Here are Zogby's "FINAL" poll results before the 2004 election. Great job, jackass.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Obama readying Gestapo
Obama: We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
What will happen when The One pushes his Marxist agenda to the point that those of us who are still Americans balk? Will our armed forces fire on us on orders from this punk, in the interests of imposing the same ideology our military was intended to stave off?
... posse comitatus forbids the use of the military to enforce laws within the borders — and the sort of Change Obama has in mind will require a whole lot of enforcement.
We're talking about a "civilian national security force" with an annual budget of $439 billion. If you have anything negative to say about socialism or the global warming hoax, you'd better get it out of your system before this American version of the Gestapo is created, because it will certainly have the resources to discover your errant opinions and readjust them as The One and his friends deem necessary. Excerpts - the rest (with video) at Moonbattery
One to grow on
A cop was on his horse waiting to cross the street, when a little girl on her
new shiny bike stopped beside him.
'Nice bike,' the cop said. 'Did Santa bring it to you?'
'Yes Sir,' the little girl said, 'he sure did!'
The cop looked the bike over and handed the girl a $5 ticket for a safety
violation.
The cop said, 'Next year, tell Santa to put a reflector light on the back of
it!'
The young girl looked up at the cop and said, 'Nice horse you've got there Sir.
Did Santa bring it to you?'
Playing along with the girl, he chuckled and answered,
'Yes, he sure did!'
The little girl looked up at the cop and said, 'Next year tell Santa... The dick
goes underneath the horse, not on top.'
new shiny bike stopped beside him.
'Nice bike,' the cop said. 'Did Santa bring it to you?'
'Yes Sir,' the little girl said, 'he sure did!'
The cop looked the bike over and handed the girl a $5 ticket for a safety
violation.
The cop said, 'Next year, tell Santa to put a reflector light on the back of
it!'
The young girl looked up at the cop and said, 'Nice horse you've got there Sir.
Did Santa bring it to you?'
Playing along with the girl, he chuckled and answered,
'Yes, he sure did!'
The little girl looked up at the cop and said, 'Next year tell Santa... The dick
goes underneath the horse, not on top.'
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
Yes - he told you with his own mouth ... "... under my plan, electricity rates will necessarily skyrocket."
He plans to crush capitalism once and for all. How people can vote for this guy, I will never understand.
One might be hopeful that people will learn a lesson from the consequences of this looming disaster. Think again. When it happens, half of America will blame it on greedy corporations -- or ANYTHING except MASSIVE regulations and government interference in the free market -- i.e. communism.
I guess it's over
McCain has not led in any national poll since September, trailing in every single one of the more than 250 released in October.
Most national polls yesterday had Obama with a six- or seven-point lead over McCain.
Some national projections put Obama in line to easily win more than 300 electoral college votes, a comfortable cushion in a race in which 270 brings victory.
In three battleground states that allow early voting, Nevada, North Carolina and Florida, he has already banked large leads. Excerpts - the rest here:
Most national polls yesterday had Obama with a six- or seven-point lead over McCain.
Some national projections put Obama in line to easily win more than 300 electoral college votes, a comfortable cushion in a race in which 270 brings victory.
In three battleground states that allow early voting, Nevada, North Carolina and Florida, he has already banked large leads. Excerpts - the rest here:
Yes, ALL of the media and ALL of the polls say it's over, might as well pack it in ... voting would be a waste of your time ... get it? Stay home, relax, welcome your new capitalism-crushing overlords.
Communists begin shut down of critics
A Federal Communications Commission investigation of on-air military analysts is providing a glimpse of what Democrats and an Obama administration will do to critics once they capture Washington.
The FCC has sent letters to some of the nation's most prominent military analysts -- some of them pro-President Bush and pro-war -- suggesting they may have broken the law when they appeared on television stations to comment on and explain the war on terrorism.
The FCC investigation raises the question of whether a Democrat-controlled Congress and White House next year will investigate -- and perhaps criminalize -- all sorts of actions taken by the Bush administration. Obama is leading in all presidential polls, while Democrats are set to greatly increase their hold on the House and Senate.
The FCC letters came at the behest of two House Democrats, who say the analysts parroted on air the private briefings they received at the Pentagon. This may have broken the law, the lawmakers said.
The probe is sending chills through the ranks of military commentators, some of them decorated war heroes who share their expertise with millions of lay viewers. They see it as one in a series of moves the Left is making to intimidate and shut up its critics.
"We are seeing the dawn of a new era of the current Democratic leadership trying to muzzle free speech and the First Amendment," retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney, a Fox News analyst, told HUMAN EVENTS. "It may be the most invasive intrusion that we have seen in our history. There will be more of these tactics to follow."
"They're going to implement the Fairness Doctrine to basically do away with Right-wing radio," Vallely said. "In their minds, balance means Left wing. It's Socialists trying to infringe on our First Amendment rights."
Begun in 1949 as an FCC policy and then a regulation, the agency abolished the doctrine during the Ronald Reagan administration as an infringement on free speech. Democrats passed a bill to reinstate the policy as law, but Reagan vetoed it. There would be no Reagan to veto the next bill Democrats are likely to enact should Obama win the election. Excerpts - the rest here:
The FCC has sent letters to some of the nation's most prominent military analysts -- some of them pro-President Bush and pro-war -- suggesting they may have broken the law when they appeared on television stations to comment on and explain the war on terrorism.
The FCC investigation raises the question of whether a Democrat-controlled Congress and White House next year will investigate -- and perhaps criminalize -- all sorts of actions taken by the Bush administration. Obama is leading in all presidential polls, while Democrats are set to greatly increase their hold on the House and Senate.
The FCC letters came at the behest of two House Democrats, who say the analysts parroted on air the private briefings they received at the Pentagon. This may have broken the law, the lawmakers said.
The probe is sending chills through the ranks of military commentators, some of them decorated war heroes who share their expertise with millions of lay viewers. They see it as one in a series of moves the Left is making to intimidate and shut up its critics.
"We are seeing the dawn of a new era of the current Democratic leadership trying to muzzle free speech and the First Amendment," retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney, a Fox News analyst, told HUMAN EVENTS. "It may be the most invasive intrusion that we have seen in our history. There will be more of these tactics to follow."
"They're going to implement the Fairness Doctrine to basically do away with Right-wing radio," Vallely said. "In their minds, balance means Left wing. It's Socialists trying to infringe on our First Amendment rights."
Begun in 1949 as an FCC policy and then a regulation, the agency abolished the doctrine during the Ronald Reagan administration as an infringement on free speech. Democrats passed a bill to reinstate the policy as law, but Reagan vetoed it. There would be no Reagan to veto the next bill Democrats are likely to enact should Obama win the election. Excerpts - the rest here:
al Qaeda hates Republicans, loves Obama
DUBAI (Reuters) - An al Qaeda leader has called for President George W. Bush and the Republicans to be "humiliated," without endorsing any party in the upcoming U.S. presidential election, according to a video posted on the Internet.
"O God, humiliate Bush and his party, O Lord of the Worlds, degrade and defy him," Abu Yahya al-Libi said at the end of sermon marking the Muslim feast of Eid al-Fitr, in a video posted on the Internet. More here:
"O God, humiliate Bush and his party, O Lord of the Worlds, degrade and defy him," Abu Yahya al-Libi said at the end of sermon marking the Muslim feast of Eid al-Fitr, in a video posted on the Internet. More here:
Coming soon to America
AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.
The revelations emerge as US tech giants Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, and a coalition of human rights and other groups unveiled a code of conduct aimed at safeguarding online freedom of speech and privacy.
The government has declared it will not let internet users opt out of the proposed national internet filter. More here:
The revelations emerge as US tech giants Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, and a coalition of human rights and other groups unveiled a code of conduct aimed at safeguarding online freedom of speech and privacy.
The government has declared it will not let internet users opt out of the proposed national internet filter. More here:
This will end up as ALL government interference does - with ridiculous rules and regulations that nobody can understand and peeps will start going to prison.
I love how they use the opposite terms for describing it too: "safeguarding online freedom of speech ... " You know, like "The FAIRNESS doctrine" -- or "DEMOCRATIC."
All over the world, people are LOSING their freedom. You think this won't happen in America?
When did socialism start in Amercia ?
Bill Woodrow Wilson was elected President as a Democrat in 1912.He proved highly successful in leading a Democratic Congress to pass major legislation that included the Federal Trade Commission, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Underwood Tariff, the Federal Farm Loan Act and most notably the Federal Reserve System.
"On the home front, he began the first effective draft in 1917, raised billions in war funding through Liberty Bonds, imposed an income tax, enacted the first federal drug prohibition, set up the War Industries Board, promoted labor union growth, supervised agriculture and food production through the Lever Act, took over control of the railroads, ..." More here:
"On the home front, he began the first effective draft in 1917, raised billions in war funding through Liberty Bonds, imposed an income tax, enacted the first federal drug prohibition, set up the War Industries Board, promoted labor union growth, supervised agriculture and food production through the Lever Act, took over control of the railroads, ..." More here:
Way to go, jackass.
More lib media bloodbaths
NEW YORK (AP) - The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J., will reduce its newsroom staff by nearly half through voluntary buyouts as New Jersey's largest newspaper seeks to return to profitability.
Jim Willse, the Star-Ledger's editor, said Friday that the newspaper accepted 151 buyout offers from its news staff, or about 45 percent of its 334 editorial employees. He said 17 buyout applications were rejected.
Some staffers already have left, and others are leaving by year's end, many after the elections. More here:
Jim Willse, the Star-Ledger's editor, said Friday that the newspaper accepted 151 buyout offers from its news staff, or about 45 percent of its 334 editorial employees. He said 17 buyout applications were rejected.
Some staffers already have left, and others are leaving by year's end, many after the elections. More here:
See ya later, idiots.
It's funny, isn't it? These liberal jackasses (most jourrrrrnalists) have been braying for almost a half century. They've been pushing this liberal agenda and brainwashing the American public. They got what they wanted -- MASSIVE government influence in the economy and a ridiculous growth in government bureaucracies. And now it's come home to haunt them. Who could have predicted this?
I'm just so happy to see them (liberal newspapers and other media) getting their asses whipped and losing their jobs and businesses. Another funny thing? They'll blame everything except themselves.
Of course, they brought us all down with them and that's why I have such hatred for them.
CNN - "News you can trust"
Take a look at this exchange between Sarah Palin and CNN's Drew Griffin:
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, CNN)
DREW GRIFFIN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Governor, you've been mocked in the press, the press has been pretty hard on you, the Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also, some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, "I can't tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt or all of the above."
GOV. SARAH PALIN, VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Who wrote that one?
GRIFFIN: That was in The National Review, I don't have the author.
PALIN: Who wrote it? I'd like to talk to that person.
GRIFFIN: But they were...
(END VIDEO CLIP)
Now, Griffin makes it sound like the National Review actually called Palin those names, but take a closer look at the context of what National Review columnist Byron York really wrote in his article.
• Video: Watch Heather Nauert's interview
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, CNN)
DREW GRIFFIN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Governor, you've been mocked in the press, the press has been pretty hard on you, the Democrats have been pretty hard on you, but also, some conservatives have been pretty hard on you as well. The National Review had a story saying that, you know, "I can't tell if Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt or all of the above."
GOV. SARAH PALIN, VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Who wrote that one?
GRIFFIN: That was in The National Review, I don't have the author.
PALIN: Who wrote it? I'd like to talk to that person.
GRIFFIN: But they were...
(END VIDEO CLIP)
Now, Griffin makes it sound like the National Review actually called Palin those names, but take a closer look at the context of what National Review columnist Byron York really wrote in his article.
• Video: Watch Heather Nauert's interview
He said, quote, "Watching the press coverage of the Republican candidate for vice president, it's sometimes hard to decide whether Sarah Palin is incompetent, stupid, unqualified, corrupt, backward, or — well, all of the above. " More here:
In other words, he meant the media is trying very hard to represent her as all those negative things. He was hammering the media, not Sarah Palin.
Way to go, CNN. Isn't your slogan "News you can trust?" Yes, we trust that your news is biased as hell and you think the American people are complete idiots.
The part that really cracks me up is now he's trying to backpedal. He's saying he was going to explain the position of the National Review author but that Sarah cut him off. Sure, the American idiots will buy that.
He's lying his ass off and here's why. He said " ... some conservatives have been hard on you as well" and then goes on to use the National Review article MISQUOTE as an example of that. What he was actually TRYING to show (idiots) is that liberals AND conservatives are against her. What a jackass.
They probably don't miss their freedom
North Korea is clamping down on mobile phones and long distance telephone calls to prevent the spread of news about a worsening food crisis, according to the United Nations investigator on human rights for the isolated communist country.
In a report to the UN General Assembly, Vitit Muntarbhorn, a Thai law professor who has never been allowed to visit North Korea, said that its government is using public executions as a means of intimidating the population, and using spies to infiltrate and expose religious communities. More here:
In a report to the UN General Assembly, Vitit Muntarbhorn, a Thai law professor who has never been allowed to visit North Korea, said that its government is using public executions as a means of intimidating the population, and using spies to infiltrate and expose religious communities. More here:
He probably HAD to clamp down on them -- for their own good, of course.
Why? Because this is what leftists/communists do. No dissent is allowed. Soon the lefties in America will "clamp down" on talk radio. Because that is what leftists do. It's for the good of the people, of course.
More cheating - rules mean nothing
Not a Bombshell: Barack Obama's Campaign Website Encourages Fraudulent Donations
—Ace
John Galt of Ayn Rand Lane (zip code: a nonexistent 99999) was able to donate with no problem.
Despite the fact that the card holder's name and address do not match the name he provided.
John McCain's website? Rejected the same non-matching-information donation.
—Ace
John Galt of Ayn Rand Lane (zip code: a nonexistent 99999) was able to donate with no problem.
Despite the fact that the card holder's name and address do not match the name he provided.
John McCain's website? Rejected the same non-matching-information donation.
More at Ace's blog:
LOL @ "John Galt at Ayn Rand lane."
Who in the hell is John Galt?
SNL players crack each other up
This skit isn't that funny but it always amuses me when comedians can't keep a straight face.
Found it at Bojo's blog:
Found it at Bojo's blog:
San Francisco peeps celebrate "tolerance"
Radio host - "I want #%$** Joe the Plumber dead."
Oh, did I mention that he's a contributing writer for the lefty blog Huffington Post?
Gotta love the Dipshitocrats
At an event at a Boca Raton synagogue, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) said that the United States should let Russia invade Georgia. Beginning at the 3:50 mark in the following YouTube video, which was recorded by Pamela Geller of the blog Atlas Shrugs, Nadler says:
We have not been willing to put our priorities properly. We have not been willing to say ... "Hey Russia, we won't expand NATO into the Ukraine and Georgia, right next to your borders, if you cooperate with us on Iran." ...
I think Iran and Israel are a hell of a lot more important than expanding NATO to Russia's borders. Why should we? What do we need it for?
Someone in the crowd says: "Because they invaded Georgia."
Nadler retorts: "So let 'em invade Georgia. It's right next to them. Would we tolerate a foreign--a Russian army in Mexico? Which is more important to us Georgia or Israel, frankly?"
We have not been willing to put our priorities properly. We have not been willing to say ... "Hey Russia, we won't expand NATO into the Ukraine and Georgia, right next to your borders, if you cooperate with us on Iran." ...
I think Iran and Israel are a hell of a lot more important than expanding NATO to Russia's borders. Why should we? What do we need it for?
Someone in the crowd says: "Because they invaded Georgia."
Nadler retorts: "So let 'em invade Georgia. It's right next to them. Would we tolerate a foreign--a Russian army in Mexico? Which is more important to us Georgia or Israel, frankly?"
More at the Weekly Standard:
Sunday, November 2, 2008
I think somebody's ass is in trouble
Shocker: Worker Ordered to Run Illegal Check on Joe the Plumber Says There's No Such Thing as a "Thrust into the Spotlight" Check, That She Was Lied to About Reason for Check, and She Was Instructed to Lie About the Reason for Check Afterwards
—Ace
—Ace
The rest at Ace's blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
