Gaaaa, it's a gang robbery ... oh, nm, it's just the presidential motorcade

PHOTO: Charles Dharapak/AP 
The eyes have it for Marty Arps, right, as he meets Mitt Romney at a Chipotle restaurant in Denver.

Call the Secret Service, Mitt Romney just got photo-bombed.

A restaurant manager at a Chipotle in Denver says he couldn’t help but make this googly-eyed face when he met the Republican presidential nominee yesterday.

"It’s a facial expression I do when I’m excited,” Marty Arps, 20, told The Daily yesterday just hours after the photo was taken. “I [did that] when I met Nicki Minaj. It’s like, ‘Ah, it’s them, right there in front of you!’ They’re not from another world.’”

It was nevertheless an alien experience to Arps when a motorcade of police officers and black SUVs filled with Secret Service agents followed by a throng of reporters mobbed the Mexican fast-food eatery yesterday morning.

 “All of a sudden you see these black SUVs come up really quick and I thought we were about to get robbed,” he recalled. More here:

Ha ha ... I tell ya, that guy is funny.  LOL @ "Whew, it's not the Bloods/Crips Democratics."

Now, meantime, what is Romney doing at the Chipotles?  And why were they (Chipotles peeps) taken by surprise?  Well, you see, that's because another restaurant (Rosa Linda's) turned them down.  Why, you ask?  Simple ... see if you can follow this lib logic:

Because the preparation for the upcoming University of Denver debate started months ago, Oscar Aguirre got the call in early August. Aguirre is the oldest son of the family that owns Rosa Linda's, and a member of Romney's campaign asked Aguirre and his parents to schedule a stop from the presidential candidate.

"Both my mom and dad said no," Aguirre says. "My parents are Mormons, which they share with him, but number one, they're not Republican, and number two, it's not the type of publicity or image that they want to portray.

This is not the first time Rosa Linda's owners have taken a political stance: In 2000, they also declined an offer from Bush supporters who wanted the then-president to visit.

Not that they would refuse entry to President Obama: According to Oscar Aguirre, the president has twice eaten Rosa Linda's food at catered local events, and Aguirre says the president even sent the restaurant a letter of thanks. The next step is to get him inside the physical location.

"We would love to have him," Aguirre says. "Absolutely." 

So you see, it's not political or anything.   But now for the best part.

“We lost a big order today,” Oscar Aguirre, co-owner of Rosa Linda’s, told The Daily. “Somebody called in and ordered $120 worth of food.

Later, Aguirre said, the customer called back and asked, "Aren’t you the restaurant that canceled Romney?"

He said the customer “hung-up” and canceled.

“They have a right to do so but don’t hurt us either,” Aguirre said.

It's not the first time this year that a restaurant is finding out politics and business don't always mix well. The Florida pizza shop owner who lifted President Obama in a big bear hug last month has since said his business is facing boycotts.

It's about time we stopped taking crap off these jackass liberals who want to steal our money and liberty for their pet projects and ideas ... SCREW THEM.  Without our money, they are nothing.

More at the westword blog::

Helping the humans with very important egg information

You can distinguish a raw egg from a hard-boiled one by spinning it. The reason for this was puzzled out only in 2002 by mathematicians Keith Moffat of Cambridge University and Yatuka Shimomura of Keio University.

Friction between the egg and the table produces a gyroscopic effect, and the egg trades some kinetic energy for potential energy, raising its center of gravity. 

The raw egg can’t do this because its runny interior lags behind the shell. 

Moffat wrote:
Place a hard-boiled egg on a table,
And spin it as fast as you’re able;
It will stand on one end
With vectorial blend
Of precession and spin that’s quite stable.

From the Futility Closet:

Impartial media? Don't be ridiculous

Male/Female commentary

Oh oh, a lawyer gets a pollster under oath - MA'AM ENSUES

Yes, a pollster ... under oath ... I'll give you two guesses as to what was learned. (Bold is mine)

(For newbies: "Ma'am" (in the title) is short for "Mayhem."

Here's some excerpts from this article by: By JOSH GERSTEIN | 10/2/12 2:24 AM EDT 

When a pollster or strategist for a struggling political campaign presents what seems like a sugar-coated view of his candidate's chances, do you ever think: I wish I could give that adviser some truth serum, or maybe put him under oath? 

Under oath, Hickman admitted that in the final weeks of Edwards's 2008 bid, Hickman cherry-picked public polls to make the candidate seem viable, promoted surveys that Hickman considered unreliable, and sent e-mails to campaign aides, Edwards supporters and reporters which argued that the former senator was still in the hunt —even though Hickman had already told Edwards privately that he had no real chance of winning the Democratic nomination. We were monitoring all these polls and I was sending the ones that were most favorable because [campaign aides] wanted to share them with reporters," ... 

Share them with reporters?  Weren't you afraid the "totally objective jourrrrnalists" might do a modicum of research and then publish how full of shit misleading you were, thus revealing you as a fraud and ruining your career for life?  Sure, that could happen ... snicker.

The prosecutor was clearly trying to suggest that Edwards was more viable than Hickman, a longtime friend of the ex-senator, admitted in his initial testimony. Harbach may have even been trying to suggest that Hickman's basic credibility was impugned by the heavy spin he acknowledged offering late in the 2008 primary campaign. However, the line of questioning was baffling to reporters in the courtroom who seemed not at all surprised that a campaign would insist on its viability until moments before the candidate dropped out or lost.

In short, to many journalists, what Hickman admitted doing in late 2007 and 2008 was no more a sign of bad character than an actor spinning a yarn on stage during a play or a lawyer mounting an implausible defense for a clearly guilty client.

So true ... but what a sad statement.   Think about it ... "the line of questioning was 'baffling to reporters' ..."  Funny, isn't it.  The crowd of genius reporters so knowledgeable about how you should be living your life and why government should control every aspect of your life are suddenly "baffled" when confronted with other fraud staring them in the face.  

One group of fraudsters charged with reporting a fraud ... I'm going to get fat from eating all that delicious ironing.

Anyway, you can click here if you want the rest of that article.

Car chases - LIVE, on TV

A man committed suicide live on Fox News a few minutes ago. FNC had been carrying a car chase in the Phoenix area and when the suspect pulled over, he ran down a dirt road, then stopped, put a gun to his head, and fell to the ground. No other national networks were carrying the chase.

Now see, I love it when the bad guy kills himself and saves us all any more trouble out of them.

When the man first exited the car, anchor Shepard Smith said presciently  ”You wait for the end of these things and you worry how they may end.” Viewers could hear Studio B crew members, who were watching a live feed of what was happening, gasp and Smith say, “Get off, get off, get off,” asking the control room to cut away. But they didn’t in time.

Yes, well, in my humble opinion, Shep Smith is a doofus and should be working on one of the lib networks like CBS, ABC, or NBC.

Fox then went to a commercial break. Upon returning, Smith said, “Well I’ve got some explaining to do.”

Smith explained that after the suspect exited the car, the network went into a five second delay, but that they failed to cut away.

And why would they "cut away?"  Is it because you can't handle real life ... or death?  What kind of candy-assed libtard is grossed out by some criminal crapstain blowing his own brains out?

“We really messed up, and we are all really sorry. That didn’t belong on TV. I personally apologize to you that that happened,” Smith added “That will not happen again on my watch, and I am sorry.” More here:

"Won't happen again on my watch."  LMAO.  Hey, Shep, do YOU control all the monitors and clips etc?  Or do they just put your words on the prompter and then they play the clips along with it?  Something tells me you aren't running the show over there like riding a bucking bronco ... just my two pesos.

Anyway, no need to apologize to ME, Shep ... I'd much rather see the suicide than have you idiot-libs "cut away" and spare my tender eyes ... you know ... for my own good.  Shut up you moron.

I mean, seriously, is it just me?  Sometimes I think I should rename this blog "Is it just me?"  Here's the video if you think your itty bitty pea brain can handle the trauma.

I got thinking about the Obama "recovery"

Remember at the end of Bush's  presidency?  When unemployment was around 5% ... and gas prices were about $1.85?  Remember how the media used to constantly be worried about "recession" the whole time Bush was president?  Oh yes, that's all they talked about, how recession was coming ... soon ... sooner than before ... any minute now ... right around the corner

But not anymore folks ... it's "recovery" time. As SOON as Obama "got president" the media changed its tune. Now it's nothing but "recovery."  Yes, we're in it right now ... are you feelin' it?  And don't you like the emperor's new clothes? 

Funny how the media presents things to the public depending on whether the president is a conservative or a liberal.  That's because they are very objective ... nope, no bias whatsoever.

But don't worry, all the printing of money couldn't POSSIBLY have a negative effect on us later ... nah, if you hear something like that (which you won't, from the media) just remember, that kind of thinking is just realistic conservative propaganda.

Biased media? WHAT biased media?

Two shocking photos coming off the wire of Benjamin Netanyahu addressing the United Nations moments ago. The first is from the Associated Press: 

The second one (which is very similar) is from Reuters.

Of the hundreds of professional photos taken at this speech, the AP and Reuters decided to push these onto the wire.

From the Weekly Standard:

Yes, that's so you would get the idea that this guy is Hitler.  And who was Hitler?  Oh, that's right, he's the guy that was into killing all the Jews.  And Netanyahu is the Prime Minister of Israel.  See how logical that is?  Well, you'd see the logic and reason ... if you were an idiot-lib a jourrrrnalist.

Can't you just see them all ... giggling with glee about their brainwashing little "joke."

You know those ads you see for free cell phones?

More liberal logic

If you didn't vote for Obama, you're a racist.

If you vote for Mia Love, you're a racist.

Got it?  That's the epitome of liberal logic.

Of course, the idiot-liberals Democratics say "If you're a successful black person who refuses to adorn yourself with victim status and denounce whitey, then you're an Oreo, an Uncle Tom," get it?

If she wins, she'd be the first black Republican woman ever elected to congress.  

And that fact set me to thinking ... cuz I think I found some racism.

It seems to me that the majority of black Democratics are elected from majority black districts ... while black Republicans are elected from majority white districts ... and, if that's true, that's damn funny, isn't it?  Feel free to correct me in the comments.

Anyway, it's hysterical when you take into account the inherent racism of whitey ... it's dang incongruous.  Yessir, it's a conundrum, a real mystery ... if you're a "Democratic."

This guy is telling the truth.

Or as Libs put it, "begging for it".



Thanks, Terry O'

See if you can follow the liberal logic

CANBERRA, Australia (AP) -- Australia's deputy prime minister warned Friday that the greatest threat to the U.S. economy are the "cranks and crazies" in the Republican Party, a rare foray into American domestic politics that was blasted by the opposition. 

You mean the "cranks and crazies" who want to stop the endless deficit spending and increasing of our national debt?  Those insane clowns who want to secure our borders? 

"Let's be blunt and acknowledge the biggest threat to the world's biggest economy are the cranks and crazies that have taken over a part of the Republican Party," Swan said.   

And you think they MUST be stopped. right?

He said "the extreme right tea party wing" of the Republican Party had held the national interest hostage during last year's debate over the U.S. borrowing limit despite President Barack Obama's "goodwill and strong efforts." 

And by "goodwill" you mean spending a trillion dollars more per year than we take in, right?  And by "strong efforts" you are referring to his efforts in bankrupting our coal industry while he funnels taxpayer money to his buddies in Solyndra and other "green" energy companies ... right?

He said it was imperative that Congress reach an agreement to support growth and avoid a "fiscal cliff" of deep government spending cuts and higher taxes in January, which he said could push the U.S. economy back into recession. More here:

Yes, it was all the  cuts in government spending and efforts to balance our budget that pushed us into a recession.  My GOD, such logic and reason ... what an unmitigated idiot liberal genius.

Meanwhile, what do the conservatives really want?  In a nutshell, they want the government off your back and out of your pocket, they want cheaters & criminals in jail (protect your life and property,) they want the borders (and voting) secure.  Yes, what a bunch of crazies and lunatics.

And what do the liberals want?  Your liberty and private property (money.)  They have elaborate and grandiose plans for you ... and all of them involve you doing as you're told and giving the government money. 

Oh, and no matter how much they get, it's never enough ... ever notice that?

Romney/Ryan - Pounding Obama

ROMNEY: Palestinians "have no interest whatsoever in establishing peace," adding Iran would use nuclear capability to blackmail the US. More here:

LOL @ "Palestinians."   The poor, poor, Palestinians."  It's all they can do to afford the rockets to fire into Israel all the time ... never mind who they kill, that's not important.  What's important is "KILL THE JUICE."

He's right though, they aren't interested in peace.  They won't be happy until Israel is gone, period.

ROMNEY: Obama supporters are more likely to depend on government. More here 

Yes, and who IS the "government?"  They are actually dependent upon YOU ... they only need the government to force you to "donate" to their particular charity.

Mitt Romney has seized on President Barack Obama's statement that he 'can't change Washington from the inside by telling him: 'He can only change it from outside? Well, we're going to give him a chance in November. He's going outside!'  The Republican nominee said this meant that Obama's 2008 slogan had been altered: 'His slogan was "Yes we can". His slogan now is "No I can't". More here:

fri pins

Obama clears tight schedule to meet with Netanyahu

It was tough but Obama finally cleared a small bit of his schedule so he could meet with Benjamin Netanyahu ... oh, wait ... maybe not.

And HERE'S a post for our liberal friends

Everyone knows that Romney is "for the rich."  That's right, he doesn't care about the poor.  You know how I know?  Because other people say so, that's why ... and how could THEY be wrong?  And excellent info like the following is everywhere.

See what I mean?  It doesn't take a genius to appreciate the "subtle" message in these images.  And guess what ... it's funny because it's true, right?  Those stupid Republicans/rich people, grrrrrrrr, I hate them, don't you?

Yes, Romney hates the poor ... it's perfectly logical and reasonable ... to an idiot-lib.

Hey, O-Dumbass ... we'll take the same "luck" we had in 2010. I've got three words for you communists idiot-libs ... "All your base."

Car Insurance - government mandated ripoff

So a few days ago I got my insurance renewal in the mail.  The price had gone up 25% for six months.  So I calls my insurance company and they say "Oh, there is a 'not-at-fault-accident on the record and they charge a surcharge for that."

In other words, a few months ago a lady hit my wife's car in a grocery store parking lot ... the lady got a ticket and the lady's insurance paid for our car to be fixed.  Now, OUR insurance goes up 25%.

How is that fair or right?  This is what happens when the government gets involved and makes the purchase of insurance mandatory.  

Consider for a moment what we did before government made insurance mandatory.  I'm guessing the insurance industry was FAR less regulated than today so they would sell you a policy based on what you wanted to cover.  At the time, if you had insurance and got in a wreck, you insurance paid for your car and your injuries (then, if you weren't at fault,  they sued the other guy for their losses.)

All of a sudden the government gets involved.  They start with the demanding and requiring and regulating etc ... and why?  Why was that necessary?

And now government has to approve the prices and profit margins.  What do YOU think that does to prices?  If you think "lower" you're an idiot.

I ask you, did our founding father mandate insurance for their horses/carriages?

Anyway, I tell the lady at the insurance company "Well, you know I'm going to shop around for other insurance."  And she says "Oh, I understand, goodbye."  Not a concern to her, WHAT-so-ever.  Why?  Because the government requires everyone to buy it so when one person leaves, it's like pulling your finger out of a bucket of water to see the hole it leaves. 

Not satisfied with the agent's explanation I call the insurance company itself (GMAC.)  I explain the situation "you mean my wife is sitting still in a parking lot, another person hits her and now MY rates go up?  Who makes that decision? 

Her reply? "That's the way we're filed in your state sir?"

So I said "you mean the government forces you?"

She repeated "That's just the way we're filed in your state sir?"

Bottom line?  That's not understandable to me ... except that they let the insurance lobby write the laws ... and what are the laws?  They can do anything they damn well please.  Lucky for "government regulation," right?"

Liberals all in uproar -- world hates America

Yeah, wait a minute, I thought the communists Democratics told us the world would love us ... if only we elected Barack Obama.  Remember that?  Did you believe it?  Did you care if the world loved us or not?  I didn't care but the liberals do care ... being loved and accepted is critical to an idiot-lib.

Sometimes these "America haters" remind me of a teenager still living at home.  It's "cool" to hate your parents.  Don't EVER let on you love your parents around "the cool crowd." You'll be out faster than Elton John on his first trip to Key West.

The only difference is, if we let on that we might love our parents, the cool crowd won't point and holler Enemy of Islam witch , and then behead us.

Anyway, we give these people tons of money and they hate our guts.  Just like the 21 year old in the basement, total ingrates.

High school kids becoming conservatives before your eyes

Mukwonago student Collin Muelling, (right) layers on toppings in the lunch line at Mukwonago High School, where football players led a boycott of the new federally mandated school lunch calorie limits.

Following new federal guidelines, school districts nationwide have retooled their menus to meet new requirements to serve more whole grains, only low-fat or nonfat milk, daily helpings of both fruits and vegetables, and fewer sugary and salty items. And for the first time, federal funds for school lunches mandate age-aligned calorie maximums. The adjustments are part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 touted by Michelle Obama and use the updated Dietary Guidelines for Americans from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

LMAO -- "federal guidelines ... I said FEDERAL."

The sub sandwich line at Mukwonago High used to let students pile veggies on a six-inch French bread bun. Options now include a fist-sized whole wheat roll or multigrain wrap, and the once popular line is now mostly empty.

The healthier food is less the issue than the portions.

"A freshman girl who weighs 100 pounds can eat this lunch and feel completely full, maybe even a little bloated," said Joey Bougneit, a Mukwonago senior.

But Blohm is a 6-foot-3-inch, 210-pound linebacker. He's also class president, and takes several Advanced Placement classes. If schools want students to perform well, he said, they can't be sitting in their chairs hungry.

Heh, I think you're going to find out you CAN sit in your chair hungry.  

What's that? You dare question the liberals? If you do, they'll tell you you're stupid ... or uncool ... or racist.  That's what they substitute for logic and reason when someone asks them "why don't you leave me a alone?"  

Last year's fare featured favorites like chicken nuggets and mini corn dogs in helpings that were "relatively decent," Bougneit said. But health-conscious regulations have changed that. Last week's super nacho plate, for example, offered just eight tortilla chips.

Get that?  Eight chips ... and none of the idiot adults bats an eye.  They're so GD brainwashed this seems logical and reasonable to them ... oh, plus, they're sheep idiot-libs.

Adding to the dissatisfaction is a 10-cent price hike on lunches because the USDA, which oversees the National School Lunch Program, forced many districts to raise full-price lunches closer to the $2.86 it reimburses for students who qualify for free lunches. That means the leaner, greener lunches at Mukwonago High this year now cost $2.50 instead of $2.40.

"Now it's worse tasting, smaller sized and higher priced," Bougneit said. More here:

Yes, and welcome to incompetent boobs government intervention.  This is what the government does with everything it touches.  

I guess this is what the founding fathers intended by the idea of "limited government" and "enumerated powers."  Yes, they REALLY meant that government could tell you you MUST eat a shit sandwich, AND, pay more than necessary for the privilege.

The good news is that these high schoolers are learning the lesson early.  The lesson?  They want to be free ... but idiot-liberals/Democratics insist on enslaving them.

Remember kids, the "Democratics" will always be there to write the endless stream of rules by which you will abide.  

And they'll always tell you it's for science, or for your own good/safety .... but you can count on this much, you will never be free as long as they have their way. Why?  Because Democratics believe these things must be "fixed" (by the government) ... and the only way to fix them is to give the government more of your liberty power and more of your private property money.

Please kids of Mukwonago ...  remember that when you turn eighteen and go to vote Turn these disgusting Democratics tyrants out of government.

Nitwit former hippy discovers racists are everywhere

NEW YORK (AP) — Randy Newman is weighing in on the presidential election, and he's playing the race card through a song he wrote called "I'm Dreaming."

Note: Singer, songwriter and film composer Randy Newman is best known for such songs as "Short People," Sail Away, I Love L.A.," and Mama Told Me Not to Come."

The piano tune features the refrain: "I'm dreaming of a white president." It is full of satirical, sarcastic — and signature — Newman anecdotes about someone who votes for the president because he is white.

Newman, who is white, is openly supporting President Barack Obama. He says he wants the public to find comedic relief in the song, but to also know he's serious about his thoughts that racism is well and alive in the world — and in the current presidential race. He called racism "the great issue of this country." More here:

Oops, I've been busted by the dumbass slobbering liberal great intuitive genius, Randy Newman.  He's found me out.  I want Obama out because he's black.  Never mind things like:

• He has former "Weather Underground" terrorists as friends
• His pastor was a screaming anti-Semite named Reverend Wright
• He won't protect our borders and sues any state which tries to protect its borders.
• He doesn't support voter ID laws and sues every state which tries to conduct a fair and verifiable election.
• He keeps throttling businesses with increased regulations that never seem to stop coming
• He keeps throttling the workers by taking more and more money out of the private sector thru taxes etc
• He keeps on trying to "help me" by inflicting himself and his rules/laws on me
• He MUST keep pushing people and businesses around -- for their own good.
• Unemployment is high and getting worse but he will NOT remove his boot from the throat of evil businesses.
• Gas has doubled since he took office yet he INSISTS on blocking drilling, refining, and transportation.
• We have plenty of coal but he's trying to shut down as many coal plants as he can. (Push prices up.)
• He keeps printing money and calling it "Quantitative Easing" (I think we used to call that "Devaluing the Dollar")
• He called Bush "unpatriotic" for spending a lot of money and now Obama has far outdone him.
• Everything he is doing restricts freedom and liberty instead of expanding them.
• I disagree with his communist/socialist mindset.  I know he just wants to help but I want him to leave me alone.

I could go on and on and on ... but it wouldn't matter to drooling fuckwitted former hippies great liberal geniuses like Randy what's-his-name.  No,  because facts, logic and reason are undetectable to idiot-libs.  Old Randy thinks I'm against Obama because he's black.  Tsk tsk, poor idiot-libs ... people point out all these problems and all they can do is point and holler "witch."

Honestly, I'm tired of arguing with idiot-libs.  I'm to the point of saying "why don't you just leave me alone ... is that possible?"  I'm telling you, the answer will ALWAYS be "no."  And they try to justify their tyranny with horse crap they claim is "science," or they'll allude to "the greater good," or they'll say "it's for your OWN good."  But it all ends the same way, doesn't it ... idiot-libs will not leave you alone ... ever ... period.

Newman believes Obama will be re-elected in November and feels that Republican contender Mitt Romney isn't a "serious candidate for president."

Of course he does ... because he's an idiot-lib and reality is undetectable to him.

Newman said he's proud of how America has progressed, though, but adds that "there's a long way to go."

Oh really?  What insight.  And here the rest of us thought everything was hunky dory, racewise. Meanwhile, there will ALWAYS be racists ... no matter how much idiot-libs focus on it and waste everyone's time trying to eliminate it completely, it will never happen ... ever. And yet he called racism "the great issue of this country."  Hey, Randy, get past it you idiot.

"No European country would have elected a black man," he said. "I can't believe it happened. I think it's fantastic, like a step on the moon."

Right, and that's how these racist bastards think ... it's SUCH a shock to them when a black man does well ... HUGE surprise to idiot-libs ... really ... because "hey, how did he to THAT ... HE'S BLACK!"  How did all these racists elect a black man?  It's a mystery ... to libs.

You get the logic right?  We elected him and then became racists ... so now we're gonna kick his ass out. This makes perfect logic to a lib.