Saturday, April 18, 2009

Another view of the Tea Parties..


Here’s the setup. It was Tax Day. Thousands of self-organized protesters had gathered around the nation to protest the irresponsible, incredibly rapid expansion of government under the current administration. The Democratic Party and the elite media had done everything in their power to first ignore, then discourage, ridicule, and belittle this grassroots movement. Theoretically respectable journalists were reduced to making double-entendre sexual jokes about tea bags. These are the same people who rushed en masse to cover Cindy Sheehan and a dozen or so antiwar protesters in Crawford, Texas, rechristening that sad, emotionally unpredictable woman with two of the most cherished words in the English language: Peace Mom. But what was their attitude when thousands of ordinary people gathered in defense of their rights all over the country? “Just move on, folks, nothing to see here.”

Ah well, they’re nervous, and I don’t blame them. Because despite their claims that the Tea Party movement is without ideas, it was the people at those protests who represented the beliefs of our Founding Fathers. And it’s the government and the press that have betrayed them.

Read the whole thing.

Found at where are my keys.

Even people who regularly visit this blog don't read it.

For Ragweed for the fact that his inability to acknowledge his stupidity imprisons him. Knee kick to Jules for being a toady (even if she doesn't know what that is).

Friday, April 17, 2009

I'll have to take matters in my own hands

There are shorter videos but this one shows many aspects of the carrier landings

Wombat had a rant on his blog

I don't like to get too political on this blog, but I'm making an exception for this video. All over the country, Americans from both sides of the aisle have gotten together to form "Tea Parties" with the goal of protesting excessive taxation and spending currently being perpetrated by our government. I know what you're thinking- this is nothing new. Thank goodness we don't get as much government as we pay for.

I'm bothered by two issues on this topic. 1. FOX is the only network providing unbiased coverage of these Tea Parties. 2. CNN and MSNBC are behaving like a bunch of frat boys in their coverage by not only calling these gatherings "Tea Bag Parties" (google "tea bagging" if you don't know what it is) but also smirking while including excessive sexual innuendoes while commentating. (Again, search YouTube for numerous videos on this topic).

In the video below, this CNN reporter goes so far as to argue with the protestors. Maybe it's just me, but I'll take news that's reported and do my own thinking. I find news people who tell me what to think as unsanitary as someone putting words in my mouth (hat tip to oldjimb). Not only does this reporter argue with demonstrators (waste of time if you ask me), but she also draws on archaic and irrelevant facts in attempting to back up her case. My favorite part is where she gets dressed down by a dowdy old soccer mom.

Here are some key statements to watch for:
  1. First CNN defends her position by saying that she's not biased and that she's just been talking to people holding signs. SM (Soccer Mom) responds by saying "I don't have a sign... you talked to him [gestures to the man to her right], he's not holding a sign..." Of course, CNN swiftly changes the subject because they're clearly not holding signs and her arguments clearly aren't holding water.
  2. CNN: "I think you get the general tenor of this... uh... anti-government, anti-CNN since this is highly promoted by the right-wing, conservative network, FOX and since I can't really hear much more and since this isn't exactly family-viewing, I'll toss it back to you..." (also since I floundering in my own frying pan and can't succeed in making anyone look dumber than me)
  3. CNN: "What group are you with that brought you out here?" (sorry, CNN, no conspiracy here)
    SM: "I'm not with any group, I'm a suburban self-employed woman- I don't have a group.
  4. CNN: "No, I mean how did you find out about it then?" (come on, just show me your papers)
    SM: "Oh, it's all over the news... it's all.. everywhere."
    CNN: "Oh so it's not online or... oh... yeah... right." (So what if it is online? Do you hate it because you don't control it?)
    SM: "Yeah- it's all over... what do you think the internet is for? Are you trying to play stupid?" (I don't think she's playing anything).
    CNN: "You know- you really don't need to be so antagonistic." (while bobbing her head derisively like a teenager and in spite of the fact that she's has only been antagonistic for the duration of the video)
    SM: "Well we have been watching what you're doing here and it's not fair!"
  5. Then CNN tries to argue that if you look at the majority of the people holding signs, they're all republicans. At this point, SM turns her around and within 2 feet of her head is a large sign stating that "Republicans SUCK". Of course, CNN couldn't see that because it was "out of my field of view".
And here's the video:

(Hat tip to Bunk Strutts, Knee Kick to CNN)
From Wombat's blog:

Watch out for those radical right-wingers

The Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in "rightwing extremist activity," saying the economic recession, the election of America's first black president and the return of a few disgruntled war veterans could swell the ranks of white-power militias. Yes, because all those right-wingers are such hate-mongering racists.

A footnote attached to the report by the Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis defines "rightwing extremism in the United States" as including not just racist or hate groups, but also groups that reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. (Like the ultra radical 10th amendment.) More here:

Somehow, no mention or radical left-wing groups, communists, islamists, etc. Funny, huh? Way to go, Napolitano. Good job.

Yet ANOTHER Hollywood genius

Question: What do you get when you cross an American icon such as Academy-award-winning director and former kid actor Ron Howard with the continent of Europe - and shake with double doses of celebrity idiocy?

Answer: A baguette-eating Celebutard.

Oh, Opie! From Mayberry to Hollywood. How did you stray?

Back when he went by the name Ronny Howard, the star gained fame and adoration by playing the ultimate American rural tyke, Opie Taylor. He was a kid so obnoxiously clean, he’d agree to go to bed without supper before he’d ever denigrate his country.

But decades of Hollywood success have turned Opie into some kind of groupie for the hate-America crowd that thrives overseas. This is what he said on Friday night’s “Real Time with Bill Maher”:

“…at a certain point I don’t think we’ll be so consumed with being the pre-eminent super-power and, you know, driven by sort of militarism and this need to export, you know, democracy.”

Dang that democracy, boy!

And this is why Ron Howard is my Celebutard of the Week, in keeping with my book, Celebutards: The Hollywood Hacks, Limousine Liberal and Pandering Politicians Who Are Destroying America. (Kensington).

More idiocy from this idiot here:

Yes, America is "driven by militarism" and we "export, you know, democracy." Pipe down you fucking moron.

Mark Levin - one good caller - one dope

Read the compass


From EatLiver:

Under great pressure


Found it at Bits and Pieces:

Friday Pins


Click to enlarge

Friday Presidents


14. FRANKLIN PIERCE 1853-1857

Franklin Pierce became President at a time of apparent tranquility. The United States, by virtue of the Compromise of 1850, seemed to have weathered its sectional storm. By pursuing the recommendations of southern advisers, Pierce--a New Englander--hoped to prevent still another outbreak of that storm. But his policies, far from preserving calm, hastened the disruption of the Union.

Born in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, in 1804, Pierce attended Bowdoin College. After graduation he studied law, then entered politics. At 24 he was elected to the New Hampshire legislature; two years later he became its Speaker. During the 1830's he went to Washington, first as a Representative, then as a Senator.

Pierce, after serving in the Mexican War, was proposed by New Hampshire friends for the Presidential nomination in 1852. At the Democratic Convention, the delegates agreed easily enough upon a platform pledging undeviating support of the Compromise of 1850 and hostility to any efforts to agitate the slavery question. But they balloted 48 times and eliminated all the well-known candidates before nominating Pierce, a true "dark horse."

Probably because the Democrats stood more firmly for the Compromise than the Whigs, and because Whig candidate Gen. Winfield Scott was suspect in the South, Pierce won with a narrow margin of popular votes.

Two months before he took office, he and his wife saw their eleven-year-old son killed when their train was wrecked. Grief-stricken, Pierce entered the Presidency nervously exhausted.

In his Inaugural he proclaimed an era of peace and prosperity at home, and vigor in relations with other nations. The United States might have to acquire additional possessions for the sake of its own security, he pointed out, and would not be deterred by "any timid forebodings of evil."

Pierce had only to make gestures toward expansion to excite the wrath of northerners, who accused him of acting as a cat's-paw of Southerners eager to extend slavery into other areas. Therefore he aroused apprehension when he pressured Great Britain to relinquish its special interests along part of the Central American coast, and even more when he tried to persuade Spain to sell Cuba.

But the most violent renewal of the storm stemmed from the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which repealed the Missouri Compromise and reopened the question of slavery in the West. This measure, the handiwork of Senator Stephen A. Douglas, grew in part out of his desire to promote a railroad from Chicago to California through Nebraska. Already Secretary of War Jefferson Davis, advocate of a southern transcontinental route, had persuaded Pierce to send James Gadsden to Mexico to buy land for a southern railroad. He purchased the area now comprising southern Arizona and part of southern New Mexico for $10,000,000.

Douglas's proposal, to organize western territories through which a railroad might run, caused extreme trouble. Douglas provided in his bills that the residents of the new territories could decide the slavery question for themselves. The result was a rush into Kansas, as southerners and northerners vied for control of the territory. Shooting broke out, and "bleeding Kansas" became a prelude to the Civil War.

By the end of his administration, Pierce could claim "a peaceful condition of things in Kansas." But, to his disappointment, the Democrats refused to renominate him, turning to the less controversial Buchanan. Pierce returned to New Hampshire, leaving his successor to face the rising fury of the sectional whirlwind. He died in 1869. From here:

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Tax Day Tea Party Myrtle Beach Style



On April 15, along with Myrtle Beach, there were over 850 Tea Parties hosted across the country. Now unless you surf the web quite frequently, chances are you didn't even know it was coming or possibly knew it happened. The media seemed to turn a blind eye to the event, giving it no more then a headline scrolled across the bottom of your screen. But that didn't stop 100's of thousands of people to gather across the country for a common cause, stop spending our money.



The fact that so many raised there voice's, should be a wake up call to those in Washington. But instead I'm sure we were looked at as wack jobs, hippies or dare I even say it Terrorist's. But you know what, if fighting for what you believe to be right for the people and the nation makes me a terrorist then so be it. I still think this is a great country, and the potential to make it even greater is there. But we need to start with the basics, the Constitution.



Thomas Jefferson once said, "On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." Words to live by. This document as old and dated as it is, is still our basis for a nation. The rights given to the individual, state and nation is pretty straight forward and should not be twisted in any other direction than intended, just to fit some agenda. We need to take back our government, we are the United states of America, not the Divided state of Congress. Take a stand and let your voice be heard. Send a letter to your Senator, Representative or even the President. Don't let this day fall to the way side and become a footnote in history books, make it a chapter.




CNN unbiased... as long as zealously defending the president is unbiased


http://www.dailykostv.com/w/001167/

This chick knows what it's for


From PostSecret:

Drinking and driving, eh? We GOTCHA!


From Cockeyed.com

I have a problem with the law against drunk driving in California.

The law specifies a legal limit of drunkenness, and provides for serious penalties and consequences for exceeding that limit. My concern is that it is very difficult to measure levels of intoxication, requiring complex chemical analysis which is not generally available to people as they assess their own driving ability.

The alcohol limit is a lot like a speed limit. In California, speed limits vary from 10 to 55, 65 or 70 miles per hour. The limits are posted on the roadways where they apply. It is usually easy to monitor your speed, by glancing at your speedometer. Like most people, I rely on the speedometer to keep my driving within legal limits. If I didn't have a speedometer, it would be difficult, if not impossible to determine if I was driving faster than the law allows.

All laws should be written using criteria which are easy to measure, and usually, they are. For example, unlawfully loud car stereos are not judged in decibels, (hard to measure) they are measured by the distance at which they can be heard (easy to measure).

Bicycle headlights are not judged by their lumens (hard to measure), they are judged by the distance they are visible at night, or the distance at which they illuminate the roadway.

The question is, can an ordinary person be expected to conform his conduct to the law? Only if he can measure his conduct.

Monitoring blood alcohol levels is difficult. Holding people accountable for crossing the .08 limit is like holding them accountable for trespassing once they walk past a particular longitude. The line is invisible. It is possible to determine your longitude, but it is awfully tricky if you don't own a sextant or GPS unit.

He goes on about this subject but the short version is ... the guy buys a breathalyzer and conducts his own tests. You can read more about the premise by clicking the link to Cockeyed above (there is a link to the tests on that page) or you can skip straight to the tests here:

The start of the tests:

This AlcoHAWK model featured a red three-digit display, which, if operated properly, would indicate precisely when it was time to call a taxi-cab (.08) and when it was time to start hitting on Joan Rivers (.26).

It was lightweight, easy to use, and it only required one 9-volt battery, which was quickly obtained from our smoke alarm.

Imadinnerjacket is getting in deep

President Shimon Peres had some unusually aggressive words for Iran Sunday, seemingly threatening military action if US President Barack Obama's overtures to the Islamic republic fail to bear fruit.

Peres went on to say that he hoped Obama's call for dialogue with Ahmadinejad (Imadinnerjacket) would be heeded, but warned that if such talks don't soften the Iranian president's approach "we'll strike him." More here:

Uh huh. Now that Benjamin Netanyahu is going to take over, you want to talk shit and act tough because you know you'll look weak if you don't.

Anyway ... you know what the Israeli's are known for? It's their empty threats and rhetoric. Especially Netanyahu. LMAO.

Hey, Ginsburg, RETIRE - PLEASE!

COLUMBUS, Ohio — In wide-ranging remarks here, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg defended the use of foreign law by American judges, suggested that torture should not be used even when it might yield important information and reflected on her role as the Supreme Court’s only female justice. The occasion was a symposium at the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University honoring her 15 years on the court.

“I frankly don’t understand all the brouhaha lately from Congress and even from some of my colleagues about referring to foreign law,” Justice Ginsburg said in her comments on Friday. Exactly. What's the big fuss, right, comrade Ginsburg?

The court’s more conservative members — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — oppose the citation of foreign law in constitutional cases.

“If we’re relying on a decision from a German judge about what our Constitution means, no president accountable to the people appointed that judge and no Senate accountable to the people confirmed that judge,” Chief Justice Roberts said at his confirmation hearing. “And yet he’s playing a role in shaping the law that binds the people in this country.” More here:

Yes, because this is a FAVORITE tactic of leftist jackasses. They love to legislate from the bench ... and when they can't look to our own laws to (sort of) back them up, they turn to foreign law. They'll do ANYTHING to take your liberty.

Hmmmm

Click to enlarge
From EatLiver: