USA Today Vote

Some friends of mine alerted me to this via email.  So the USA Today is taking a poll on whether or not the 2nd amendment gives "individuals" the right to bear arms.

Obama's new Attorney General, Eric Holder,  has already said this is one of his major issues.  Hopefully these results will be published later this month. This upcoming year will become critical for gun owners with the Supreme Court's accepting the District of Columbia case against the right for individuals to bear arms.

You can click here to vote.  You can copy/paste the url below (into an email) to your friends if you think they aren't idiot libs may be interested in voting.

http://evil-klown.blogspot.com/2010/01/usa-today-vote.html

Join me in bidding them a fond adieu

Excerpts from AirAmerica ... or should I say "Air UN-America."  Bold is mine.

It is with the greatest regret, on behalf of our Board, that we must announce that Air America Media is ceasing its live programming operations as of this afternoon, and that the Company will file soon under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code to carry out an orderly winding-down of the business.

*Sniff -- Such a shame -- sooooo UNDESERVED!!

The very difficult economic environment has had a significant impact on Air America's business. This past year has seen a "perfect storm" in the media industry generally. National and local advertising revenues have fallen drastically, causing many media companies nationwide to fold or seek bankruptcy protection.

Yes, like Hannity, Limbaugh, and Levin ... they're getting CRUSHED.  Crushed with the money coming in, that is.

Those companies that remain are facing audience fragmentation as a result of new media technologies, are often saddled with crushing debt, and have generally found it difficult to obtain operating or investment capital from traditional sources of funding.

"Traditional sources of funding?" You mean like PROFIT?  Leave it to libs to decry "lack of funding."  Hey, dipsticks, try making a profit instead of looking for "traditional sources of funding."  Whatsammatta, daddy George Soros won't cough up any money to "fund" your operations?  That's what I love about you libs ... you revile the rich and vilify corporations, all the while asking for their money to be transferred to YOU ... as if somehow you DESERVE it  ... disgusting, hypocritical, bags of freegan.

In this climate, our painstaking search for new investors has come close several times right up into this week, but ultimately fell short of success.

Ok, but you've been going broke since day one (2004.)  You've never made a profit.  What was it about the "climate" back then that made you go broke?  Never mind, I forgot, the history knowledge of a lib only goes back to breakfast.

When Air America Radio launched in April, 2004 with already-known personalities like Al Franken and then-unknown future stars like Rachel Maddow, it was the only full-time progressive voice in the mainstream broadcast media world.

Huh?  "The only full time progressive voice?"   What about NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR?  Oh ... wait ... those aren't "progressive," they're "objective." How stupid of me.

Anyway, I bid you a fond adieu adios, asshats.

Hitler Finds Out Scott Brown Won MA Senate Seat

Whoever is doing the hitler thing he is doing it well

fri pins

oops sorry its late

Dipshit lib keeps proving he's an idiot

On Wednesday’s Countdown show, MSNBC host Keith Olbermann defended his recent attacks on Massachusetts Republican Senator-elect Scott Brown by insisting that some of the incorrect claims he made are true when, in fact, two are factually without merit while the third represents one of Olbermann’s typical episodes of distorting the words of a target. Among other complaints, Olbermann on Wednesday claimed that Scott "swore at" high school students at an assembly in 2007, that he has refused to renounce a vulgar threat made against Attorney General Martha Coakley by an audience member at a Sunday rally, and that he demonstrated racism in once suggesting that he wasn’t sure if Barack Obama’s parents were married at the time of his birth.

The Countdown host repeated a myth promoted by the liberal blog bluemassgroup.com that, in February 2007, then-State Senator Scott "swore at a hall full of high school students" as he appeared before a group at King Philip Regional High School in Wrentham, Massachusetts. In reality, Scott was not alleged to have "sworn at" the students, but rather, he angrily responded to and complained about vulgar comments that some students had written about him and one of his daughters – comments which had been posted on the Facebook page of a pro-gay rights teacher at the school – as Scott read the uncensored comments from the site, naming some of the students, in front of the assembly. His actions sparked criticismbecause he read aloud the profane words as they appeared on the Facebook page, but he was not alleged to have "sworn at" the students. Read more at Newbusters:

So, how's he doing in the ratings?  I thought you'd never ask.

CABLE NEWS RACE
TUES. JAN. 19, 2010
ELECTION NIGHT

FOXNEWS HANNITY 6,809,000
FOXNEWS GRETA 6,399,000
FOXNEWS O'REILLY 5,228,000
FOXNEWS BECK 3,446,000
FOXNEWS BAIER 3,338,000
FOXNEWS SHEP 3,241,000
CNN KING 1,681,000
CNN COOPER 1,508,000
CNN BROWN 1,308,000
MSNBC DIPSHIT OLBERMANN 1,274,000
MSNBC MADDOW 1,236,000
CNN BLITZER 1,135,000
CNNHN BEHAR 845,000
MSNBC HARDBALL 798,000 (Ha ha, Way to go, Chris Matthews you fucking idiot.)

Communist genius finds reason for Haiti earthquake

Russia Today: Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez has once again accused the United States of playing God. But this time it's Haiti's disastrous earthquake that he thinks the U.S. was behind. Spanish newspaper ABC quotes Chavez as saying that the U.S. navy launched a weapon capable of inducing a powerful earthquake off the shore of Haiti. He adds that this time it was only a drill and the final target is ... destroying and taking over Iran. More (with video) here:

Pay attention now, his genius is hard to follow

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Ha ha, Oh MAN! This is a perfect example of Dipshitocrats COMPLETELY IGNORING THE OBVIOUS because they need to find the "deeper meaning" ... you know, because they're geniuses. Seriously, these libs are insane and yet, people vote for them.

This just goes to show, you can smack a Dipshitocrat in the teeth with "the bat of truth" (REPEATEDLY) and they still don't know their teeth are out ... bleeding all over themselves they refuse to declare "it's only a flesh wound" and instead they declare VICTORY.

D'OH !! Don't give them an opening like that !!

A little history of the filibuster

Wecentwy, Bawney Fwank (Dipshitocwat wepwesentative fwom Massachusetts) called for changing the senate rules wegarding fiwibusters. 

I notice he never called for that when the Dipshitocrats were filibustering EVERY LAST ONE of George Bush's judicial nominees ... do YOU recall him doing that? No? Funny huh, I guess he had a recent revelation or something because we all know how perverted fair and impartial he is.

Here's the deal.  When filibusters first started, the senate couldn't vote until it stopped.  Of course, in those days, they had to actually keep talking and eventually they'd get tired of it ...  or the other side would drop their attempt at passing the law.

Later on (1917) they changed the rules so they could stop a filibuster with a two-thirds vote of the senate (cloture.) That would be 67 votes today.  After a while of that they changed the rules AGAIN (1975) to allow cloture with a three-fifths vote (which is the 60 votes we have today.)  At some point in there they even changed the rules so that they didn't even have to keep talking during a filibuster ... they only had to THREATEN to do it.  All of these things which weakened  the filibuster have been bad for the nation (IMHO.)

Now that the Republicans are using the filibuster health care bill is in jeopardy, they want to change it again (see Bawney Fwank's call above.)  See, this bill is such a massive (and permanent) power grab, the Dipshitocrats are willing to trash a lot of history (and anything else that gets in their way) to make their dream come true.  This isn't about the "good of America" or they'd never entertain the thought of cramming a bill down your throat on a one-vote margin in the senate.  How is it that the good of 51 votes overrides the good of 49 votes?  That's why a simple majority should NEVER be good enough in the senate.

Anyway, I wish they'd have stuck with the 67 vote requirement for cloture.  The government NEVER did as much damage as quickly when they actually had to have a lot of agreement before passing controversial laws like this GIANT PIECE OF CRAP health care bill they're passing now.  Once they got the three-fifths in 1975 they started doing real damage.  Imagine what they could do with simple majorities.

Mark Levin often quotes former Senator Paul Laxalt (R-NV) "Every day congress meets you lose a little bit more of your liberty." The other day I heard Mark say something to the effect of "Maybe we should just allow them to meet every other year."

Excerpts below from Time.com

The filibuster, long seen by its proponents as a necessary check on power and by its critics as a frustrating waste of time, has been around since the mid-19th century. A filibuster simply allows the minority political party to choose to endlessly debate a bill, stalling — and sometimes preventing — an actual vote. The word comes from the Dutch term vrijbuiter (pirate), in addition to the Spanish word filibustero (freebooting). The origins of filibuster use trace back to ancient Rome, and the practice has been common in several other countries including England and Australia. In the U.S., the tactic became known as a label for a Senator who held his colleagues hostage by overtalking legislation. Originally, both the Senate and the House of Representatives had a rule called the Previous Question Motion, where a simple majority ended debate — a rule the House has kept. But the Senate dropped this provision in 1806, leaving open the potential for a filibuster.

The first filibuster in U.S. Senate history began on March 5, 1841, over the issue of the firing of Senate printers, and lasted six days. Ever since, politicians have loved filibusters or hated them — depending which side of the fight they were on. Proponents argue the filibuster protects the right to free speech and prevents the Senate majority from steamrolling the minority, thus ensuring that critical legislation gets a sufficient airing before being pushed through. Others contend the practice has gotten out of hand, leaving bills gridlocked in an oft-feuding Senate and stalling important votes for purely partisan gain.

The longest uninterrupted filibuster on record belongs to South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, who stopped a vote on a 1957 civil rights bill for 24 hours and 18 minutes. A filibuster is often an effort of several Senators, but can also be done by a single Senator.

The only way to stop one is by invoking cloture — which forces a vote to take place. Cloture, adopted in 1917, used to require two-thirds of the Senate to agree to stop the talking. But with a two-thirds vote difficult to obtain (just four out of 23 cloture movements were successful between 1919 and 1960), the Senate changed the rule in 1975 to require just three-fifths' approval. More here:

The Future of Western War

Very well written "explanation" of war's changing nature over thousands of years.

But where exactly are we today? There have been two developments over the last 20 years that have placed the West in a new cycle. They have not marked the end of the Western way of war, but they have brought about a significant change. The first is the rapid electronic dissemination of knowledge—such that someone in the Hindu Kush tonight can download a sophisticated article on how to make an IED. And the second is that non-Western nations now have leverage, given how global economies work today, through large quantities of strategic materials that Western societies need, such as natural gas, oil, uranium, and bauxite. Correspondingly, these materials produce tremendous amounts of unearned capital in non-Western countries—and by "unearned," I mean that the long process of civilization required to create, for example, a petroleum engineer has not occurred in these countries, yet they find themselves in possession of the monetary fruits of this process. So the West's enemies now have instant access to knowledge and tremendous capital.
In addition to these new developments, there are five traditional checks on the Western way of war that are intensified today. One of these checks is the Western tendency to limit the ferocity of war through rules and regulations. The Greeks tried to outlaw arrows and catapults. Romans had restrictions on the export of breast plates. In World War II, we had regulations against poison gas. Continuing this tradition today, we are trying to achieve nuclear non-proliferation. Unfortunately, the idea that Western countries can adjudicate how the rest of the world makes war isn't applicable anymore. As we see clearly in Iran, we are dealing with countries that have the wealth of Western nations (for the reasons just mentioned), but are anything but constitutional democracies. In fact, these nations find the idea of limiting their war-making capabilities laughable. Even more importantly, they know that many in the West sympathize with them—that many Westerners feel guilty about their wealth, prosperity, and leisure, and take psychological comfort in letting tyrants like Ahmadinejad provoke them.


Entire speech here.

From Imprimis at Hillsdale.edu
I HIGHLY recommend you subscribe (it's free).

Jourrrrrnalist is so stupid he can't see his own bias

I forget the names of the jourrrrrnalists involved here but I was just watching the news and the lady asks another jourrrrnalist what's going on in the Massachusetts senate race.  The guy says something like "Well, if Coakley loses then the health care bill might be dead ... (and then he asks the audience) are YOU ok with this one vote deciding the issue for ALL of America? ... we'll be right back."

Ok, here's the call.  I guess this DIPSHIT JOURRRRNALIST wouldn't have a problem if Coakley was elected and her "ONE VOTE" decided the issue the other way for the "REST OF AMERICA" or "ALL OF AMERICA" ... whatever the hell it was he said. 

See, this was my problem.  They were going to squander TRILLIONS of dollars by ONE VOTE.   They were going to shove this massive program right down the throats of "the rest of America" ... and that was PERFECTLY ok.  They didn't have ANY PROBLEM WHATSOEVER in doing that ... but now that it might go the other way .. now they have a BIG PROBLEM because sudden-fucking-ly, it's "just one vote." Hee Haw - Hee Haw ... Libs ... they are com-ass-pletely unencumbered with logic and rational thought.

While I'm on the subject, I saw Matt Lauer this morning (on the Today Show) refer to "Kennedy's seat."  I've already posted this video but ... "IT'S NOT KENNEDY'S SEAT, JACKASS." As Wombat says, "Maybe Lauer doesn't watch the news." Yes, or maybe it's because libs NEVER miss a chance to brainwash the sheep.  Baaa - bleat.

Kerry the jackass brays with abandon

I'm amazed at how many Democratic politicians are using the word 'teabag' to fire up their constituents. Chuck Schumer proudly called Republican candidate Scott Brown a "far-right teabagger" earlier in the race, and now it appears Sen. Kerry is following suit.

"We also see how revved up the tea baggers are at the thought of hijacking health care reform and every chance we have at making progress in Washington." warned Kerry this morning. More at washingtonexaminer.com

Found it at HotAir:

See, this is what I love about the respect Dipshitocrats give to oppossing viewpoints.  You're nothing but a "teabagger" ... get it?  You mean nothing, you're simply an obstacle, and an undereducated one at that. Never mind the fact that we're dumping the tea. Ohhhh, that tea is gonna get soggy.

Zogby prediction - he's such a genius

John Zogby Coakley Win
by hotairpundit

I just posted this so nobody gets amnesia about Zogby and his ability to predict things. Remember this whenever you hear about a "Zogby Poll." I actually participate in his polls and the questions are so slanted to the left it's ridiculous.  The Klown predicts that Scott Brown will win by a decent margin ... and by "decent margin" I mean more than the "landslide" margin the media called Obama's win.  Anyway, I guess we'll see, won't we.

Here's another question.  If Scott Brown wins how far will the libs go in trying to block the certification of the election?  I guarantee that will be the next fight.  Prepare for the forthright and honest lawyers.

"Freegans", a whole new line of humor for the Klown

So I wake up last night and that cartoon that makes fun of libs (The Goode Family) was on. Mr. Goode was supposed to be organizing a block party for libs. Somehow they found out that one of their heroes was going to be "walking through" their town during the block party. It was some doofus that left his wife and six kids and became a "freegan."

This morning I Googled "Freegan."

Freeganism is an anti-consumerist lifestyle whereby people employ alternative living strategies based on "limited participation in the conventional economy and minimal consumption of resources".

Freegans "embrace community, generosity, social concern, freedom, cooperation, and sharing in opposition to a society based on materialism, moral apathy, competition, conformity, and greed."[1] The lifestyle involves salvaging discarded, unspoiled food from supermarket dumpsters, known as 'dumpster diving'. Freegans salvage the food for political reasons, rather than out of need.

Yes. Have you noticed anything? Here's what I noticed. Conspicuously absent in any of this is "they don't have fucking jobs." I was going to help them by pointing it out to the morons libs at Wikipedia but I felt they'd probably ignore my suggestions. You see, to be a successful lib, you have to ignore the obvious and make up your own "deeper meaning."

When I was a kid, we had freegans too.  It's just that my parents didn't teach me the correct term.  We called them bums.  Anyway, prepare yourselves for me to overdo this.  It seems like a potentially rich source of humor.  Hey, I've got one already ... "I hate those freegin' freegans."

Here's a couple of clips from the show (The Goode Family) for your entertainment.

A Heartfelt Sentiment

Courtesy of The Beaner!

Ohhhh, man -- SMACKDOWN

By Noel Sheppard at Newsbusters:

A rather remarkable thing happened Thursday: a documentary highly skeptical of man's role in global warming was aired on broadcast television.

The program, "Global Warming - The Other Side," was created and hosted by John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel, and debuted on San Diego's independent television station KUSI.

Readers should be familiar with Coleman as the man who not only called global warming "the greatest scam in history," but also advocated suing Nobel Laureate Al Gore to expose the fraud.

Breaking with American media's tradition of almost exclusively broadcasting programs supporting Gore's view of climate change, "The Other Side" remarkably devoted an entire hour to fully explaining what the global warming-obsessed press dishonestly hide from the public (videos in four parts, h/t Climate Depot):

Click here to see the videos.  The first one is just over 10 minutes.  Just the first one is enough to deal the death blow ... or, it would be if the mainstream media let the public know about it.

Jackass Ed Shultz at MSNBC - Listen to him bray

Have you heard one word about this?  No? ... and you won't either.  WAMK has a good point ... I wonder if you would have heard about it if Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity said something like this.  Yes, I wonder, don't you?

Found it at Where Are My Keys:  By the way, WAMK has some put up some really good posts over there recently.

Capitalists to celebrate defeat of communism?

Former Barack Obama supporter Jim Cramer on Friday said the stock market would have a huge rally if Scott Brown defeats Martha Coakley in Tuesday's special senatorial election in Massachusetts.

"I think investors who are nervous about the dictatorship of the Pelosi proletariat will feel at ease, and we could have a gigantic rally off a Coakley loss and a Brown win," said Cramer on Friday's "Mad Money."

The often outspoken CNBCer marvelously declared it a "Pelosi politburo emasculation"

From Newsbusters:

Gee ... ya THINK?  Imagine the stock rally we'd have if there were no more threat about Cap & Tax ... or GloBULL warming.  Imagine what would happen if we decided to "Drill Here, Drill Now."  Just wait until November. The liberals have been kicking America in the balls long enough.

Even MORE Globull warming horseshit - EXPOSED

(Simon Fraser/Science Photo Library)

A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it.

Two years ago the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a benchmark report that was claimed to incorporate the latest and most detailed research into the impact of global warming. A central claim was the world's glaciers were melting so fast that those in the Himalayas could vanish by 2035.

In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC's 2007 report.

It has also emerged that the New Scientist report was itself based on a short telephone interview with Syed Hasnain, a little-known Indian scientist then based at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi.

Hasnain has since admitted that the claim was "speculation" and was not supported by any formal research. If confirmed it would be one of the most serious failures yet seen in climate research. The IPCC was set up precisely to ensure that world leaders had the best possible scientific advice on climate change.

Professor Murari Lal, who oversaw the chapter on glaciers in the IPCC report, said he would recommend that the claim about glaciers be dropped: "If Hasnain says officially that he never asserted this, or that it is a wrong presumption, then I will recommend that the assertion about Himalayan glaciers be removed from future IPCC assessments." More timesonline:

Oh my, my. This certainly comes as a shocker, doesn't it? Hey, "Professor" Murari Lal ... nice job overseeing your portion of the world ripoff globull warming ... dipshit.  The best part is how they included this crap without checking.  I mean ... no need to check, right?  Just bray with abandon.

The Klown hates fatties with a white-hot hate

As the dieters queued to see how many pounds they had shed, the floor beneath them in the clinic in Växjö, in south-central Sweden, began to rumble, according to a report in The Local, Sweden's English-language newspaper.

"We suddenly heard a huge thud; we almost thought it was an earthquake and everything flew up in the air.

"The floor collapsed in one corner of the room and along the walls," one Weight Watchers participant told the Smålandsposten newspaper.

Soon, the fault lines spread around the room, and other sections of the floor gave way.

Luckily, all of the dieters escaped uninjured and managed to move the scales to the corridor, which was not damaged in the accident, and were able to complete their weekly weigh in.

The cause of the floor's collapse remains under investigation. From here:

Still under investigation, eh?  Yes, sounds like a mystery.  It may never be solved.