Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Global Warming Leeches ... I mean, "Scientists," stuck in ice

 

Yes, it's all so funny, isn't it?

Global warming scientists forced to admit defeat... because of too much ice: Stranded Antarctic ship's crew will be rescued by helicopter

  • Chris Turney, a climate scientist and leader of the expedition, was going to document 'environmental changes' at the pole
  • In an interview he said he expected melting ice to play a part in expedition
Yes, well ... hey, Dr Chris ... where are you getting the money for this "expedition?"  Let me guess, right out of my wallet, right, asshole?

What I want to know is, since when is "funding bullshit science" on the list of enumerated powers in the constitution?  Is this a sign of "limited government?"  Or is it more likely a sign of "unlimited government?"

I love it, they just take millions and squander it so Little Bo Sheep can commune with a gd penguin.


More here:

And then some genius-lib commenter posts:

"It is called CLIMATE CHANGE and it means Colder Winters and Hotter Summers and therefore more extremes just like this. Want proof this is it!"

Right ... because everything is "PROOF" with these people.  And why are they so interested in "proving" anything?  Answer: So they can separate you from your cash.  That's the ONLY reason.

Warming?  PROOF!
Cooling?  PROOF!
Lots of storms?  PROOF!
Fewer storms?  PROOF!
Ice melting?  PROOF!
Too much ice?  PROOF!

Think about it ... if they couldn't use the government to separate you from your money, then why would they care what you think?  But they have to care ... they have to have enough people to vote in their favor, otherwise, they might have to get jobs.

Meanwhile, remember when it was "Global Cooling" in the 70's?  Remember when they had to admit they are wrong?  Yes, and  that was after spending years and years "PROVING" it every two minutes?

Do you think that those kind of people might be hesitant to get involved in another fiasco so soon after a what must have been a humiliating experience?  Normal people wouldn't ... but libs aren't "normal people."  Libs are incable of being embarrassed.  Think about it ... it they were subject to embarrassment, they'd couldn't be liberals ... it would be too embarrassing.

Anyway, the answer is "no" -- libs didn't hesitate an instant to glom onto "Global Warming."  Why?  Because it separates you from your cash.  It gives them all the money they need to continue to "PROVE" they are needed.  Meanwhile, we need them like a hole in the head.

And how do they say we should solve "Global Warming?"   Answer: Stop using fossil fuels.
But wasn't this their answer to global cooling back in the 70's?  Answer: Yes

As I pointed out above, it's lucky for libs they are immune to humiliation..

Wouldn't it be nice to let libs live and do as they please?  Yes, it would ... but libs won't do that.  They can't live their lives without involving you ... and preferably for you to be telling them how smart and wonderful  they are all the time.  They CANNOT leave others alone.

PS
The commenter I quoted above says "It is called ... blah blah."  Ever notice how much they use this phrase?  Ever notice how proud of themselves they are when they apply it.  I just love a lib telling me what something is "called."  Whatever would I do without their genius.

This is the old version of "It's not about ______, its about ________."  Libs, constantly lecturing, they canna stop themselves.  They'd all be gold medalists if "Leaping to the Podium" were an Olympic event.

Friday, December 27, 2013

I always feel like ... somebody's WATCHIN' meeee!


A federal judge in New York ruled Friday that the massive collection of domestic telephone data brought to light by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden is lawful, rejecting a challenge to the program by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The decision conflicts with that of a U.S. District Court judge who ruled against the government early last week, finding that the NSA’s program was almost certainly unconstitutional. The divergent decisions make it more likely that the Supreme Court will make its own ruling. More here:

LOL  ... yeah ... the "Supreme Court."  The great guardians of freedom that just ruled the government could force you to buy something (health insurance.)  And this judge just ruled for the government and against YOU.  These government types are really sticking together, aren't they? Checks and balances my ass.

I guess they can just take whatever they damn well please, can't they.  Your money, your liberty ... they can spy on you anytime they want without a court order.  I'll bet this is EXACTLY what our founders had in mind for your freedom ... an unlimited federal government.  And the states can't say "boo."  The states are nothing now.  In fact, why do we even have states anymore?  So they can set different speed limits?  Oooooooo ... such power!

Why have senators?  If we're going to directly elect senators by popular vote then what purpose do they serve?  We already directly elect our representatives.  What?  We need two more of those boobs per state?

How does it feel being a full fledged slave now?  But there's still some good news ... the government still lets you keep SOME of your own money.  Less than half now ... but, hey, they probably won't take any more, right?

Liberal talk radio disappearing?



Thanks to radio consolidation and the secondary status of leftist talk in major markets across the country, the final death knell for liberal talkers could be tolling. Leftist talkers simply don’t have the same radio draw as conservatives; KTLK was ranked #41 in the market in November 2013, with WWRL registering almost no pulse at all. KNEW registered just an 0.4 in the San Francisco market in December 2013, placing it #31 in the market.
More here:

Many people think that liberal talk radio doesn't succeed because of its message.  I disagree.  I think it doesn't succeed because it's not really "needed."  People don't have to seek it out.

I think that liberals have no shortage of avenues to hear their own viewpoints.  All of the TV stations spew liberal viewpoints 24/7.  All the newspapers, all the opinion columns, on and on and on.  So, for what reason would a liberal waste his time duplicating all this with radio?
Answer: There is no reason for them to do so.

On the other hand, conservatives NEVER hear their viewpoint ... because the libs actively block it from most media.  Therefore, conservatives are driven to the radio to reinforce themselves and their beliefs.

If the media were fair, honest, and objective, Rush Limbaugh, et al, would be out of a job.

Wow, you won't believe the brutal punishment for stealing our tax money


An Iowa State University professor resigned after admitting he falsely claimed rabbit blood could be turned into a vaccine for the AIDS virus.

Dr. Dong-Pyou Han spiked a clinical test sample with healthy human blood to make it appear that the rabbit serum produced disease-fighting antibodies, officials said.

The bogus findings helped Han’s team obtain $19 million in research grants from the National Institutes of Health, said James Bradac, who oversees the institutes’ AIDS research.

Hey, but don't worry, this is probably just an isolated incident, right?  Sure, most "professors" seeking my tax money are just honest, hard-working folk who, for some reason, can't get a job which makes a profit for someone.  Of course not ... filthy profits?  Perish the thought.

Also, when they get your money, they never spread it around to their friends and family.  By the same token, when their friends and family get money out of your pocket, they NEVER offer it to a temporarily short of grant money down-on-his-luck "professor."  Noooooo, that NEVER happens.

Anyway, man-o-man ... a fraud of 19 MILLION CURP.  I bet that guy is really going to get punished, don't you?  Oh yes, taking our hard earned tax money and stealing for himself and his "department" (aka, friends.)  That's right, when they're done with this guy, NOBODY will want to try to perpetrate this kind of fraud.

Han agreed last month not to seek government contracts for three years, the register said. The rest here:

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Wall Street advisor sees future



A top financial advisor, worried that Obamacare, the NSA spying scandal and spiraling national debt is increasing the chances for a fiscal and social disaster, is recommending that Americans prepare a “bug-out bag” that includes food, a gun and ammo to help them stay alive. More here:

This guy must be mental.  Everyone knows the government can print money out of thin air with zero consequences.  

Also, if the economy is so bad, why is Wall Street setting records everyday? Huh?  Answer THAT one, Teabaggers! Sheesh.

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Difference between sure things


Hogs at the trough -- and the "trough" is your wallet


A bipartisan Senate duo says they want to crack down on what they call the government’s “lavish” spending on oil paintings of congressmen, the costs of which can top $50,000 each.

Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said in a Thursday press release they are introducing a bill that would only allow $20,000 of taxpayer funds to be spent on each portrait, and would only cover paintings of lawmakers in the line of succession to the presidency. More here:

LMAO.  And how do these people get to spend this kind of money on monumental/egotistical waste like this without the media howling about it every two seconds?

Oh well, this is probably the only huge money-waste like this, right?  At least the poor don't have to pay, right?  No, no, this doesn't affect the poor.

In my life I have never seen the hogs at the trough in such a frenzy.

Friday, December 13, 2013

Oh wait -- UPDATE: Walmart - big greedy company

The UPDATE is below this post:
 
Here's a story where a guy gets humiliated by a big, greedy company ... Walmart. It's all so sad.

Here's a pic of the poor, helpless, fellow.


An Arizona man and possibly Walmart’s biggest fan found out that taking the company’s ad-matching promises a bit too far can get you banned from every store for the rest of your life.

Joe Cantrell, of San Tan Valley, Ariz., said he was handcuffed, humiliated and banned from every Walmart in the world following a dispute about Christmas ornament ad-matching at the store that he visits at least twice every day, KNXV-TV reports.

Yes, it's ALL because that greedy Walmart was going to go broke if it didn't match this moron's advertisement for cheap "decoraish." After all, who cares about Walmart, right?

But then, later in the story, we get the REAL reason he got banned.

However, last week, Cantrell had local police called on him after complaining to store management that an employee had refused an ad-match for Christmas ornaments.

“When I left, he turned around and called the Pinal County Sheriff’s Office and said he felt intimidated and threatened. I was upset but never once did I ever say anything – no contact, nothing,’” Cantrell told KNXV.

When he returned to the store four days later, three deputies reportedly cuffed him, gave him a court summons, and a notice of restriction that bans him from every Walmart on earth, for life.

Yep, that sounds about right.  This employee is prolly calling the cops ten or twelve times a day because he feels threatened.  And then Walmart bans them for life ... oh yes, I can see this happening ALL THE TIME, can't you?

OR ... OR ... this is the first time the employee has EVER called the cops on someone for intimidation.  What do YOU think is more likely? Looks like none of the honest and forthright jourrrrnalists cared enough to find out.

Gee, I wonder why the oh-so-honest jourrrrnalist presented the story as if the "ad-matching" got him banned.  Yes, quite the mystery.

Anyway, more here from the fair and objective CBS news:

UPDATE: on 12/13/13
According to the Sheriff's Office, Cantrell's arrest came three days later, when he went back to the Walmart.

"Cantrell was detained by deputies and then cited and released for one count of Disorderly Conduct and one count of Threatening and Intimidating," according to the press release. "Earlier this week, the Pinal County Courts issued an injunction against harassment ordering Cantrell to have no further contact with one of the employees involved in this incident; otherwise he shall face arrest and further prosecution." More here:

The best part is where the "jourrrrnalist" aka "news reporter" gave you all the information he wanted you to have in the original "Man banned for aggressive coupon matching."

Wasn't that nice of him ... to help you do your thinking?  Yes, you appreciate it, don't you?

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

R.I.P., van Winkle


A Missouri man who died Sunday after a struggle in the parking lot of Kansas City's Arrowhead Stadium had gone to the game between the Chiefs and Broncos in a similar vehicle parked nearby, police said Tuesday.
Police released the additional details in the death of Kyle A. Van Winkle, 30, of Smithville. Police have said it could take four to six weeks before authorities can determine how Van Winkle died after the altercation outside Arrowhead Stadium during Sunday's game. Police have said Van Winkle's body did not show obvious signs of trauma.
A man who owned a Jeep returned to the vehicle during the game and found Van Winkle inside, leading to a fight between the owner and Van Winkle, police said. Officers responding to a disturbance call found Van Winkle on the ground unconscious. He died later at a hospital. Three people were taken into custody Sunday evening, but all were released Monday with no charges filed.
Police have said investigators are awaiting autopsy and toxicology reports before deciding whether Van Winkle's death was the result of a crime.
Police spokesman Officer Darin Snapp confirmed in an email Tuesday that the Jeep that Van Winkle was found in was similar to vehicle he had arrived in, and that the Jeep that Van Winkle arrived in was parked nearby. The Jeep that Van Winkle was found in also showed no signs of a break-in and was unlocked when Van Winkle climbed in, according to Snapp.
 Entire article HERE.

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Immigration law? Nah, we just make it up as we go.


A federal immigration judge ruled Tuesday that President Obama’s uncle can remain in the United States, sparing him deportation to his native Kenya in a case that riveted attention on the elderly man who had lived under the radar in this country for 50 years. For most of that time, he was here illegally.

Boston immigration Judge Leonard I. Shapiro said Onyango “Omar” Obama can now get a green card, and in five years, apply for US citizenship, unless the Department of Homeland Security appeals the case within 30 days.

“Congratulations,” Shapiro said after he announced his decision. “Welcome to America.”

Hey judge, can't say as I blame you.  

I'm guessing you don't want a thorough colonoscopy performed by the IRS.