Democrat Barack Obama mocked John McCain on Wednesday for urging government restraint in responding to the mortgage crisis, saying the
Republican would "just sit back and watch" as millions of Americans lost their homes.
"We've been down this road before," Obama said. "It's the road George Bush has taken . . . for the last eight years. It's the idea that government has no role at all in solving the challenges facing working families -- that all we can do is hand out tax breaks for the wealthiest few and let the chips fall where they may."
Gaaaa - tax breaks for the evil rich.
McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds dismissed Obama's comments as "old attack and smear tactics."
"John McCain has called for an immediate and balanced approach to provide transparency and accountability in an effort to help homeowners who are hurting, while Barack Obama has made a $10-billion election-year promise that is sure to raise taxes and handcuff an already struggling economy," Bounds said.
In a Santa Ana speech Tuesday, McCain said that he was open to ideas on weathering the crisis, but that
government should not reward banks or small borrowers that had acted irresponsibly. More
here:
Yes -- after all -- people aren't capable of reading their own contracts -- you know -- since liberals have blocked discipline in classrooms for 2 generations. Now it's a huge surprise when these illiterates are "ripped off" by "predatory lending" practices.
After all -- why should people have to pay attention in school? What benefit do they derive from it ... the ability to earn a living and avoid "rip offs?" Why should they work and study hard ... hell ... if I make a huge mistake, the Klown will gladly pay ... he doesn't mind ... just ask Obama and the libs.
But Klown -- Obama is only going to "tax the rich."
Sure he is -- and the rich will never raise my prices to make up the difference -- right? Let me tell you -- if you ever sit in on a corporate board meeting, you will see -- if expenses (taxes) go up, the corporation MUST raise their prices or cut expenses. If they do not, their profits will decrease -- if their profit decreases the stockholders will start to fire the executives. So -- you end up paying the higher tax FOR THEM ... CAPISCE?
Meanwhile, that McCain, boy -- he sure is a cruel Republican. He's going to let the idiots suffer the pain for their own actions. And when I say "idiots," -- I mean ALL the idiots -- borrowers and lenders.
And then there's this at the bottom of the article:
Obama leads Clinton in delegates won in primaries and caucuses -- 1,621 to 1,499 -- according to the AP. But it is virtually impossible for either candidate to win enough delegates to capture the nomination, so more than 700 superdelegates will decide the race.
Spokesman Brendan Daly said Pelosi believed "it would do great harm to the Democratic Party if superdelegates are perceived to overturn the will of the voters. This has been her position throughout this primary season, regardless of who was ahead at any particular point in delegates or votes."
Ok -- I have to ask a question of this idiot lib. Hey -- idiot lib -- if the superdelegates are supposed to vote exactly the same as the regular voters -- then why have superdelegates? Answer that, shitforbrains.