Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Global Warming Leeches ... I mean, "Scientists," stuck in ice


Yes, it's all so funny, isn't it?

Global warming scientists forced to admit defeat... because of too much ice: Stranded Antarctic ship's crew will be rescued by helicopter

  • Chris Turney, a climate scientist and leader of the expedition, was going to document 'environmental changes' at the pole
  • In an interview he said he expected melting ice to play a part in expedition
Yes, well ... hey, Dr Chris ... where are you getting the money for this "expedition?"  Let me guess, right out of my wallet, right, asshole?

What I want to know is, since when is "funding bullshit science" on the list of enumerated powers in the constitution?  Is this a sign of "limited government?"  Or is it more likely a sign of "unlimited government?"

I love it, they just take millions and squander it so Little Bo Sheep can commune with a gd penguin.

More here:

And then some genius-lib commenter posts:

"It is called CLIMATE CHANGE and it means Colder Winters and Hotter Summers and therefore more extremes just like this. Want proof this is it!"

Right ... because everything is "PROOF" with these people.  And why are they so interested in "proving" anything?  Answer: So they can separate you from your cash.  That's the ONLY reason.

Warming?  PROOF!
Cooling?  PROOF!
Lots of storms?  PROOF!
Fewer storms?  PROOF!
Ice melting?  PROOF!
Too much ice?  PROOF!

Think about it ... if they couldn't use the government to separate you from your money, then why would they care what you think?  But they have to care ... they have to have enough people to vote in their favor, otherwise, they might have to get jobs.

Meanwhile, remember when it was "Global Cooling" in the 70's?  Remember when they had to admit they are wrong?  Yes, and  that was after spending years and years "PROVING" it every two minutes?

Do you think that those kind of people might be hesitant to get involved in another fiasco so soon after a what must have been a humiliating experience?  Normal people wouldn't ... but libs aren't "normal people."  Libs are incable of being embarrassed.  Think about it ... it they were subject to embarrassment, they'd couldn't be liberals ... it would be too embarrassing.

Anyway, the answer is "no" -- libs didn't hesitate an instant to glom onto "Global Warming."  Why?  Because it separates you from your cash.  It gives them all the money they need to continue to "PROVE" they are needed.  Meanwhile, we need them like a hole in the head.

And how do they say we should solve "Global Warming?"   Answer: Stop using fossil fuels.
But wasn't this their answer to global cooling back in the 70's?  Answer: Yes

As I pointed out above, it's lucky for libs they are immune to humiliation..

Wouldn't it be nice to let libs live and do as they please?  Yes, it would ... but libs won't do that.  They can't live their lives without involving you ... and preferably for you to be telling them how smart and wonderful  they are all the time.  They CANNOT leave others alone.

The commenter I quoted above says "It is called ... blah blah."  Ever notice how much they use this phrase?  Ever notice how proud of themselves they are when they apply it.  I just love a lib telling me what something is "called."  Whatever would I do without their genius.

This is the old version of "It's not about ______, its about ________."  Libs, constantly lecturing, they canna stop themselves.  They'd all be gold medalists if "Leaping to the Podium" were an Olympic event.

1 comment:

A is A said...

So, what does this boat use for fuel? What do the two icebreakers dispatched to save them use for fuel? What do the helicopters that will finally rescue them use for fuel? What would they use as fuel to keep themselves warm if they had made it to their base camp? You know the answer.

Post a Comment