Thursday, March 3, 2011

Oh joy, our colleges have produced another genius

Yes, after listening to this college guy, I've really changed my mind.  He's convinced me.  He's a "Democratic" one of our intellectual betters.

I've noticed something. These "geniuses" all have one thing in common ... they all want me to do as they say (and they're willing to force me if necessary) and, they all want me to give them my private property (money.) That's the bottom line with all of them. They all have all kinds of arguments and "science-tific facts" but they all end up in the same place ... "Do as we say and give us your money."

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Pointing and hollering "WITCH!!!"

So as you know, I often refer to "pointing and hollering 'witch'" to illustrate some point or another. Many years ago, I saw SNL do skits about witches and when the prosecutor, Jim Belushi, presented the evidence against the witch, it struck me that people who are easily led are subject to regarding "evidence" such as this as fact.

Libs are always using this technique and it is always successful (on other libs.) Think about it ... why on Earth would you use this technique unless you actually thought it was productive. If you had a clue about how you really looked, you'd avoid it like the plague.

Anyway, the specific part to which I refer is in this video ... starting at the 2-minute mark and going for about 30 seconds. So, from now on, when I say "pointing and hollering 'witch'" you'll know what's in my mind.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

What's this? The communists "restricting" freedom?


BEIJING (AP) - China appears to be rolling back some press freedoms, barring foreign journalists from working near a popular Shanghai park and along a major Beijing shopping street after calls for weekly protests in those spots appeared online.

I have news for you ... a "freedom" isn't a "freedom" if it can be "rolled back" by any individual or group.  It is only a privilege they ALLOW and revoke at their whim.

The new restrictions put the popular leisure spots on a par with Tibet as out-of-bounds areas where foreign reporters need special permission to work, and come after journalists were attacked and harassed while working in the areas over the weekend.

Bob Dietz, the Asia coordinator for the Committee to Protect Journalists, said the treatment of journalists in Beijing on Sunday was "the worst aggression against the foreign press we've seen since the Olympics in 2008."

"Such a heavy-handed response discredits the ruling Chinese Communist Party and highlights their fear of popular opposition," Dietz said in a statement. More here:

Ha ha, that's a good one.  He says it "discredits" the communist party ... as if the communist party ever had any "credit."  Hey, relax, asshat.  The government is only doing this to be "fair."  And isn't it always best for the government to decide what is fair and what is unfair?  Yes, they should make up a doctrine to control the media ... they could call it "The Fairness Doctrine" or "Localization" ... you know ... just catch up with the Democratics in the United States.

Monday, February 28, 2011

British prime Minister, David Cameron

Britain will work allies on plans to enforce a no-fly zone in Libya to protect its people from military attacks by Muammar Gaddafi's government, David Cameron has told the House of Commons.

The Prime Minister repeated his earlier call for Col Gaddafi to step down and said that all measures would be considered to increase pressure on him to go.

"We do not in any way rule out the use of military assets," Mr Cameron said. More here:

I like it when people say "military assets." That way you can see how smart they are.  If he had just said "We will not rule out military force" everyone would think he was a dumbass.

Oh oh, this is a bad infestation

Hmmmmm

The Klown hopes Farrakhan is right ... for once.


Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan predicted on Sunday that America faces imminent uprisings that mirror those in the Middle East.

“What you are looking at in Tunisia, in Egypt … Libya, in Bahrain … what you see happening there … you’d better prepare because it will be coming to your door,” Farrakhan said in a booming voice, thousands of followers cheering in his wake.

Farrakhan also called on President Barack Obama to allow protesters to march, urging the president not to attack innocent people when they do. More here:

Yes, Farrakhan is a racist anti-Semite ... but I hope he's right ... this time.   If the Republicans don't do something to reverse the idiocy that has become the US government then, yes, we'll be needing an "uprising."

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Slightly intoxicated




Ok he is shit faced

Friday, February 25, 2011

For the cat lovers

Poor wittow babies

Yes, when liberals are voting to take your money, you're supposed to shut up about it ... after all, it's "Democratic" ... it's for the greater good. However, when THEY have to pay a little bit for their own health care and retirement, they throw hissy fits.  Never mind they've broken the state. What a bunch of jackasses.

Also, notice the difference in apparel.

Pure genius

Here's a guerrilla marketing technique that goes far beyond KFC's advertising of the Double Down on the butts of college co-eds. A clothing store in New Zealand is using plates installed on benches to imprint their ad onto the back of bare legs. More here:

The ad agency behind the campaign explains:
We put indented plates on bus stop, mall, and park benches, so that when people sat down, the message was imprinted on their thighs. This meant that as well as having branded seats, a veritable army of free media was created, with thousands of imprints being created and lasting up to an hour.
Found it over at J-Walk's blog.

Great... what could possibly go wrong?

Robots might one day trace the origin of their consciousness to recent experiments aimed at instilling them with the ability to reflect on their own thinking.

Although granting machines self-awareness might seem more like the stuff of science fiction than science, there are solid practical reasons for doing so, explains roboticist Hod Lipson at Cornell University's Computational Synthesis Laboratory.

"The greatest challenge for robots today is figuring out how to adapt to new situations," he says. "There are millions of robots out there, mostly in factories, and if everything is in the right place at the right time for them, they are superhuman in their precision, in their power, in their speed, in their ability to work repetitively 24/7 in hazardous environments—but if a bolt falls out of place, game over."
Riiiight... it's MUCH better to have robots who are "already superhuman" with the ability to continue functioning even if something goes wrong. What could possibly go wrong?

Full article here.

Get your God-Damned Motherfucking Feet Off the Fucking Desk!



I know it's an old pic, but I'm not speaking literally.

fri pins


Thursday, February 24, 2011

Hey look -- a science-tific study


Australian researchers are challenging guidelines that urge diabetics to cut back on salt in their diet.

In a study that seems to turn conventional wisdom on its head, they found patients with the highest levels of sodium in their urine had the smallest risk of dying over a 10-year period.

"Such data call into question universal recommendations that all adults should endeavor to reduce their salt intake," Dr. Elif I. Ekinci of the University of Melbourne in Victoria and colleagues write in the journal Diabetes Care. More here:

Heh.  Coffee bad, coffee good.  Eggs bad, eggs good. Milk bad, milk good. It's all very "science-tific."  Just like global cooling ... erm, I mean global warming.  I have such respect for "scientists," don't you?  They're so ... well ... so smart.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Connecticut Legislature At Work



Snopes.com report.

According to one description I read, the screen behind Rep. Hennessy is showing baseball scores, and one of the screens in the row ahead is on Facebook.

Moronic Media Matters claims Wisconsin protests and Tea Party protests are the same thing

Moronic Media Matters claims Wisconsin protests and Tea Party protests are the same thing: "

In what amounts to an amazing display of left wing lunacy even by Media Matters standards, the Soros-backed scandal sheet has attacked Fox News yet again.

What has the evil Fox done now? According to Media Matters, “Fox News’ coverage of the Wisconsin protests over Gov. Scott Walker’s proposal to eliminate public employees’ collective bargaining rights, among other things, has been marked with repeated attacks on the protesters. However, by contrast, Fox has relentlessly promoted and even encouraged viewers to participate in tea party and “Tax Day” protests over the past few years.”

As much as we hate to admit it, Media Matters may have a point. The two events are exactly alike if you overlook the fact that the Tea Party was a grassroots movement that was entirely lawful, while the strike in Wisconsin is an illegal strike by teachers, or the fact that “doctors” wrote phony sick notes for the Wisconsin teachers which were not really necessary for the Tea Party members as once again THEY WERE NOT ACTING ILLEGALLY!

The liberal left, who consider themselves to be intellectual giants, seems to have a hard time with the word “illegal” as in “illegal strike” or “illegal immigrant.”

Speaking of hypocrisy however, why doesn’t Media Matters show some of the signs from Wisconsin portraying the Governor as Hitler and showing him in crosshairs? Wasn’t that the same “violent rhetoric” that the left was condemning mere weeks ago?

On second thought, Media Matters doesn’t have a point after all.

madison-sign-3

madison-sign-1

madison-sign-2

madison-sign-4

madison-sing-5

madison-sign-7

Source: MediaMatters

"

Remarkable, right? Liberals do not hesitate to compare their enemies to Hitler. Of course, expect nothing but disgust and disdain if you dare to compare their comrades to Hitler.

They get outraged when "Republicans redefine rape" (I'd share the link to moveon.org but "mysteriously", they don't have a search function on their homepage. Weird, right? I wonder why they'd do that. (As an aside, I got a chuckle out of their "Chip in $_____" box. Those libs are always looking for a handout and are always willing to use some outdated, hokey expression for begging. I'm surprised they haven't pulled out the always-clever "brother can you spare a dime?" that they made so popular after their "American Hero" FDR initiated and then prolonged the Great Depression.)) but it's perfectly fine to have picket signs advertising "gang bangs". Without mentioning the fact that if you need to talk about it, you aren't doing it, these people might want to stop talking about the splinter in their brother's eye and start focusing on the log in theirs. Matthew 7:1-7:5.

The fashion industry is racist.

(Newser) – Watch almost any runway show in the US and Europe, and you'll find black models in extremely short supply. That's the dirty secret of fashion, say many critics. "The industry is racist. In Milan black girls never work. In Paris it's still the same," British model booker Annie Wilshaw tells the Guardian. "It's 2011 and that's quite disgusting." You "know straight away" when clients are "not talking about a black girl," she adds. "They say they want 'a girl with long hair, who looks like a fairy' or something. When they want a black girl, they will say 'looking for mixed-race girl, tribal-prints location, desert scene.'"

Some in the fashion world blame practicalities like lighting and makeup which are different for black models, and therefore more time consuming. Model choice is also "driven by what sells and, in general, white blond girls sell, that's the mindset," says the founder of a modeling agency. "In fact, black girls do sell but they're not given as many openings. It is safer to go with a white girl, and in a recession people are very conservative." But why blame fashion, some wonder. "How can you expect fashion not to be slightly racist when the world is still racist?" asks black model Leonie Anderson.
Of course, nobody discusses the fact that black women dress differently than white women. Nobody discusses the fact that the color of your skin (even among different shades of the same race) drastically affects how clothes look on you. No- the problem is racism. Plain and simple. The debate is settled. Racism is a real problem in America and you need our help with it.

If everyone would just face the fact that the fashion industry is built upon narcissism, vanity, and status, they'd stop paying attention to it at all. It's all about power and exerting power over others and I don't care how many "powerful black women" you put on the Maury Povich show,  the people who are willing to spend the most money on fashion aren't buying it.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Those Crazy Dems





So is he a "plushy" or a "furry"?


Story here.


FDR on public sector unions



As usual, it is necessary help idiot liberals with their amnesia.  Here's what their hero, Franklin Delano Roosevert had to say about public sector unions.
"... Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government. All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations ... The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for ... officials ... to bind the employer ... The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives ...

"Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of government employees. Upon employees in the federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people ... This obligation is paramount ... A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent ... to prevent or obstruct ... Government ... Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government ... is unthinkable and intolerable."
Yes, and finally, remember two things:
1 - Unions have various unfair legal advantages over corporations.
2 - When "regular" unions strike, they are striking for more money out of the company profits.  When public sector unions strike, they're striking for more of your tax money.

By the way, isn't it funny ... the libs keep coming up with all kinds of shit to justify stealing your money.
a) New deals, Fair deals, Square deals etc etc
b) War on poverty
c) Great society
d) Massive spending on education: Head start, school lunch, breakfast, dinner - even in summer.
e) I could go on and on but we'll stop here.

Meanwhile, ask yourself:
a) Is poverty gone? Are people working harder to stay out of poverty or are they satisfied taking your money for sitting on their asses having more children?
b) How are you liking all your "deals?"  You're paying out the ass for them, how do you like them?
c) Is society great yet?
d) What did we EVER do before the government started getting spending massive money on schools? THAT'S RIGHT ... before there were school lunches, people would die of starvation right in the middle of classes. But HEY, wait a minute ... look how much better our children are educated now ... you know ... with the pants hanging way down to showcase their intelligence. Yep, every where I look, I see great respect for teachers coming from these awesome students of today. I'm so proud.

Anyway, the point is that all these programs are failed. Not to worry though, they can be fixed ... THAT'S RIGHT ... everything can be made better ... all they need is more of your money.