Saturday, November 30, 2013

Would the Democratics use the IRS to silence the people?

Bill Elliot voted for Obama. 

He was a cancer patient who lost his insurance due to ObamaCare and couldn’t pay the expensive new premiums. More (with video) here:

Then he was interviewed by Fox News about the problem.

Suddenly, he's being audited by the IRS. How about that? 

The IRS ... to me, they're like the "health department" (or any other government agency.)  If they want to find something wrong, they will. They have thousands and thousands of rules and regulations for you to follow ... and they're changing all the time.  They know the rules and you don't ... and if they want to, they can make up rules on the spot.  Are YOU going to argue with them?

Hey, but don't worry, the IRS hasn't come after anyone else who disagrees with the government ... no, it's just Bill.  The rest of us have nothing to worry about. 

H/T Wombat

Friday, November 22, 2013

The news media, they'd NEVER be one-sided about an issue

So Wombat linked me to an article in the NYT about the recent "rules change" regarding filibusters in the senate.  I noticed the following sentence:

"The decision to press the button on the so-called nuclear option was no doubt cathartic for a Democratic majority driven to distraction by Republican obstructionism."

LOL ... The filibuster is "Republican obstructionism." And what did this honorable and forthright jourrrnalist have to say when the Democratics were holding up Bush's nominees?

Answer: Not a damn thing and I'll tell you why.  You see, it wasn't "obstructionist" then.  Got that?  Sheep?

Of course, if the Republicans ever take back control of the Senate, the Democratics will start with the squealing and the media will be amplifying the squeals.  And who loses in all this?  I ask you, who loses when "the majority rules?"

And what did Obama and the Democratics have to say about this when the Republicans threatened to do it years ago?  I guess the media doesn't know about this ... otherwise they'd be screaming hypocrisy from the rooftops, no? H/T Wombat for the video embed code.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

What's this? The government lied about unemployment?

In the home stretch of the 2012 presidential campaign, from August to September, the unemployment rate fell sharply — raising eyebrows from Wall Street to Washington.

The decline — from 8.1 percent in August to 7.8 percent in September — might not have been all it seemed. The numbers, according to a reliable source, were manipulated.

And the Census Bureau, which does the unemployment survey, knew it.

Just two years before the presidential election, the Census Bureau had caught an employee fabricating data that went into the unemployment report, which is one of the most closely watched measures of the economy.

And a knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and continues today.  More here:

"Continues today."  And what are YOU gonna do about it, sheep?  Huh?  The same thing as you're doing about being spied on by the government?  Yeah, that's what I thought.

The government ... covering  up the real unemployment numbers ... who would have guessed?  What next?  We find they're lying about the inflation numbers?  Or our health care costs? Oh, not to worry, they're only doing it for our own good.

Health care costs ... and every five minutes on TV I see some law firm suing some medical company and urging others to pile on.  I'll bet that doesn't affect health care costs in the slightest.  Is the government trying to stop that fraud?  Answer: No.

But wait ... do you mean to tell me the economy sucks?  It sucks worse than it ever has?  I don't get it ... the government has been telling me "the recession's over" for what feels like ten years ... even though I'm much worse off  ... and despite record tax revenue, the country is deeper in debt than ever before.  Nossir, I just don't get it.  Very mysterious.  Unless ... THE EVIL RICH still aren't paying their fair share ... that must be it.

Anyone want to give odds on whether the liars/cheaters will lose their government jobs?

There's another aspect to this news that's even more puzzling.  No matter how many facts like this come out, it never phases the thinking of the Democratics tyrants ... no ... they remain fixed.  You must go along with them, you must believe them ... you must surrender your money and liberty to them "for the greater good."  

Don't you see?  The greater good is more important than your individual liberty.  Give them your freedom ... they're smarter than you ... they're more benevolent than you ... overcome your racist greed, jackass ... you're in the way.

Friday, November 15, 2013

Raging communist struck by conscience?

Thursday, MSNBC's Alec Baldwin once again exposed his anti-gay hate. This time he called a photographer a "c**ksucking f*g." Earlier this year, Baldwin used his Twitter account to hurl homophobic slurs and threats at a reporter. The media gave Baldwin a pass then, and appears ready to do the same again today. Andrew Sullivan is one of the few on the left willing to call both Baldwin and the media out for their hypocrisy: More here:

Ha ha, what a dumbass. After 40 years of being a drummer in the liberal fife corp, this guy (Andrew Sullivan) suddenly gets a conscience? Hasn't Baldwin done this over and over again?  Suddenly it's "enough."  I guess it's once for conservatives and a hundred times for libs, right, Andrew Sullivan?

FYI - Andrew Sullivan used to write for the New York Times (and other ultra liberal rags) so he's used to the sheep following and bleating along.  It's probably going to upset him no end when he finds that liberals NEVER know where to draw the line ... whether they're protecting the people who are stealing your freedom and money or misleading the public with their "news," the liberal knows no boundaries.

Hey, didn't MSNBC just give this Baldwin asswipe his own talk show?  Interesting, no?

The founding fathers - made me go "Ha" outloud

The libs identified a racist

H/T Wombat

Monday, November 11, 2013

Unknown Philosopher

H/T Wombat

Friday, November 8, 2013

Scumballs get busted

Three people in Virginia, including a DMV employee, pleaded guilty this week to conspiring to get state IDs or driver's licenses for at least 300 illegal immigrants. 

Noemi Barboza pleaded guilty on Thursday to "a bribery conspiracy charge, admitting that she often drove illegal immigrants to the Fairfax DMV location where an employee would approve their applications for driver’s licenses, learner’s permits, and identification cards knowing they could not prove legal presence in the United States." Four people engaged in the scheme from 2007 to 2011. The fourth person has not yet been charged. 
The illegal immigrants paid Barboza's husband or another person, who then reportedly "split the money with" Maria Cavallaro, a 45-year-old DMV employee. Cavallaro and Barboza’s husband, 42-year-old Jose Calderon, "pleaded guilty to their roles Wednesday, admitting they helped obtain documents for as many as 300 people and netted tens of thousands of dollars for themselves." More here:

Can you IMAGINE THAT?  Enriching themselves by assisting criminal illegal aliens.  Tsk tsk, *shakes head.*  They must have thought they were congressmen.

And while I'm at it, why is the word "may" on this sign?

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Remember this idiot? "The Meathead"

ROB REINER: "Obama right now, where Obama is is right around where Reagan was, right around where Nixon was. There, he’s no more left than those, those, those Republicans." Video here:

Yes.   Obama ... Reagan ... same difference.

Reagan: "Government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem."

So it makes sense that Reagan would try to solve our probems with government intervention ... just like Obama does.  See how similar they are?

Yes, it's all clear now.  Who knew that Rob Reiner was such a genius?  He is able to see the truth.

And now the FBI goes lib

So I was reading about this guy who shot up the LAX airport.  During my reading I came across the legal statement of some jackass FBI agent.

In his statement he says things like "He pulled an assault rifle out of his bag" and "He had five magazine clips for his assault rifle."

You see, using the term "assault rifle" is MUCH better than just saying "weapon" or "rifle" ... you know why?  Because the media has brainwashed the public/potential jury pool (and apparently this pea-brained FBI agent) into thinking assault rifle=WITCHY WEAPON!!

Plus, I think we can all agree, he'd deserve a much lessor punishment if his rifle had been "regular" instead of "assault" ... right?

Sometimes I just have to shake my head.  I don't know about you but I expected a LOT more from an FBI agent than the regurgitation of mainstream media pablum.  Think about it ... we count on them to protect our freedom ... not jump in bed with the very assholes who are stealing it.

I have other questions:
1 - How long will it be before one of the crapstains in the media imply the shooter was "Tea Party?"

2 - Why does the agent cite "Title 18" of the united states code when filing the complaint?  It says, in part "... killing ... any officer or employee of the United States ... government ... while such officer or employee is engaged in or on account of the performance of  their official duties."

I mean, I'm no lawyer but WTF difference should it make wether:
a) the victim is a government employee
b) if they're engaged in "official duties" at the time of the shooting?

The guy's dead ... right?

I'll tell you why the law is written with all the unecessary crap in it ... so the lawyers can get rich parsing it and peel you like the idiots you are.  THAT'S RIGHT, you're idiots ... for voting people into office who promote this insanity.  The part I like best is how our intellectual betters "harrumph" and congratulate themselves about how smart they are for writing the laws like this ... oh it's so crucial.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

How can you tell she's a "Democratic?"

A Chicago alderwoman wants to charge a $25 licensing fee for bicycle owners and require them to take an hour-long safety class.

Pat Dowell's proposal could generate up to $10 million a year if 400,000 cyclists buy the license. Dowell thinks the city should implement it instead of a heightened tax on cable television that's been proposed by the mayor.

The South Side alderwoman says bike riders should pay for increasing number of protected bike lanes on city streets. More here:

What?  I thought the libs didn't like television. I thought they LOVED bikes.  What a topsy turvy world!  Of course, your average couch spud (like Pat Dowell) doesn't like to see any increase in their cable bill ... especially if it's increasing due to a "tax."

I love it though, with these libs ... it's never enough, is it.  Tax and tax and tax and it's NEVER enough.

Something else with the libs ... even though you don't ask for the government to "provide" things, they take it upon themselves to do so anyway.  And then, later on it dawns on them "Hey, we can tax the idiots for this!"

Like health care ... first the government decides they're going to pay for everyone's health care by paying their bills in "emergencies" and then they turn around and tell you "Hey, you have to pay more because of the deadbeats."  And all the libs nod in unison because "bahhhhh, oh yeah ... we forgot about that."