Al Gore is a braying jackass

The former US Vice-President, who became an unlikely figurehead for the green movement after narrating the Oscar-winning documentary An Inconvenient Truth, became entangled in a new climate change “spin” row. Yes, this is "spin." It's not an out and out lie. It's not an attempt to mislead. It's not AlGore trying to maintain his new zillionaire status from selling carbon credits. No ... it's none of these ... it's "spin."

Mr Gore, speaking at the Copenhagen climate change summit, stated the latest research showed that the Arctic could be completely ice-free in five years. Hee Haw - Hee Haw.

In his speech, Mr Gore told the conference: “These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years.” Mmmmm ... "FRESH-Uh" figures.

However, the climatologist whose work Mr Gore was relying upon dropped the former Vice-President in the water with an icy blast.

“It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.” Really? It's "unclear" to you? Funny, because it's clear to me ... AlGore is lying ... THAT'S how this figure was arrived at.

Mr Gore’s office later admitted that the 75 per cent figure was one used by Dr Maslowksi as a “ballpark figure” several years ago in a conversation with Mr Gore. More here:

Yes ... "ballpark" figures ... because actual figures aren't scary enough. This guy is a joke. It wasn't enough he tried every underhanded method of stealing an election in Florida. Now he's using the same bullshit with global warming ... in order to enrich himself. He is a LOATHSOME piece of shit.

The irony is that people still worship him. Of course, the way the world works, there is at least one more irony to be expected ... the fiery SUV/private plane crash. You know it's coming ... things just seem to work out that way.

Global Warming activist gets demolished

Lord Monckton issues a brutal ... BRUTAL beating to this "activist." I'm serious ... what a bloodbath. I'm guessing that 99% of the "activists" have about the same grip on global warming.

Thanks to Wombat, who brought this to my attention.

"Hockey Stick" graph - We're DOOMED!

Found it at Ace of Spades blog:

The Klown is humiliated ... again

So last week I switched my search engine/home page from Google to Bing in protest of Google's leftiness. Bing isn't as good. It seemed to me that it narrowed my search results too much. Wombat warned me about this but I didn't listen, I figured he was exaggerating ... he wasn't.

Also, I particularly hated the way Bing displayed their images when I did an image search. They return too many images on one page and my computer lags when scrolling through them. Google only returns a few at a time and you can "next page" as long as you want.

In addition to that, I like the blank page of Google with just the search bar with the tools strategically/inconspicuously placed. I decided to swallow my pride and return to Google until I can find a better search engine. It hurts me. Then again, I'm a conservative and therefore subject to the emotion of humiliation.

But Klown, you didn't have to tell anyone. You could have kept this to yourself.

Yes, I could have, but it wouldn't change the fact that I was wrong. Only idiot liberals think the approval of others is crucial to how they feel about themselves.

Homo's need fake love too

Nev. brothel aims to offer 1st male prostitutes

LAS VEGAS (AP) - The owner of a brothel more than two hours' drive from Las Vegas said she hopes to hire Nevada's first legal male prostitutes within a month, now that state health officials have approved a method to test men for infectious diseases.

The world is ready for women, or even other men, to legally buy sex, said Shady Lady Ranch owner Bobbi Davis. Plus, being the first to offer male service could boost business in tough economic times, she said.

"With so many other male revues going on in Vegas, we thought it was time to give this a try," Davis told The Associated Press. More here:

WHAT THE HELL? When I first saw this headline, I thought "oh, male prostitutes so the drunk babes can get laid too." Then I thought "when the hell has a drunk babe ever had difficulty getting laid? ... well, perhaps the really ugly ones have a tough time ... nope, not in my experience anyway."

Then I read a bit and I find out ... it's not really for the babes ... it's mostly for the disgusting homos. Can't those damn homos ever be satisfied without always trying to be equal with us heteros?

The recession is over, whew!

George Stephanopoulos, referring to an interview on December 13th, 2009: (Bold is mine.)

The President’s top economic advisor, Larry Summers, told me that “by spring employment growth will start turning positive.”

During my "This Week" interview, Summers said that “everybody agrees that the recession is over,” but he did not say when the unemployment rate could be expected to drop further. More here:

Ok, I sure hope so ... but I don't think so. I'd have to write for an hour to explain why but suffice it to say that the government is interfering in the economy like never before. They are printing money like never before. I thought Pelosi said this was going to be a "pay as you go" congress.

The thing that got us in this mess is the government FORCING banks to lend money to people who wouldn't pay it back. That lasted a little while but everyone knew the time was coming and now it's here. We're all shocked. Has the government changed those rules yet? No. Instead they're going to give another few billion to ACORN and their ilk.

I guess we shall see. I'm going to schedule this entry to post again next spring ... so nobody gets amnesia. Meanwhile, lets hope the big expert, Larry Summers is right.

Should say "Welcome to DemocratVille"

Hey ! STOP EXPOSING US !!!

Excerpts from this article:

A Stanford Professor has used United Nation security officers to silence a journalist asking him “inconvenient questions” during a press briefing at the climate change conference in Copenhagen.

During some testy exchanges with McAleer, UN officials and Professor Schneider’s assistants twice tried to cut short McAleer’s question.

However as the press conference drew to a close Professor Schneider’s assistant called armed UN security guards to the room. They held McAleer and aggressively ordered cameraman Ian Foster to stop filming. The guard threatened to take away the camera and expel the film crew from the conference if they did not obey his instructions to stop filming Professor Schneider.

His microphone was cut off after he asked former vice-president Al Gore about the British court case which found that An Inconvenient Truth had a nine significant errors and exaggerations. Almost 500,000 people have watched the incident on youtube.

Fri pins

Its Friday again

SNL's obligatory Tiger Woods skit

Al Gore provides jourrrrnalists with "facts"

Andrew Bolt at the Herald Sun exposes the jackass, Al Gore:

Al Gore has studied the Climategate emails with his typically rigorous eye and dismissed them as mere piffle:

Q: How damaging to your argument was the disclosure of e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University?

A: To paraphrase Shakespeare, it’s sound and fury signifying nothing. I haven’t read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. These private exchanges between these scientists do not in any way cause any question about the scientific consensus.

And in case you think that was a mere slip of the tongue:

Q: There is a sense in these e-mails, though, that data was hidden and hoarded, which is the opposite of the case you make [in your book] about having an open and fair debate.

A: I think it’s been taken wildly out of context. The discussion you’re referring to was about two papers that two of these scientists felt shouldn’t be accepted as part of the IPCC report. Both of them, in fact, were included, referenced, and discussed. So an e-mail exchange more than 10 years ago including somebody’s opinion that a particular study isn’t any good is one thing, but the fact that the study ended up being included and discussed anyway is a more powerful comment on what the result of the scientific process really is.

In fact, thrice denied:

These people are examining what they can or should do to deal with the P.R. dimensions of this, but where the scientific consensus is concerned, it’s completely unchanged. What we’re seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly.

In fact, as Watts Up With That shows, one Climategate email was from just two months ago. The most recent was sent on November 12 - just a month ago. The emails which have Tom Wigley seeming (to me) to choke on the deceit are all from this year. Phil Jones’ infamous email urging other Climategate scientists to delete emails is from last year.

How closely did Gore read these emails? Did he actually read any at all? Was he lying or just terribly mistaken? What else has he got wrong? More here:

Will any "Jourrrrnalist" ask Gore about his idiocy ? If so, will the media show you the results? This is one of the things I love about liberals. They're impervious to humiliation.

Sheep are shorn

Nearly $6 million in stimulus money was paid to two firms run by Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton’s pollster in 2008.

Federal records show that $5.97 million from the $787 billion stimulus helped preserve three jobs at Burson-Marsteller, the global public-relations and communications firm headed by Penn. More here:

Ha ha - they steal your money and give it to their buddies. LMAO. Keep voting for libs.

Lt Col Allen WEST

What Hollywood actors think of the public

Thanks to Wombat, who brought this clip to my attention.

Death Penalty

The death penalty is described by some as cruel and unusual punishment. Cruel, should be used only when describing how the victims died as a result of the
condemned man or woman's conduct.
Unusual, should be used to describe the number of death penalties given in that it does not seem to be usually administered.

Ohio executed Kenneth BIROS, today for the murder of a 22 year old woman. He disposed of the body throughout Ohio and Penna. He was convicted in 1991, and during that time his attorney fought the execution on the grounds that the use of three needles needed to conduct the execution was cruel and unusual in that it caused pain, (or what ever) and that only one needle should be used.

I will include some excerpts from the article. While reading the article I did not find to much about the cruel and unusual suffering that I am sure the young woman endured from the (now dead) piece of shit.

CBS NEWS article
The state "could and should shift to a one-drug protocol designed to cause death by means of an overdose of an anesthetic," John Parker, one of Biros' attorneys, said in a court filing last year.

Biros' attorneys want his execution delayed, saying the new untested method has never been used in "any other civilized country" and would amount to human experimentation. But the same attorneys earlier advocated for the state to switch to the one-drug method.

All 36 death penalty states use lethal injection, and 35 rely on the three-drug method. Nebraska, which recently adopted injection over electrocution, has proposed the three-drug method but hasn't finalized the process.

(not from CBS news, from me)
I think it was cruel and usual punishment to the woman's family to let this piece of shit live for 19 more years.

Ha ha - ABANDON CLIMATE SHIP

The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.

The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.

The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.

The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".

A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:

• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;

• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";

• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;

• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.

They also have some quotes from attendees from the "poorer nations." The rest here:

Oh Lordy. "Nopenhagen." You mean the UN won't get its hands on the curp? You mean the poorer nations aren't going to get a windfall of cash? If this stays in effect, they'll be jumping off the bandwagon faster than crack addict on welfare who was told he has to get a job.

Hey, I wonder if they still think "the debate is over."

More media brainwashing

Found this entry at Ace of Spades blog - Dec 8:

Ace reminds us that the media brainwashes helps you differentiate between views on climate change. If you agree with the libs, you're an "expert" ... if not, you're a "skeptic" ... or a "denier" etc, Isn't that funny? There are no "experts" who disagree with their views. He's talking about the newspaper headline below.

Headline: the eternal struggle between skeptics and people you should listen to, experts.

In Face of Skeptics, Experts Affirm Climate Peril

This is one of the oldest, cheapest media tricks there is, and one such that, if they were truly unbiased, they would simply change their stylebook to forbid evermore.

We've seen this trick a million times. Sketching the battle-lines in a debate, the liberal media will call the advocates from, say, the Brookings Institute experts or note their subject-matter of expertise -- economic forecasters, for example -- and their critics at Heritage conservatives.

Get that? You can either go with this presumably-apolitical unbiased expertise in the field being discussed, or you can go with this conservative.

All the time. All. The. Time.

Nevermind that the Brookings Institute guy's credentials might only be a JD and ten years of political advocacy. He's an "expert" by simple dint of his political persuasion. And nevermind the critic from AEI or Heritage might be a Ph.D. in economics (or whatever subject matter is under discussion), he's the "conservative" politico with an axe to grind but no understanding of the subject at all.

Screw "Climategate," we're full speed ahead

Ha ha, if congress can't get at you right now, no biggie, the EPA will handle their light work.

Below are excerpts from this article:

An "endangerment" finding by the Environmental Protection Agency could pave the way for the government to require businesses that emit carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions -- even if Congress doesn't pass pending climate-change legislation. EPA action to regulate emissions could affect the U.S. economy more directly, and more quickly, than any global deal inked in the Danish capital, where no binding agreement is expected.

An EPA endangerment finding "could result in a top-down command-and-control regime that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every major construction and renovation project," U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said in a statement.

EPA action won't do much to combat climate change, and "is certain to come at a huge cost to the economy," said the National Association of Manufacturers, a trade group that stands as a proxy for U.S. industry.

Electricity generation, transportation and industry represent the three largest sources of U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions.

An EPA spokeswoman declined to comment Sunday on when the agency might finalize its proposed endangerment finding.

So, you didn't know the EPA had such power? Well ... now you do. And what will happink to your utility bills when they make their "finding?" Here is Obama, giving you the answer himself.

I just dumped Google as my search engine

You know how Google likes to commemorate different days/holidays etc with their logo? I've noticed they usually do so for lefty holidays (Earth day, etc) but they conspicuously disregard most patriotic days. For example, today is Dec 7th (Pearl Harbor Day.) Google had nothing.

Bing had the pic below:

So I switched my homepage from Google to Bing. So far I like it just as well as Google but we shall see. If it turns out I like them equally, I shall stay with Bing. From my perspective, Bing is about as lefty as Google ... but MAYBE slightly less so. Google pulls too much bullshit. They were even hiding certain results about Climategate for a while.

Here are the instructions for changing your homepage:

-- Firefox

-- Internet Explorer

"Good news is that I truly out did myself this year with my Christmas decorations. The bad news is that I had to take him down after 2 days. I had more people come screaming up to my house than ever.Great stories. But two things made me take it down.

First, the cops advised me that it would cause traffic accidents as they almost wrecked when they drove by.

Second, a 55 year old lady grabbed the 75 pound ladder almost killed herself putting it against my house and didn't realize it was fake until she climbed to the top (she was not happy). By the way, she was one of many people who attempted to do that. My yard couldn't take it either. I have more than a few tire tracks where people literally drove up my yard."


received from a friend in e-mail