By Janet Hook, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
December 24, 2007
Does she say "Tax reform?"
Does she say "Campaigning to get rid of income tax?"
Does she try to be fair? -- Or does she try to mislead?
Ohhhh -- The LA Times -- I get it.
Gee -- I wonder how their financial picture looks.
This from Newsbusters:
Frantic for Revenue,
LA Times Plans to Place Ads On Front Page
By Dave Pierre July 16, 2007 - 07:25 ET
Revenue is down big time at the Los Angeles Times, and desperate times call for desperate measures. Here you go:
Amid a steep decline in revenue, the Los Angeles Times is planning to break with long-standing tradition by selling ads on its front page, Publisher David Hiller said Friday (7/13/07).
When it happens, the newspaper will be the largest metropolitan paper in the country to place ads there.
I absolutely love Patterico's response to the news:
The paper already runs ads for Democrats on the front page. They might as well get paid for it.
Bingo! Absolutely right on. (We've reported about the Times' front-page, hot-n-heavy love for the Democrats here, here, here, here, here, here, and here, for example.)
Amid a steep decline in revenue, the Los Angeles Times is planning to break with long-standing tradition by selling ads on its front page, Publisher David Hiller said Friday (7/13/07).
When it happens, the newspaper will be the largest metropolitan paper in the country to place ads there.
I absolutely love Patterico's response to the news:
The paper already runs ads for Democrats on the front page. They might as well get paid for it.
Bingo! Absolutely right on. (We've reported about the Times' front-page, hot-n-heavy love for the Democrats here, here, here, here, here, here, and here, for example.)
2nd Q: "Cash flow down a whopping 27%, making it one of the worst quarters ever experienced."
Hey, Janet - you dumbass, liberal snatch - "SOME SAY" you suck.
GO BROKE YOU ROTTEN, CHEATING, ASSHOLES.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment