The great global warming collapse

Remember all the gullible libs idiots who took pics like this as proof of global warming?  They were all fakes /hoaxes... read more if you don't believe me.  Once they were proven to be hoaxes, remember how the media jumped ALL OVER IT and exposed the shysters?  No?  I don't either.

Excerpts from this article at theglobeandmail: (Bold is mine)

And now, the science scandals just keep on coming. First there was the vast cache of e-mails leaked from the University of East Anglia, home of a crucial research unit responsible for collecting temperature data. Although not fatal to the science, they revealed a snakepit of scheming to keep contradictory research from being published, make imperfect data look better, and withhold information from unfriendly third parties. If science is supposed to be open and transparent, these guys acted as if they had a lot to hide.

Despite widespread efforts to play down the Climategate e-mails, they were very damaging. An investigation by the British newspaper The Guardian – among the most aggressive advocates for action on climate change – has found that a series of measurements from Chinese weather stations were seriously flawed, and that documents relating to them could not be produced.

Meantime, the IPCC – the body widely regarded, until now, as the ultimate authority on climate science – is looking worse and worse. After it was forced to retract its claim about melting glaciers, Mr. Pachauri dismissed the error as a one-off. But other IPCC claims have turned out to be just as groundless.

For example, it warned that large tracts of the Amazon rain forest might be wiped out by global warming because they are extremely susceptible to even modest decreases in rainfall. The sole source for that claim, reports The Sunday Times of London, was a magazine article written by a pair of climate activists, one of whom worked for the WWF. One scientist contacted by the Times, a specialist in tropical forest ecology, called the article “a mess.”

Worse still, the Times has discovered that Mr. Pachauri's own Energy and Resources Unit, based in New Delhi, has collected millions in grants to study the effects of glacial melting – all on the strength of that bogus glacier claim, which happens to have been endorsed by the same scientist who now runs the unit that got the money. Even so, the IPCC chief is hanging tough. He insists the attacks on him are being orchestrated by companies facing lower profits. More here:

Ok, now what would an honest politician do with these facts? Let's say I'm a politician that used to support the global warming agenda. I think right about now I'd be coming out saying "wait a minute ... some HUGE problems have appeared ... I'm going to reexamine my position on this ... it appears we may have wasted untold BILLIONS of dollars."

Instead, what do you think will happen. Let me tell you what will happen ... I saw it in the 70's. They'll all stand around with big-toe-in-the-sand for a while and nobody will say SHIT. The media will allow the whole thing to quietly vanish and in another 20 years or so, they'll try it again ... only THIS TIME ... the science will really REALLY be settled. No ... REALLY!! PLEASE LET US TAX THE EVER-LOVING-SHIT OUT OF YOU ... PLEEEEEEASE!!!

Hey, have you heard anything about the polar ice caps melting lately? Remember when they were all certain that soon the poles would be without ice?  THEY WERE WRONG!  Has anyone stepped up to the plate and admitted it?  Anyone taking responsibility?  *Looking around*  "Anyone?  Anyone?  No?  Shocker.  I think it would take a real shitstain not to admit they were wrong, don't you?