

If you think that "society" should be able to take/steal my money in the name of "the greater good." 


And how does that make you feel? 

It's time to give something back (as if you took something you didn't deserve.) 

Any sentence which which includes the phrase "so many levels." i.e. "That's just wrong ... on so many levels." 

The cause of _______ is low self esteem (or global warming.) Note: in the 70's this was "global cooling."

It's not about ___A___ , it's about ___B___.  (Note: This is their new number-one go-to statement.  You will notice an idiot-lib can't go two seconds without lecturing your dumbass and telling you what "it's about.")

The reality is ______. 

There was a "study" ... And what they FOUND was ______. 

 ___A___ is the new ___B___ 

I'm going to "allow myself" ... I gave myself permission

I'm doing this for ME ... I deserve it ... I'm WORTH IT! (as if this is a recent revelation or something.)

I was all like ... or he was all like

________ another human being.

This isn't a diet, it's a journey ... a change in lifestyle.

I need closure.

What laws will we pass, what money will we spend, to prevent this from EVER HAPPENING AGAIN? 

I've been diagnosed with -- (insert fake disease here) examples - ADHD, Fibromyalgia, Depression, etc 

If you have a habit of putting the word "big" before saying "oil, pharma, tobacco, insurance, banks," etc (Note, somehow the libs never associate "big" with "government.") 

If you think you have different "parts of you" and say things like "Part of me thinks ____." 

Thank you so much for sharing that. 

Blah, blah, blah ... "the Planet Earth." (aka "The Planet.) ... i.e "We MUST save the planet." or "I'm a citizen of Planet Earth." 

If even one person is saved, it will all have been worth it.

Anyway .. those are just a few ways to identify an idiot lib in your midst.  I shall keep adding to the list and post some more one day.  Feel free to make your suggestions in the comments.

Ingrate liberals steal some property and hate having to give it back

A couple immediately realised something was missing when they returned home and looked out of their back window... 93ft of their garden.

Mike Gibb and his wife Susan Bates say that while they were on holiday in Crete a brick wall was demolished and two trees and two flowerbeds ripped up.

In their place was a wooden fence blocking off a 3ft by 31ft section of their garden.

The couple have now complained to their local council who could prosecute property developer Brendon Sherry, 53, who owns the land next door.

Mum-of-two Susan, 59, said: “We were in utter shock when we returned home. They had removed two 100 year-old trees, a lovely wall and two beds.

“It’s just shocking. These building firms think no one will stand up to them. But we will fight back.

“We’ve lived here for 20 years and this land has always been ours. They say the land is theirs, but we have seen no proof.” More here:

Ok, so someone owned an empty lot and allowed this couple to use part of it for 20 years.  At the end of the 20 years the owner decides to use the land himself and this couple of idiot-libs think they deserve a "say" in the whole thing.  What a couple of ingrate jackasses.

This is exactly why people who own empty lots don't let other people make use of them whatsoever.  Because, instead of being able to just make use of their property as they see fit, all of a sudden some lawyer is making justification to a judge about how you allowed it for so long.  They call this "implied consent."  In other words, if someone starts using your property and you don't object, then SOMEHOW that means you meant to give it to them forever ... see how that makes sense?

Anyway, I love how the reporter makes the actual property owner out to be a bad guy ... NOT the morons who used the property without permission, no ... they are the poor, poor "victims of evil."

I'm confused about "cooking" meth

MEHLVILLE (KMOX) - A woman was caught cooking meth in her purse using a 20-ounce soda bottle inside of the Walmart store on Telegraph Road at I-255.

The store was immediately evacuated, out of fear for customers’ safety.

St. Louis County Police Lt. Mark Cox said if the meth concoction had spilled or leaked, it would have quickly circulated through the store’s ventilation system, contaminating the building and sickening lots of people. More here:

Oh please.  Does anyone believe ANY of this story? 

"Cooking meth in her purse?"  Please correct me if I'm wrong but don't you typically need high heat or a flame for cooking?  Or is the jourrrrnalist using the word cooking like a pregnant woman uses "I've got one in the oven?"  Because the jourrrrrnalist is tossing this word "cooking meth" around as if everyone is familiar with the procedure used for making meth.  Is there heat being generated by a chemical reaction inside the bottle?

The story indicates she was initially detained for shoplifting but I don't know if I buy that excuse ... after all, she DID have a 20 ounce soda bottle ... where was Mayor Bloomberg?

Also, don't you love how they evacuate the entire store?  Oh yes ... someone MAY have gotten a little sickened if the "concoction had spilled or leaked" ... but I seriously doubt it.  My guess is it would smell extry bad and peeps would avoid the area without having to be told to evacuate ... and this goes for people who are so stupid as to shoplift whilst "cooking meth" in their purse.

In any event, Walmart takes no chances with very dangerous things which may affect their profits (such as lawyers.) That's right, lawyers, who would immediately seize on the "knew or should have known" legal premise to siphon off some of Walmart's profits teach Walmart to put safety first.  Of course, Walmart just pays these lawsuits out of their profits and would never raise prices in order to cover legal costs ... therefore it doesn't cost me a thing when lawyers sue evil companies like Walmart.  Sooooo, WHEW, cuz that would be a LOT.