United Nations (against America)

United Nations Development Programme head Helen Clark told AFP in an interview: “So the issue is how to get human development that will see it continue to rise for the world’s poorest people and people in developing countries. Because frankly human development in the West – we don’t need more cars, more TV, whatever. Our needs are by and large satisfied, although the recession has put a lot of strains on that.” 

Clark, the former prime minister of New Zealand, also stressed the responsibility of richer countries to reduce their environmental footprint: "There is, in my opinion, a very heavy responsibility on the countries of the north to look at how they sustain their living standards with a much lower environmental footprint."

She warned of social and environmental chaos if governments failed to act: “The toxic combination of falling incomes, social unrest and environmental degradation. This is reality. We have got a common problem here. We need to have a shared vision of how to tackle it. We are heading for chaos if we don’t tackle these issues.” More here:

Gotta love that ... "western nations don't need more cars, tv's, whatever ..."

A United Nations official said it so it MUST be true.  And you already know how honest and forthright the United Nations is ... and how it only exists to siphon money from the United States for the benefit of mankind.  

The part I like best is how the United Nations is always scheming on how to take money from the Unites States taxpayer.  That's all it does.  First we pay our tax money to fund this big pile of shit and all it does is think of new ways to justify taking more of our money.  And usually they justify it by saying we OWE it to the world because blah, blah, blah.

It's funny how people and organizations can have similar traits.  For example, the UN reminds me of a spoiled brat teenager.  How many spoiled brat teenagers kill their parents?  And you know WHY spoiled brats kill their parents?  Because the brats figured they were OWED something.  That's right ... the brat's parents don't need more cars or tv's, instead they need to give the money to the brat, right?  Yes, the brat will spend it wisely.

Heh, good one

Gay guy titty-blocks the rest of us (I just assume he's gay)

Southwest Airlines was forced to apologize to a woman who was told she couldn't board her flight because her cleavage was "inappropriate."

 

Jezebel reports that the woman, Avital — she only gave her first name — was boarding a 6 a.m. flight from Las Vegas to New York on June 5 when a ticket agent remarked that she couldn't fly unless she covered her breasts.

Clad in a comfy cotton dress, a baggy flannel shirt and bright scarf, Avital ignored the warning and marched aboard anyway.

Avital slammed the Southwest for "slut shaming," and said a man on her flight had on a provocative piece of clothing, but wasn't hassled. More here:

Wait, I learned a new phrase ... "slut shaming."  Sorry but I have to vote against shaming sluts.  Hey, all you sluts out there, the Klown is on your side. We're not going to take this lying down, am I right?

This makes as much sense as anything the government does

My friend, Forrest, sent me this cartoon in email.

Obama just granted amnesty to 800,000 illegal aliens - why?

My friend, Forrest, sent me this cartoon in email.

Mysterious attack by wild animals flummoxes libs

A WOMAN zookeeper was mauled to death by a pack of wolves yesterday as she fed them in their enclosure. 

Eight of the wolves are thought to have surrounded and attacked the woman, who was in her 30s. 

Her body was found by a colleague — but the snarling pack would not let anyone near her. Eventually brave zoo workers formed a human chain and rushed the wolves, forcing them back. 

Jan Tengeborg, who organised the attempt to recover the body, said: “We couldn’t get into the enclosure because the wolves clearly did not want us in there. You can’t just walk right into a wolf pack.” 

No one witnessed the attack so it is not yet clear exactly what triggered it. The dead woman has not been named. Yes, wild animals attacking humans ... no matter how many times it happens, it's still a complete and unpredictable mystery ... to libs.

The same pack attacked TV naturalist Arne Weise when Kolmarden Wildlife Park opened in Braviken Bay, Sweden, in 2007.

He said yesterday: “We have to stop interacting so closely with wolves. It is wrong, the risk is too great. We must recognise they are dangerous animals.” More here:

Many things mystify idiot-libs though.  Things such as "there are consequences to spending too much money" totally flummox them.  

Concepts such as this are beyond their ability to comprehend ... and yet the ROCK SOLID SCIENCE of global cooling, erm, I mean global warming, erm, I mean climate change ... is crystal clear to a lib.

It's a mystery, governments need more (MUCH more) of your money

The Prince of Wales has warned of the "catastrophic" consequences of ... inaction on issues such as climate change, at a UN sustainability conference in Rio Brazil.

"Like a sleepwalker, we seem unable to wake up to the fact that so many of the catastrophic consequences of carrying on with 'business-as-usual' are bearing down on us faster than we think, already dragging many millions more people into poverty and dangerously weakening global food, water and energy security for the future," he said. More here:

"Like sleepwalkers."

Uh-huh, and by "business as usual," are you referring to governments around the world out-of-control borrowing and spending?  Are you speaking of the printing of money (out of thin air) which is eroding the people's currency and stealing their freedom?  Stealing their freedom by continuing to spend money you have borrowed on their behalf?  Thereby forcing them into paying for longer periods in order to pay off their debt? 

In fact, they will have to pay so long that they will NEVER be able to pay the debt (unless you take more ... much more ... of their paycheck,) isn't that right?  And so their children and grandchildren will have to pay the debt ... and the children and grandchildren will have gotten NOTHING in return, isn't that right?  

Speaking of getting something in return for the debt, what did WE (the US) get?  Massive redistribution donations of our money to your contributor buddies "green" companies?  Seriously, what are we getting?  And don't tell me "social security and medicare" ... that is already paid for by stealing 15% of our paychecks.  And don't tell me the employer pays half, you idiot.

No, the genius "prince" isn't referring to actual problems, instead he's still trying to convince people about "global warming."  Remember, it is through health, safety, or the environment that the government steals your money and freedom.  The government MUST have money so they can wield power by providing jobs and grants (government contracts) to their buddies.  

Ever notice?  It isn't enough for the government to stick to its actual reasons for existing, i.e. the enumerated powers in the constitution.  No, instead they are focused on the best way to take your money and have you squeal the least.  And the way they do it is to silence your dissent.

And what is the best way to silence you?  Their method is to have other people shout you down and call you stupid.  And that seemed to work, for a while.  I'd say they found out about this method in the early 1960's.
  

But more and more people are waking up now.  

They've noticed the government never shrinks ... ever.  it only grows and grows.  And while it grows it needs more reasons to grow ... so it makes up reasons ... and you end up with squiggly light bulbs in your house ... and when one of these bulbs breaks, it's a major undertaking (IF you follow the rules set by the government.)  Think I'm kidding?  Here's the EPA's OWN PAGE and the first few light-bulb cleanup rules they have -- and keep in mind, this is BEFORE cleanup.

Before Cleanup

• Have people and pets leave the room.
• Air out the room for 5-10 minutes by opening a window or door to the outdoor environment. 
• Shut off the central forced air heating/air-conditioning system, if you have one.
• Collect materials needed to clean up broken bulb: 
  • stiff paper or cardboard;
  • sticky tape;
  • damp paper towels or disposable wet wipes (for hard surfaces); and
  • a glass jar with a metal lid or a sealable plastic bag.

HA HA, "like a sleepwalker" indeed.  Yes, this is great.  We need MORE government, don't you agree?  Baaaaaa - bleat.

Again I draw your attention to the fact that these idiots can't do anything on their own.  If these light bulbs were so damn great they'd be able to sell them through word of mouth alone ... but they aren't, and they can't.  So what is their solution?  They FORCE EVERYONE to buy them and outlaw the old ones ... taking a little bit more of your freedom and money.  In this case a LOT more of your money (ever see the price of those bulbs?)

What else does the government do this with ... I mean, besides your car, your employer, and almost everything in your house (toilets, appliances, etc.)  Surely though this is for our own good, right?  It makes things cheaper for me, right?  No?  Then, let me ask this ... we're solving global warming with all this crap, right?

CAIR Confronts Allen West (with subtitles)

fri pins

The libs ... coming for your liberty every way they can

MYFOXNY.COM - The board hand-picked by Mayor Michael Bloomberg that must approve his ban of selling large sugar-filled drinks at restaurants might be looking at other targets.

The New York City Board of Health showed support for limiting sizes of sugary drinks at a Tuesday meeting in Queens.  They agreed to start the process to formalize the large-drink ban by agreeing to start a six-week public comment period.

At the meeting, some of the members of board said they should be considering other limits on high-calorie foods.

Well, of COURSE they did.  You know why?  Because it's never enough for the idiot libs. 

No matter how much money the government gets, they squander it all and borrow more.  No matter how many rules the tyrants make for you, it's never enough.  They want to get to Utopia ... and for that, they just need a little bit more of your liberty (and money) ... and a little bit more tomorrow ... and the day after that ... get it?

One member, Bruce Vladeck, thinks limiting the sizes for movie theater popcorn should be considered.

"The popcorn isn't a whole lot better than the soda," Vladeck said.

Another board member thinks milk drinks should fall under the size limits.

"There are certainly milkshakes and milk-coffee beverages that have monstrous amounts of calories," said board member Dr. Joel Forman.

Oh yes, we're finding new things to ban ... Yaaaaaaa!! Weeeeeeeeee.!! It's lib Nirvana!!

Mayor Bloomberg says the drink rules are an attempt to fight obesity in the city.  It would limit food service establishments in the city from serving drinks bigger than 16 ounces but would allow refills.

The New York City Restaurant Association is fighting the proposal and is considering legal action of it goes into effect.

New York City voters oppose 51 - 46 percent Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposed ban on the sale of over-sized sugary soft drinks, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday.  From here:

Can you imagine? Here is some dumbass trying to steal your liberty and 46% of the population doesn't mind.  Why can't that 46% just do it on their own?  Why do they INSIST on banning it for everyone else?  Ahhhhh, yes, you see ... that's where the fun is.

And what is "fun" for idiot libs?  Their favorite thing is to show how smart they are.  But what fun is that unless you can force other people to acknowledge your genius?  See what I'm saying?  I  think you do.

And the crux of this matter is what America's founders struggled with ... as they tried to design a nation in which the majority would not be able to steal freedom from the minority with a simple vote.  They tried to put your liberty out of the reach of petty, dipshit, tyrants like Mayor dumbass. 

But the libs think they have now found an unassailable excuse to steal your liberty ... they use "health" or "safety" or the "environment."  And under the rubric of these, they can enslave you.

The founders knew that there would always be people who would think NOTHING of stealing your liberty ... for your own good (at first.)  The way the idiot libs see it, you need their help but you're too stupid to realize it.  Therefore they find reasons under the umbrella of their Utopian rubric and pass laws that FORCE you to accept their help.

The part that puzzles me is, I know the libs want to be led around like sheep and I'm ok with it.  I know they don't mind giving up their own liberty and I'm ok with that too.  But why ... WHY, do they INSIST on me joining with them?  I am so sick of these shitstains, you have NO idea.

What? China doesn't subscribe to the "warmers?"

Well, whaddya know.  The idiot Europeans thought they had brainwashed the entire world with their idiotic ideas on global warming.  They didn't realize that China wasn't on board with the "Great Ripoff," erm, I mean "Global warming," erm ... I mean "Climate Change." (LMAO)

In a well considered response to the "climate changer" morons, China has solved the standoff with the simple statement "go pound sand."  I'll bet even the genius libs can lower themselves to understand that.

(Reuters) - China will take swift counter-measures that could include impounding European aircraft if the EU punishes Chinese airlines for not complying with its scheme to curb carbon emissions, the China Air Transport Association said on Tuesday.

The warning came as the U.N.'s aviation body expressed concern about the growing threat of bilateral reprisals.

Chinese airlines, which have been told by Beijing not to comply with the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme, refused to meet a March 31 deadline for submitting carbon emissions data.

A new stand-off looms after EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said the carriers would have until the end of this week to submit their data or face enforcement action.

"Chinese airlines are unanimous on this. We won't provide the data," Wei Zhenzhong, secretary general of the China Air Transport Association, said on the sidelines of an International Air Transport Association (IATA) meeting in Beijing.

EU member states can fine airlines for non-compliance or carry out other reprisals including impounding aircraft.

"We would not like to see a situation of 'you hold up my planes and I hold yours'," Wei said. More here:

Ha ha @ "go ahead ... make my day, you idiots."

I know we're supposed to hate China but I love the fact they give no quarter whatsoever to this idiocy.  And thank God they don't.  

Perhaps they haven't been taught how to "seem smart" yet.  Have you noticed?  All these "global warming" morons think that appearing to be smart is the most important thing in life.  And the only way they know how to do that is to quote "facts" that are impossible to confirm.

Somehow quoting tried and true solutions  doesn't satisfy their need to appear smart.  Nope, they view established truth as hackneyed and "old hat."

Hey, here's my idea of the method China is using to teach the idiot-liberals.

Poor old Bank of America ... they're about to get swindled

Bank of America Corp. (BAC) said it will contribute $50 billion over the next 10 years to address climate change, the latest company to boost its investments toward environmental goals. 

The new set of goals will be effective on Jan. 1, following the anticipated completion of the bank's current 10-year pledge of $20 billion, which it said is four years ahead of schedule. "Environmental business delivers value to our clients, return for our shareholders, and helps strengthen the economy," said Chief Executive Brian Moynihan. "We met our prior goal in about half the time we set for ourselves, so more than doubling our target is ambitious but achievable."

 The bank's new initiative includes lending, equipment finance, capital markets and advisory activity and carbon finance, as well as advice and investment help. (Carbon finance -- lmao.)

Bank of America will focus on promoting energy efficiency; renewable energy, including wind, solar and hydropower; lower-carbon transportation like electric and hybrid vehicles; and water and waste treatment and disposal initiatives. More here:

Oh really? Yes, we must combat climate change.  Why?  Because it's the right thing to do.  I love how they position themselves as being charitable and contributing this $50 billion to the planet earth (and the media allow it without question.)

And why would they want to present themselves that way?  The only  way that would be good for their image is if people actually bought that line of total bullshit.  Are there people so stupid that they would believe this pantload?

Anyway, poor Bank of America ... it looks like they're taking an unreasonable chance with a lot of money .... investing in "green" companies and so forth ... very risky, eh?  

Unless ... unless they are going to provide loans to the green companies AFTER the green companies have secured loan guarantees from the federal government.  If that's the case, the bank cannot lose.

You know who else never loses in these deals?  The "green" company executives.  That's right, those guys arrange the loan guarantees from their politician buddies get the company financing and then get paid millions in salary/bonuses.  Then they turn around and give a cut to the politician who helped push the loan through.

Remember Solyndra?  Ever wonder how much those cronies contributed to Obama?  What?  You weren't aware of that?  Well, the media probably forgot to tell you ... or maybe the media didn't even know about it ... yes, that's probably it.  In any event, it happens all the time Solyndra was probably the only time that ever happened, right?  Just a fluke, right?

Anyway, the banks make money ... the corporate execs leave with millions ... the politicians make money ... and where does it all come from?  Who is it that is paying and paying and paying, for nothing?  

Lmao ... "climate change."  Just the latest thing they use to separate you from your money.  HEE HAW ... HEE HAW!!  Keep voting for "Democratics."

LMAO - the "Democratics" just keep crushing you

The recent recession wiped out nearly two decades of Americans’ wealth, according to government data released Monday, with ­middle-class families bearing the brunt of the decline.

Over a span of three years, Americans watched progress that took almost a generation to accumulate evaporate. The promise of retirement built on the inevitable rise of the stock market proved illusory for most. Homeownership, once heralded as a pathway to wealth, became an albatross. More here:

Hmmmm ... what was the cause of this "recession?"   Oh, right .... unfettered capitalism.  What we need are more rules and regulations and tinkering by government. 

And, we need more government departments to come around to our homes and businesses to do the checking up ... and writing the rules and so forth ... you know ... so we average dumbasses don't have to worry our little heads over it.

Remember, the lib's answer to everything is "more government."  That's right, and even though we've been growing the government at a ridiculous rate, it still isn't enough ... no, even though they rake in more than ever before in history, they STILL need "revenue enhancements."  

And now the government is everywhere ... in our homes, light bulbs, toilets, and lives (unfettered government.)

Well, we should all probably pay "our fair share."  THEN we'd be alright ... and the government would FINALLY have enough money ... right?

Hey, but don't worry, Obama is blocking oil and coal everywhere he possibly can because, you know ...he's a helper.  Gotta bankrupt those evil coal companies.

Coming soon ... the "debt ceiling" issue ... again

You might be asking yourself ... why do we have a debt ceiling anyway?  What does it do for us?

Actually, that's a very good question.  Allow me to give you my thoughts on it.

1) Having a debt ceiling ensures that our politicians won't go apeshit and put us in a debt situation from which we cannot recover without bankruptcy crushing our country for ourselves and our progeny ... i.e. fiscal responsibility.

2) Without a solid debt ceiling, congress can effectively raise your taxes without passing a law to raise your taxes.  For example ... let's say you have an 18-year old son living at home and you get him his own credit card (in your name of course.)  And he has an allowance/budget of $100 per month he is allowed to charge on the card (and you will pay it for him.)

One day he/she comes to you and says he wants you to give him $1500 cash so he can buy a big TV.  You refuse but he just charges it on the credit card instead.  And you'll be forced to pay for it because it's in your name.  It's that simple.

The Democratics want to spend your money but you won't allow them to raise taxes ... so instead, they just borrow more money (raise the debt ceiling)  ... and guess what ... you'll be paying for it.  Sure, your monthly/yearly payments might not go up but you'll be paying anyway.  And they're flushing the money down the toilet by giving it to their green-energy cronies ... who bankrupt their "companies" and then they leave with millions.

So it's like crashing your car without insurance and you still have payments left.  You're paying and paying but you have NO CAR.  THEY'RE CRUSHING YOU!!

If they stuck to their debt ceiling they wouldn't be able to steal your money with abandon.  Oh, and they're stealing your children's money too because no way will you EVER pay for this in your lifetime.   And the funniest part is, they (the Democratics) don't care.

Meanwhile, when is the last time they passed a budget?  This year? Answer: No. 
Last year? Answer: No.
The year before? Answer: No.
The past budget was passed in 2009 ... and since then they've been on a spending spree like never before in history.  And it's all free, right?  This won't affect you, right?

The EVIL Republicans have submitted budget after budget but Harry Reid/the Democratics won't allow a vote on it.   Why is that, do you wonder?

Obama & the Democratics ... crushing America

(CNSNews.com) - Since President Barack Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, the Federal Reserve’s holdings of U.S. government debt have quintupled, according to the Fed’s official monthly balance sheet.

On Jan. 28, 2009, a week after Obama’s nomination, the Fed owned $302 billion in U.S. Treasury securities. On April 25, 2012, the latest date reported, the Fed owned five and a half time that much in U.S. Treasury securities--$1.668 trillion. 

That is an increase from January 2009 of $1.366 trillion—or 452 percent. More here:

Hmmm, you mean we're buying our OWN bonds (debt) instead of selling them to China, Japan, etc?  

I guess that's ok, right?   I mean, what's the difference?  Hey, is it ok if I vote?  Where's the booth?

LMAO @ the "Democratics" are crushing America ... unbeknownst to the average American.  And when they're done, they'll blame it on capitalism and the the sheep will follow right along.  Because there are SOME people who can't appreciate the idea of freedom until they've been enslaved for a few generations.  And those people get to vote too.

WRONG WRONG WRONG

I mean, sure, keep repeating yourself until it becomes true but when even the MSM stops supporting you, it might be time to call it a day. Just sayin'...

On identifying idiot liberals

Liberals are brainwashed souls. 

They regurgitate whatever they see in the lib media, movies, TV shows etc. They have very few original thoughts ... and ALL of them fancy themselves as genius psychologists. 

I've been noting some behaviors and language that identifies an idiot-liberal and put some of them here for your amusement.

These are some of the buzz-word/phrases/behaviors that idiot-liberals use in their daily lives. 

Also, be watchful for politicians using these because you can be sure that they are trying to relieve you of your hard-earned money and make you feel good about it ... "Hey, it's for the children." 

1. LIBERAL MORON BEHAVIOR AND THOUGHT PROCESSES:

If you are constantly "treating yourself for once" 

If you are constantly finding (and sharing) "profound" phrases and repeating them to your friends (who also can't tell "profound" from "a hole in the ground.") 

If you hate mimes and, whenever you spot one, you make sure that everyone within 100 feet knows it. 

If you find yourself referring to any military/police unit as "elite." 

If you act like you've discovered a key to the universe after learning anything, no matter how small (but only when in presence of others.) 

If you think spending billions for safety measures which save 50 people a year is a smart investment. 

If you think that "society" should be able to take/steal my money in the name of "the greater good." 

2. PHRASES/WORD USAGE THAT IDENTIFY YOU AS A LIBERAL MORON: 

And how does that make you feel? 

It's time to give something back (as if you took something you didn't deserve.) 

Any sentence which which includes the phrase "so many levels." i.e. "That's just wrong ... on so many levels." 

The cause of _______ is low self esteem (or global warming.) Note: in the 70's this was "global cooling."

It's not about ___A___ , it's about ___B___.  (Note: This is their new number-one go-to statement.  You will notice an idiot-lib can't go two seconds without lecturing your dumbass and telling you what "it's about.")

The reality is ______. 

There was a "study" ... And what they FOUND was ______. 

 ___A___ is the new ___B___ 

I'm going to "allow myself" ... I gave myself permission

I'm doing this for ME ... I deserve it ... I'm WORTH IT! (as if this is a recent revelation or something.)

I was all like ... or he was all like

________ another human being.

This isn't a diet, it's a journey ... a change in lifestyle.

I need closure.

What laws will we pass, what money will we spend, to prevent this from EVER HAPPENING AGAIN? 

I've been diagnosed with -- (insert fake disease here) examples - ADHD, Fibromyalgia, Depression, etc 

If you have a habit of putting the word "big" before saying "oil, pharma, tobacco, insurance, banks," etc (Note, somehow the libs never associate "big" with "government.") 

If you think you have different "parts of you" and say things like "Part of me thinks ____." 

Thank you so much for sharing that. 

Blah, blah, blah ... "the Planet Earth." (aka "The Planet.) ... i.e "We MUST save the planet." or "I'm a citizen of Planet Earth." 

If even one person is saved, it will all have been worth it.

Anyway .. those are just a few ways to identify an idiot lib in your midst.  I shall keep adding to the list and post some more one day.  Feel free to make your suggestions in the comments.

Ingrate liberals steal some property and hate having to give it back

A couple immediately realised something was missing when they returned home and looked out of their back window... 93ft of their garden.

Mike Gibb and his wife Susan Bates say that while they were on holiday in Crete a brick wall was demolished and two trees and two flowerbeds ripped up.

In their place was a wooden fence blocking off a 3ft by 31ft section of their garden.

The couple have now complained to their local council who could prosecute property developer Brendon Sherry, 53, who owns the land next door.

Mum-of-two Susan, 59, said: “We were in utter shock when we returned home. They had removed two 100 year-old trees, a lovely wall and two beds.

“It’s just shocking. These building firms think no one will stand up to them. But we will fight back.

“We’ve lived here for 20 years and this land has always been ours. They say the land is theirs, but we have seen no proof.” More here:

Ok, so someone owned an empty lot and allowed this couple to use part of it for 20 years.  At the end of the 20 years the owner decides to use the land himself and this couple of idiot-libs think they deserve a "say" in the whole thing.  What a couple of ingrate jackasses.

This is exactly why people who own empty lots don't let other people make use of them whatsoever.  Because, instead of being able to just make use of their property as they see fit, all of a sudden some lawyer is making justification to a judge about how you allowed it for so long.  They call this "implied consent."  In other words, if someone starts using your property and you don't object, then SOMEHOW that means you meant to give it to them forever ... see how that makes sense?

Anyway, I love how the reporter makes the actual property owner out to be a bad guy ... NOT the morons who used the property without permission, no ... they are the poor, poor "victims of evil."

I'm confused about "cooking" meth

MEHLVILLE (KMOX) - A woman was caught cooking meth in her purse using a 20-ounce soda bottle inside of the Walmart store on Telegraph Road at I-255.

The store was immediately evacuated, out of fear for customers’ safety.

St. Louis County Police Lt. Mark Cox said if the meth concoction had spilled or leaked, it would have quickly circulated through the store’s ventilation system, contaminating the building and sickening lots of people. More here:

Oh please.  Does anyone believe ANY of this story? 

"Cooking meth in her purse?"  Please correct me if I'm wrong but don't you typically need high heat or a flame for cooking?  Or is the jourrrrnalist using the word cooking like a pregnant woman uses "I've got one in the oven?"  Because the jourrrrrnalist is tossing this word "cooking meth" around as if everyone is familiar with the procedure used for making meth.  Is there heat being generated by a chemical reaction inside the bottle?

The story indicates she was initially detained for shoplifting but I don't know if I buy that excuse ... after all, she DID have a 20 ounce soda bottle ... where was Mayor Bloomberg?

Also, don't you love how they evacuate the entire store?  Oh yes ... someone MAY have gotten a little sickened if the "concoction had spilled or leaked" ... but I seriously doubt it.  My guess is it would smell extry bad and peeps would avoid the area without having to be told to evacuate ... and this goes for people who are so stupid as to shoplift whilst "cooking meth" in their purse.

In any event, Walmart takes no chances with very dangerous things which may affect their profits (such as lawyers.) That's right, lawyers, who would immediately seize on the "knew or should have known" legal premise to siphon off some of Walmart's profits teach Walmart to put safety first.  Of course, Walmart just pays these lawsuits out of their profits and would never raise prices in order to cover legal costs ... therefore it doesn't cost me a thing when lawyers sue evil companies like Walmart.  Sooooo, WHEW, cuz that would be a LOT.