From Newsbusters:
Yes -- Fair and objective CNN ensures that liberals get planted in the audience for the Democrap debates -- and then, to maintain fairness, ensures that liberals are planted in the Republican debate also.
I don't know about you but I never get tired of having liberal concerns and points-of-view crammed right up my ass.
Yes -- Fair and objective CNN ensures that liberals get planted in the audience for the Democrap debates -- and then, to maintain fairness, ensures that liberals are planted in the Republican debate also.
I don't know about you but I never get tired of having liberal concerns and points-of-view crammed right up my ass.
In the greatest of ironies, (the ironing was delicious) after Democrats refused to participate in debates sponsored by Fox News due to its supposed partiality, CNN has now shown itself in back-to-back debates to be as biased as biased can be.
After either participating in or allowing the planting of campaign operatives at November 15's Democrat presidential debate in Las Vegas, it has now become apparent that similar stocking of audience questioners occurred in Wednesday's Republican debate.
As NewsBuster Matthew Balan reported Wednesday, "a member of Hillary Clinton's "LGBT Americans For Hillary Steering Committee" not only asked a question via YouTube, "but he was also present in the audience, and got to ask the candidates for a ‘straight answer.'"
On Thursday morning, Michelle Malkin identified two plants from the Obama and Edwards campaigns. As her website is having some problems at the moment, Inside Cable News reported that according to Malkin, one plant was David Cercone, a declared Obama supporter, who asked the following question: More here:
As such, it hasn't even been 24 hours since this debate concluded, and three plants - all with connections to Democrat candidates - have been identified.
Regardless of whether or not CNN is specifically involved, as this is now the second consecutive incident of such behavior at a debate sponsored by this network, has it now abused the public trust enough to not be allowed to sponsor any more debates in this election cycle?
Regardless of whether or not CNN is specifically involved, as this is now the second consecutive incident of such behavior at a debate sponsored by this network, has it now abused the public trust enough to not be allowed to sponsor any more debates in this election cycle?
OK - that's a dumb question -- if strings of behavior such as "abusing the public's trust" was enough to punish "the news media," (CNN, CBS, NBC, PBS, and their ilk,) would have been abolished long ago.
Anyway -- Michelle found three -- I think I heard Rush say "five plants" -- and this morning it's up to eight a growing -- from different sources -- I guess "just a little" cheating wasn't enough.
And CNN is claiming they didn't know -- I guess they can't google too well. Also, CNN paid for this jackass's flight, hotel, etc so he could come to the debate -- did you know that?
2 comments:
I understand that Dan Rather is working on a CNN denial speech
Deflect faux news bias by pointing out CNNs...LMAO
Hey, I know virgins that give birth too!!!
Christian loser
Post a Comment