Sunday, June 30, 2013

How to fend off a violent attack


H/T Ace of Spades blog:

Sarah ... showing leadership, as usual

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said on Saturday that if Republicans abandon conservatives, conservatives may have to consider leaving the Republican Party. 

Palin was responding on Fox News to a question from a viewer, Josh Painter, who asked if she and conservative talk radio host Mark Levin would be willing to form a "Freedom Party" if the GOP continues to let down conservatives. 

"I love the name of that party," Palin said on Fox News on Saturday. "If the GOP continues to back away from the planks in our platform, from the principles that built this party of Lincoln and of Reagan, then, yeah, more and more of us are going to start saying, 'You know, what's wrong with being independent?'" More here:

You know, I hear a lot of smart people saying "You can't start a third party unless you want to lose elections for a long time to come.  Take a lesson from Ross Perot. The best way is for conservatives to take over the Republican party ... where we already have a huge base of voters."

After giving this line of thinking its due, I mostly agree.

However, I cannot ignore the factors below:

1 - The party has been taken over by moderate communists (Democratics.) 
2 - There seems to be too much baggage to overcome.
3 - The party has allowed itself to be irreparably branded by the communists (Democratics.)
4 - The party has allowed itself to be irreparably branded by the media (communists.)
5 - The peeps in the party that aren't moderate communists are instead radical religious asshats.
6 - Moderate communists and radical religious asshats are not interested in freedom for others.
7 - We're already losing elections and liberty like we're betting on green at a roulette table.

Oh sure, "Republicans" are winning some elections but they are not all conservatives.  Not even MOSTLY conservatives.  If most Republicans were conservatives, John Boener wouldn't be allowed anywhere NEAR a gavel.

I have come to the conclusion that conservatives need our own party ... but we need to keep religion out of it.  We need to present personal liberty and federalism as the basis for the party.  Will that ever happen?  I have my doubts.

In conclusion I would tell you that if Sarah Palin started a third party, I would be among the first to join ... and I doubt I'd be alone.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Ha ha ... no ... really!



Once upon a time, the cure for hysteria was orgasm. Ye olde brain doctor would give female patients a diddle and presto, no more hysteria. (At least until tomorrow.) Now that the modern world has made pretty much all of us hysterical, it’s still common practice to use the sweet release of orgasm to achieve a sunnier outlook on life…and the people of the OneTaste Orgasmic Meditation community have taken that practice to a whole new level.

According to the OneTaste website, orgasmic meditation grew out of the idea that many modern humans (especially women) lead an orgasm deficient lifestyle: “Like Vitamin C, orgasm is a nutrient that has been missing from the standard human diet for centuries.” And orgasmic meditation is their way of fixing that, lest we should get scurvy of the soul.

To carry out this new agey spiritual practice, a woman lies on her back in a comfortable position and starts to meditate. Her designated stroker then fondles her clitoris for 15 minutes, helping her clear her mind and get her groove on…and then it’s over. So simple! So pure! So…awkward sounding! But if practitioners’ glowing faces (above) and testimonials are to be believed, it’s a clear road to transcendental bliss. More here:

Ok, then.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

They're getting braver and braver ... no longer afraid to "just say it."


Daniel P. Schrag, a White House climate adviser and director of the Harvard University Center for the Environment, tells the New York Times "a war on coal is exactly what's needed." Later today, President Obama will give a major "climate change" address at Georgetown University. 

“Everybody is waiting for action,” Schrag tells the paper. “The one thing the president really needs to do now is to begin the process of shutting down the conventional coal plants. Politically, the White House is hesitant to say they’re having a war on coal. On the other hand, a war on coal is exactly what’s needed.” More here:

"Waiting for action."  I think he means "waiting for more grant money."
 
Yes, a war on coal ... that's what we need, "per-fesser."  Such a genius.  I think what we need is a war on the government handing my hard earned money to braying jackasses like you.

The funny thing is that's EXACTLY whey they called for to solve "global cooling" in the 70's.  One might think that the "per-fessers" would be embarrassed ... but one would be wrong.  

And the sheep continue to chew their cuds.

Monday, June 24, 2013

That "Mandela fucker" is about to croak -- prepare yourselves


A long time ago, when this guy was an "up and comer" (around 1990,) the media fell all over themselves to ensure the sheep were told what a great, GREAT man he was.  Oh yes.  Worthy of GREAT respect.  OMG - none can compare.

And even back then I knew that the greater the media drumbeat, the more important they deem your brainwashing to be.  That's right, I was wise to it ... and it was sickmaking.  And once I made the mistake of commenting "that Mandela fucker" and some have never let me forget it ... and they never pass on an opportunity to quote it.

Anyway, the fawning of the media back then will be NOTHING compared to what's on their agenda for when this communist crapstain croaks ... and he's on the edge, baby ... the bitter edge.

So prepare yourselves my friends.  If you don't know it by now, you're about to get his greatness crammed up your ass ... and every jourrrrnalist who's ever contributed to the Communist Democrat party will do his/her part to make sure you're bleating in tune that week.

Hey, gimmee yer dough -- Wait. Is that Jesus?




ATLANTA - Police say an armed man trying to rob customers outside an Atlanta shoe store was fatally shot by one of the patrons waiting in line to buy sneakers.

WSB-TV reports the shooting happened Saturday morning in the city's Little Five Points neighborhood, where people lined up outside Wish Clothing to buy new $180 sneakers endorsed by Miami Heat star LeBron James.

Witnesses told police a man armed with a gun tried to rob people standing outside the store. But one of the customers drew his own handgun and shot the robber. Police say the suspect ran just a few yards before he fell dead.

Atlanta police officer John Chafee says the shooter won't be charged because investigators determined he fired in self-defense.  More w/video here:

Well, I just have one thing to say ... "Good Riddance, Jackass."

Find the witch


H/T wombat

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Stop fearing snakes you paranoid moron -- OUCH


A German snake expert died after being bitten multiple times by a viper during a presentation aimed at helping people ease their fears of the scaly reptiles.

Dieter Zorn, a 53-year-old herpetologist, died Tuesday evening of a heart attack minutes after he was bitten by an Aspic viper, according to Germany's English-language newspaper The Local. Zorn was in southern France performing his "Reptile Show," which teaches people how to overcome their fears of snakes, when he was bitten several times. More here:

Which politician can hand out the most money the fastest?

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV) have inserted a provision that amounts to little more than a handout to Las Vegas casinos into the repackaged immigration reform bill, Breitbart News has learned. This provision, a brazen example of crony capitalism, was inserted into the immigration law enforcement section of the bill despite the fact that it has nothing whatsoever to do with "immigration" or "law enforcement."

On page 66 of the repackaged bill, the following provision appears:
“CORPORATION FOR TRAVEL PROMOTION.—Sec- 9(d)(2)(B) of the Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (22 U.S.C. 2131(d)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘For each of fiscal years 2012 through 2015,’’ and inserting ‘‘For each fiscal year after 2012.”
The Travel Promotion Act (TPA) of 2009 allows the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury to spend up to $100 million on promoting travel to specific areas of the country. If the provision Reid and Heller inserted into the proposed immigration reform legislation becomes law, the benefits of the TPA would be extended indefinitely. More here:

LMAO.  They CANNOT STOP THEMSELVES FROM SQUANDERING YOUR CASH.

Of course, I'll bet EVERYONE has the same chance to get in on this windfall of dollars, right?  Absolutely NO favoritism shown at all when they decide who is going to get your money.  Of COURSE not ... perish the thought.  They would NEVER give this money to their buddies.

The funniest part though ... is how America is broke ... in deeper debt than ever ... debt crushing the economy ... but do they care?  Do they slow down at all?  Do they apply the slightest bit of pressure on the brake?  Answer - Hell NO.  They can't squander fast enough.  It's as if they are in a contest to see who can crush America the most.  Oh, and don't worry ... the sheep won't so much as "baaaaaa."

Should jourrrrnalists face trial for treason?


The Guardian's Glenn Greenwald slammed NBC's "Meet the Press" host David Gregory on Sunday for asking whether he should be charged with a crime for "aiding and abetting" former government contractor Edward Snowden, who leaked classified information to him about the National Security Agency's surveillance operations.

"To the extent that you have aided and abetted Snowden, even in his current movements, why shouldn't you, Mr. Greenwald, be charged with a crime?" Gregory asked on the news show.

Greenwald immediately rejected the premise of the question, calling it an "pretty extraordinary" question for a journalist to ask another peer.

"I think it's pretty extraordinary that anybody who would call themselves a journalist would publicly muse about whether or not other journalists should be charged with felonies. The assumption in your question, David, is completely without evidence, the idea that I've aided and abetted him in any way," Greenwald responded, speaking via video satellite from Brazil. More here:

Hey, David Gregory ... way to go after that disgusting traitor.

Now,  have a question for you ... ready?

Question - If a revolution starts and politicians and bureaucrats are being charged with treason, should we put many of you "jourrrrnalists" on trial for aiding and abetting?

Answer - Yes, I think we should.

Saturday, June 22, 2013

What is important to an idiot-liberal?


In a video of a private Clinton speech posted to YouTube on Friday, Clinton told a Canadian audience that she hoped the U.S. would elect a woman to the White House because it would send "exactly the right historical signal" to men, women and children. She said women in politics need to "dare to compete" and the nation needs to "take that leap of faith."

"Let me say this, hypothetically speaking, I really do hope that we have a woman president in my lifetime," Clinton said at a women's conference in Toronto on Thursday night. "And whether it's next time or the next time after that, it really depends on women stepping up and subjecting themselves to the political process, which is very difficult."

The former secretary of state told the cheering audience that she would "certainly vote for the right woman to be president." More here:

Yes, because, to an idiot liberal, facts are not important ... only symbols and pretense mean anything.  Oh, they must tug at your heartstrings at all times.  Wouldn't it be great if (fill in the blank.)  Yes, and the "blank" always has to do with taking money from me and me doing as they say.  The "blank" is never "expand personal freedom," is it?

Personally, I don't care what the gender of a presidential candidate is ... could not care less.  I just want them to attend to their constitutionally enumerated powers/responsibilities.  
You know ... things like:
a - Protect the value of my currency
b - Protect the borders
c - Protect my freedom
d - Protect my property
e - Limit the size of government

If I hear a candidate advocate and support this then I will vote for him/her.  I am not interested in sending any GD "signals."  I am interested in the government getting out of my business and wallet and life.

But don't worry, the media doesn't favor "Democratics"

So I was perusaling the political cartoonery about the IRS scandal this morning and I noticed the usual theme.  I posted some of them here for your own convenient perusal.

Do you see what the brainwasher "cartoonist" is saying?  

That's right, he's saying all the other groups have been "targeted" by the GOP ... unfairly of course ... and with great malice ... cuz the GOP hates them.  And do you know WHY the GOP hates them?  Because the GOP is a bunch of homophobic racists who want to keep women and black peeps in their place.  Oh, and they hate the poor and middle class too cuz the GOP is only for the evil rich.  

So, actually, the Tea Party DESERVES to be targeted by the IRS ... yes ... they're getting what they so richly deserve.  Aren't you glad to have this idiot-liberal cartoonist brainwashing you and the rest of the general public?

Ok now, let's review the next one, shall we?


I think I get it.  He's saying conservatives are a bunch of crazies who are imaging the government is out to get them and cover up its malfeasance and mismanagement.  Stupid, paranoid, Tea Partiers.

Ok ... NEXT!


Here we have the Tea Partiers getting what they so richly deserve ... again.  And this is what happens when a mob of like-thinkers get together and start with the printing press.  They think everyone else thinks this way too.  They don't even stop to wonder why they all think/publish alike (nor, apparently, do they stop to wonder about the difference between insure and ensure.) They just assume that YOU TOO can "see right thru" the Tea Party.  

That's right ... you see, the Tea Party is cheating.  They are only PRETENDING to be a social welfare organization but they are actually a purely political organization.  Never mind about George Soros and "Move On Dot Org."  That is purely a social welfare organization.  Just go read their articles and comments and you'll see an even-handed mix of thoughts and ideas here.  Not political at all. 

In fact, at the bottom of their main web page, part of the disclaimer says "Paid for by MoveOn.org Political Action. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee."  See?  Does that sound political to you?  No wonder they haven't been targeted by the IRS.

I'm so thankful for a fair and impartial media, aren't you?

Friday, June 21, 2013

See if you can spot the pattern ... aka, "Where's Waldope?"


As America's debt rises to unsustainable levels, the U.S. government is losing billions every year on energy tax subsidies that do little to combat climate change. 

That's according to a tough report released this week by the National Research Council. The non-partisan academic report concluded that current tax policies are a "poor tool" for addressing climate change -- and a costly one.

It found energy subsidies in 2011 and 2012 cost $48 billion, with limited results. 

"Very little if any GHG (greenhouse gas) reductions are achieved at substantial cost with these provisions," the report concluded. More here:

LOL ... they report this as if "facts" matter.

First of all, "climate change" is a ruse to get you to pipe down while they are peeling your wallet.  And they need to peel your wallet because they are busy shoveling money to their buddies and donors (and the professoriat.)  No longer do they feel the need to hide it.   No longer do they try to restrain themselves.  No.  They shovel it out by the BILLIONS and when they run out, they borrow more and squander it ... faster and faster before you shut the whole party down.

Because, guess what, in the 70's they called it global cooling and the solution was for them to tax everything in sight, and shut down oil drilling and coal fired power plants.  
 
Then it became "global warming" in the 90's and the solution was for them to tax everything in sight, and shut down oil drilling and coal fired power plants.  Oh yes. 
 
Then it was no longer warming so they renamed it "climate change" ... and the solution was for them to tax everything in sight, shut down oil drilling and coal fired power plants.  Are you seeing a pattern, Ellie Mae?  Probably not, or you'd be squealing like a pig for politicians to knock it off.

Instead, politicians are taxing the crap out of you at the pump and the electric company.  Oh, they claim they are only taxing "big oil/coal" ... but where do you think big oil/coal get their money?  For that matter, where do you think "the rich" get their money?  Where do you think evil corporations get their money?  That's right, Einstein.

Hey ... you're a racist, baby-killing, hitler-loving, global warmer ... unless you do as I say


At a press conference Thursday afternoon, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi ripped Republicans for not spending enough money on food stamps. "They're taking food out of the mouths of babies," Pelosi said of her Republican colleagues following the defeat of the farm bill in a floor vote. "Two million families would lose their food under the bill, much less under the Southerland amendment." More here:

I've noticed something.  Whenever one of these jackass politicians start up with hyperbole like "you're taking money from babies" (and the like,) it's because they're trying to justify taking money from ME.

In other words, they are saying that if I don't support whatever freedom-stealing move they're trying to pull then I am:

a - Racist
b - Taking money from babies
c - I support Hitler
d - Want people to die from an unsafe condition
e - Want to pollute, warm, ruin, (insert adjective of the day here,) the planet 
f - I'm stupid
g - On and on and on

That's right.  If I don't want them to take my money and spread it around to their buddies then it's because ... pick one from the list above.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Awesome umpire impressions - he does Dutch Rennert last

Saturday, June 15, 2013

The libs, busy stealing your freedom ... for your own good, of course.



Odalis Monzon, from Venezuela's ruling Socialist party, said the proposal would "prohibit all types of baby bottles" as a way to improve children's health.

"We want to increase the love (between mother and child) because this has been lost as a result of these transnational companies selling formula," Ms Monzon said. More here:

The libs ... they love banning things.  They cannot help themselves.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Heh, what IDIOT thinks like THIS?


H/T Wombat

ALERT! We risk losing the geniuses in Washington!!



Dozens of lawmakers and aides are so afraid that their health insurance premiums will skyrocket next year thanks to Obamacare that they are thinking about retiring early or just quitting. 

The fear: Government-subsidized premiums will disappear at the end of the year under a provision in the health care law that nudges aides and lawmakers onto the government health care exchanges, which could make their benefits exorbitantly expensive.

Oh yes, this is a HUGE problem for them.  You know why?  Because it AFFECTS THEM.  Usually these jackasses except themselves from most of the manure they generate.  I actually thought they had exempted themselves from Obamacare too.

Anyway, boo-hoo, right?  But that wasn't the part that caught my eye.  Here's the funny/ironic part:

If the issue isn’t resolved, and massive numbers of lawmakers and aides bolt, many on Capitol Hill fear it could lead to a brain drain just as Congress tackles a slew of weighty issues — like fights over the Tax Code and immigration reform. More here

Yes, the "brain-drain" can you IMAGINE? Oh ... whatever will we do if the geniuses in Washington leave in droves?  What might be some of the consequences of this "brain-drain?"

1 - They stop going into debt at the rate of three million dollars a minute? (Four billion per day)

2 - They stop writing "regulations" that bind businesses like cheddar-stuffed senior citizen.

3 - They protect the borders.

4 - They simplify the tax code.

5 - They might disband and defund about 1,000 useless government agencies.

OH ... WOE WOULD BE US IF THE GENIUSES LEAVE!!!  WE'RE AFRIGHTED!!

Republicans to toss us under the bus


(CNSNews.com) - In his prepared text for a speech he is delivering today at the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference and Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles, Sen. Rand Paul (R.-Ky.) said to illegal aliens who want to live and work in the United States: “We will find a place for you.”

Paul also said he envisions today’s illegal aliens becoming additional “taxpayers.”

“Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers,” said Paul. More here:

Yeah, ok ... I buy it.  Except, they probably already pay taxes since it comes right out of their checks.  Oh sure, some of them are paid "under the table" but my guess would be about 5% tops.

So what does that leave us?  Just the 5% and the rich illegal business owner ... prolly plenty of them too, right?

So I take it back ... I don't "buy it."  And that leaves me with a question:

Question: Why else would they (politicians) vote for amnesty?  Why would they continue to vote against securing our border against the tide of illegals?  Why would they persecute Sheriff Arpaio down in Phoenix?

Answer: Because they think they're buying votes. It's the only "logical" answer.

I love how they think they're going to get more votes by doing this. Your job matters NOTHING to them.  The future of your family doesn't faze them in the least.  All that matters is they get power ... period.


Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Ooooooo, we found free money by taxing those no-good witches


MINNEAPOLIS (WCCO) – A big jump in the state’s cigarette tax is still more than two weeks away, but it’s already having a huge impact on smokers. They’re stocking up and changing their habits.

During the noontime rush inside Super Smokedale Tobacco in Oakdale, folks like Bill Gardner are hoarding cartons upon cartons of cigarettes – buying a dozen or more cartons at a time.

But stocking up on a product priced at over $52 per carton isn’t cheap. On just this one visit, Bill will fork over $683.60 to the store cashier.

Gardner and other customers are buying enough cigarettes to last them months.

The simple explanation is starting July 1, the Minnesota cigarette tax will jump by $1.60 per pack. More here:

This is awesome.  Because, as well all know by now, governments always need more money.  It's never enough.  And nobody will squeal if they're taxing the witches ... because, witches DESERVE to be taxed.

They always need more to pass around to their buddies/donors.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

A little more on "Global warming."

There's this jackass ... Schneider. He's a HUGE supporter of "Global Warming." Oh yes. And he's a "scientist," you see. Thanks to wattsupwiththat.



And the libs are always with the "What? You don't believe in SCIENCE? Are you a DENIER?" You know, implying you must be a complete idiot cuz ... hey ... SCIENCE! 

Alas, this Schneider idiot isn't the only one who was peddling "global cooling" in the 70's and now peddles "global warming." I think the main offender is James Hansen.

Here's a little "newspaper" clip from the 70's. Isn't it just great how the media helps these assholes take your money.

Meanwhile, if they didn't get any money from the government, they'd be out of jobs. It's funny how they don't hesitate to sell you out so they can get grant money. After all, who cares about you? You are there to provide them with money ... and to sit there like sheep while they lecture you about the need to provide them with more money.

And while I'm at it, why are the solutions to global warming and global cooling the same?

The "scientists" all want you to get rid of your cars and stop burning fossil fuels. And why? Because it causes cooling of course ... or warming ... it doesn't matter what they tell you, just keep bleating.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Ever notice? Some people have an "urge to rule."



This is almost a great statement.  What keeps it from being perfect is he says "the urge to save humanity." 

I disagree.  I don't think they have an "urge" to save humanity at all.  I think they use "saving humanity" as a tool.  Because the last half of the statement is the truth.  They have an urge to rule.  And why?  I don't know, ask the bully on the playground.

Anyway, if they can convince you that they can "save humanity" then you'll be much more willing to give them your freedom and money ... and you'll help convince "the others."  Oh yes, they have your best interests at heart.  And if you don't believe them, you're an outcast ... a witch, racist, luddite, idiot, winger, Capisce?

And instead of just getting on with their business they have to call you names like this.  Think about it ... why do they care?  If they're "saving humanity," why would they stop to ridicule those that disagree with them?

A famous communist jackass has the answer:

“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

“…you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral arguments.”

- Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Did the media tell you about this? Must not be very important.




This is nothing.  There is FAR more going on regarding "relationships" like this.  They all pretend like they're so noble, meanwhile they're screwing us all out of all of our money and freedom.

Baaaaa, bleat.  I'm getting warm ... when is the next shearing?

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Ryan Pwns McDermott

Monday, June 3, 2013

These stupid Turkish people are insisting on freedom


Demonstrators say they are alarmed with the rising power of Erdogan, whose Islamist-rooted Justice and Development Party has won plaudits for its democratic and economic reforms but has recently become more restrictive on social issues.

A bill creating far-reaching restrictions on alcohol was hastily passed last month, and Erdogan has also publicly stated women should have at least three children.

"The government interferes with what we need to eat, what we need to drink, how we should sleep with our partner, how many kids that we should have," Polat said. "This is getting beyond reasonable." More here:

LMAO. "... getting beyond reasonable."

Yes, and how much of your freedom do you give up before it's "beyond reasonable?"  10%?  20%?  What percentage of your liberty do you let them take before it's "beyond reasonable?  Are you prepared to negotiate the terms of your freedom?

I have news for you.  You're not going to be getting your liberty back until there are a lot of dead tyrants.  Because tyrants think they're doing the rest of you a huge favor by telling you how to live your life ... according to their values, of course ... AND ... for your own good ... and they'll kill you if they have to ... don't make them do it!!!

And this is why the founders tried to limit the power of the government in the Constitution.  They KNEW the nature of government is to grow and grow and steal more and more of your freedom.

Long ago, the income tax was unconstitutional.  That's right, they had to pass an amendment for them to implement it.  And when they did, it was "reasonable."  Yes, the top rate was like 5% and you didn't even have to pay unless you made a TON of curp.

But alas, it grew and grew ... who could have preDICTED this?  

What a shock it must be to some.  And yet, there they are ... the tyrants ... many of your neighbors ... who vote for the government to have more power.  They are the problem, my friends ... not "the government."  What is "the government" without these tyrants ... the mob ... voting on how much of your freedom to steal ... but, it's for YOUR OWN GOOD, JACKASS.

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Shhhhhh, don't say anything ... just act natural man!

 
While the developing scandal over the targeting of conservatives by the tax agency has largely focused to date on its scrutiny of groups with words such as “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, these examples suggest the government was looking at a broader array of conservative groups and perhaps individuals. Their collective experiences at a minimum could spread skepticism about the fairness of a powerful agency that should be above reproach and at worst could point to a secret political vendetta within the government against conservatives. More here: 

LMAO -- "A secret vendetta." What next? Let me guess, the media has a secret vendetta against conservatives. Oh my, we're all in shock ... we simply canna believe it. 

Never mind the Homeland Security presence at Tea Party rallies. Everyone knows that it is necessary we keep an eye on those violent racists. 

But what about the "Occupy" movement? Anyone see the Homeland Security vans at those "rallies?"

Hey, here's another "secret" they're keeping from you ... you cannot borrow your way out of debt.  Shhhhhhh ... big secret.