Democratics face crucial dilemma ... which to believe, the NYT or Pravda?

For years, the Elites of the West have cranked up the myth of Man Made Global Warming as a means first and foremost to control the lives and behaviors of their populations. Knowing full well that their produce in China and sell in the West model and its consequent spiral downward in wages and thus standards of living, was unsustainable, the elites moved to use this new "science" to guilt trip and scare monger their populations into smaller and more conservatives forms of living.

 What better way to staunch protests at worsening economic and life conditions than to make it feel like an honourable job/duty of the people to save "Gia". Gia worship, the earth "mother", has been pushed in popular culture oozing out of the West for a better part of the past 1.5 decades. This is a religion replete with an army of priests, called Government Grant Scientists.

 The US alone spends $7 billion each year on warming "studies", which is, in truth, nothing but a huge money laundering operation, as no real science is conducted and vapid alarmist reports the only product generated. More at Pravda:

"Spends $7 billion" = Gives $7 billion to their buddies in the "green" industry.

You gotta feel sorry for the communists Democratics, whom are they to believe?  The New York Times ... or Pravda.  Oh, the brain damage they'll be suffering.

Don't feel too sorry for them though, they'll come to the correct conclusion as soon as they figure out which one means more of their liberty, money, and power for the government.

And this is for those of you who don't like the way I spelled "dilemma" in the title.